Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Murphy v. Van Dyke”
Van Dyke v. Van Dykepublic domain
This appeal arises from the court's division of property in a divorce proceeding. Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending that the judgment entered by the trial court is interlocutory and, therefore, not appealable. Originally, appellant complained that the values placed on certain property and the resulting property division were manifestly unjust and inequitable and amounted to an abuse of the trial court's discretion. She furthe
Bernice Van Dyke v. Missouri Mining, Incpublic domain
DIANA E. MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Bernice Van Dyke, widow of coal miner James Van Dyke, petitions for review of an order by the Benefits Review Board of the Department of Labor (BRB) affirming the denial of benefits by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945. James Van Dyke spent 27 years working at coal mines
Van Dyke v. Skanska USA Civil Northeast, Inc.public domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injures, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lebowitz, J.), dated September 10, 2010, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, in effect, denied those branches of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which were for summary judgment on its cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) and to compel discovery.
Van Dyke v. Missouri Mining, Inc.public domain
78 F.3d 362 Bernice VAN DYKE, Petitioner,v.MISSOURI MINING, INC.; Wausau Insurance Company; andDirector, Office of Workers' CompensationPrograms, United States Department ofLabor, Respondents. No. 95-2259. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 10, 1996.Decided March 7, 1996.
Miner v. Murphy (In re Murphy)public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINAL ORDER DENYING RESPONDENTS’ OBJECTION TO ABANDONMENT OF C.C.C. CERTIFICATES TO INTERVENOR DENNIS J. STEWART, Chief Judge. The objection of the respondents to the trustee’s proposed abandonment of C.C.C. certificates to the intervenor is now before the court for resolution. The certificates are in the amount of $2,189.68. The parties have stipulated that: <
Van Dyke v. Rozneckpublic domain
About 9:45 in the evening of March 15, 1947, plaintiff Leoria Van Dyke, after getting off a bus at the corner of Washington street and Second avenue, in the city of Grand Haven, Michigan, while crossing Washington street was struck by a car owned by defendant Edwin Winters, which was driven with his consent by defendant John Joseph Rozneck. Washington street runs in an easterly and westerly direction, and Second avenue in a northerly and southerly direction. The bus stop is on Second avenue j
This is an administrative review action. Plaintiff seeks the reversal of an administrative decision of the defendant Board of Education, which transferred plaintiff from the position of principal to that of classroom teacher at the uniform salary for teachers in the classification to which he was transferred. On defendant's motion the trial court struck plaintiff's amended complaint and dismissed the suit. On appeal plaintiff contends that (1) the defendant Board of Education's
Van Dyke v. Lowrypublic domain
Russell, Chief Justice. Under the act creating the criminal court of Atlanta (Ga. L. 1891, p. 937), one accused of crime may be tried upon an accusation preferred by the solicitor of such inferior judicatory, at the instance of a prosecutor. The accusation thus preferred, if demand for an indictment be waived, is in all respects a substitute for an indictment or presentment by a grand jury; and one who is thus charged is not ent
In the Matter of Estate of Van Dykepublic domain
54 Wn. App. 225 (1989) 772 P.2d 1049 In the Matter of the Estate of LAVERNE W. VAN DYKE. GRACIE L. JONES, Appellant, v. LILY F. NIELSEN, ET AL, Respondents. No. 22242-2-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. May 22, 1989. *226 Peter M. Hebert and Theodore M. Rosenblume, for
Van Dyke, Admx. v. Reploglepublic domain
This was an action commenced by the appellee against Gerald S. Van Dyke for damages for breach of warranty in his warranty deed to certain real estate executed and delivered by him to the appellee. After the commencement of the action in the trial court and before judgment therein Van Dyke died and the appellant as administratrix of his estate was substituted as defendant and is now the appellant herein. The action was tried before the court without the intervention of a jury on the ap
Van Dyke v. New York State Department of Educationpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Weiss, J. Effective August 13, 1981, petitioner was provisionally appointed to the position of assistant in occupational education civil rights with respondent Department of Education. He subsequently passed a competitive examination for the assistant position, and an eligible list was established as of November 1, 1984, upon which he ranked sixth. He was granted a permanent appointment
State of Tennessee v. Van Trentpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 22, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. VAN TRENT Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. S60042 R. Jerry Beck, Judge No. E2015-00354-CCA-R3-CD – Filed March 30, 2017 The Appellant, Van Trent, was convicted by a Sullivan County Criminal Court Jury of five counts of
MUTUAL INS. CO., LTD. v. Murphypublic domain
630 F.Supp.2d 158 (2009) MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. The Honorable Ernest B. MURPHY, Defendant. Civil No. 07-11532-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 1, 2009. As Amended July 2, 2009. *160 Stephen J. Brake Nutter, Sarah P. Kelly Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP, Elizab
Van Dyke v. Major Tractor & Equipment Co.public domain
557 S.W.2d 11 (1977) Robert P. VAN DYKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAJOR TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Respondent. No. KCD 28620. Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District. August 29, 1977. As Modified On Motion October 11, 1977. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied October 12, 1977.
State of Tennessee v. William Joe Murphypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 5, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM JOE MURPHY Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for McNairy County No. 2003 Weber McCraw, Judge No. W2006-02199-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 13, 2007 The defendant, William Joe Murphy, was convicted by a McNairy County Jury of
Barnard v. Murphypublic domain
HOLLINGSWORTH, Judge. Each of the several plaintiffs in the above cases seeks damages for (a) the value of food which admittedly spoiled by reason of inadequate refrigeration while stored in a locker or lockers in a locker plant owned and operated by defendant and (b) the amounts paid for the portion of the rental period during which such food was stored in said plant. In the first case, hereinafter referred to as the “Barna
Murphy v. National Union Fire Insurancepublic domain
Spina, J. National Union Fire Insurance Company (National Union) and Jim Beam Brands Worldwide, Inc. (collectively, defendants), appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court confirming an arbitration award in favor of Kenneth and Donna Murphy and granting them- postaward interest. We transferred the case to this court on our own motion. At issue is whether the Murphys were entitled to a “judgment” confirming their arbitration aw
McDonough v. Murphypublic domain
539 N.W.2d 313 (1995) Stephen Lyle McDONOUGH, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Margaret Susan MURPHY f/k/a Margaret Susan McDonough, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. No. 950018. Supreme Court of North Dakota. October 31, 1995. *315 James R. Brothers (argued) of Wold Johnson, P.C., Fargo, for plaintiff and appellee. Ralph F. Carter
Van Loo v. Braunpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER WARREN, District Judge. Before the Court are two Motions for Summary Judgment filed separately by defendant Richard HorzewsM and defendant Steven Braun. For the reasons that follow, the Court concludes that HorzewsM and Braun are entitled to dismissal from suit for plaintiff’s failure to raise a successful cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under the doctrine of qu
Murphy v. Fong Schuckpublic domain
151 Cal.App.2d 64 (1957) AMBROSE J. MURPHY et al., Appellants, v. FONG SHUCK et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 8968. California Court of Appeals. Third Dist. May 16, 1957. James F. Galliano and C. Paul Paduck for Appellants. Hewitt & McBride, Manwell & Manwell, Gilford G. Rowland and George E. Paras for Respondents. VAN DYKE, P. J. Th