Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Murphy v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company”
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Tullypublic domain
ROBINSON, J. The principal issue in these appeals is whether evidence of an insured person's voluntary intoxication may be used, when an insurance policy excludes coverage for intentional acts, to negate intent and thereby establish the insurer's duty to defend the insured person against civil claims arising from sexual misconduct with a minor. The plaintiff, State Farm Fire and Cas
ROBERT M. MURPHY, Judge. | gThis is a wrongful death and survival action brought by the son of Barbara Viola Fouchi against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), the homeowner’s insurer of her husband, Dr. Dana Ray Fouchi, who shot and killed her before committing suicide. Her son, Dylan Carey Gutierrez (“Gutierrez”), appeals the trial court judgment granting State Farm’s motion for summary judgment based on
ORDER Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge The matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Maurice Robinson’s motion to compel Defendant Admiral Insurance Company (“Admiral”) to answer certain interrogatories and to produce certain documents. For the reasons given below the motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. Background1
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Perdomopublic domain
44 So.3d 1189 (2010) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Marlene Joglar PERDOMO, Respondent. No. 3D09-554. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 22, 2010. Kirschbaum Birnbaum Lippman & Gregoire and Nancy W. Gregoire, Fort Lauderdale; Green, Murphy & Murphy and John J. Murphy, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner. L
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. | ¡.Plaintiffs/appellants, David Lourie and Walter Lourie, appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment which dismissed their claims against defendant/ap-pellee, Chardonnay Village Condominium Association, Inc. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 14, 1997, app
Paul Camiolo v. State Farm Fire And Casualty Co.public domain
334 F.3d 345 Paul CAMIOLO, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Edward P. Camiolo, Deceased; Paul Camiolo, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Rosalie Camiolo, Deceasedv.STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.; Lee Affel, Individually and as Agent, Servant, Workman or Employee of State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.; J. Whelan, Individually and as Agent, Servant, Workman or Employee of State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.; Karen Ra
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. U.S. Bank National Association appeals the district court’s 1 denial of its motion to intervene in a suit between homeowner Nicole Motto and her insurer, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. The district court denied U.S. Bank’s motion as untimely. We conclude that the court reasonably determined
Mitchell v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.public domain
MICHAEL P. MILLS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the Court is Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [8]. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. The Court has reviewed and considered the parties' submissions and is now prepared to rule. Factual Background Plaintiff, Lorine Mitchell, maintains a residence in Waterford, Miss
Bailey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
McKAY, Circuit Judge. Ms. Bailey brought a claim on behalf of herself and “thousands of Oklahoma homeowners whose claims for covered damage to their dwellings were intentionally under-adjusted -” ApltApp., Vol. I, at 20. However, the district court denied Ms. Bailey’s motion to certify the class and ultimately granted Defendants summary judgment on an unrelated issue. Ms. Bail
Yeo v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Ins. Co.public domain
618 N.W.2d 916 (2000) 242 Mich. App. 483 Sheri YEO, a/k/a Sheri Firosz, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 214209. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted July 11, 2000, at Lansing. Decided September 8, 2000, at 9:05 a.m. Released for Publication Novembe
EISELE, Senior District Judge. This is an appeal from a final judgment entered in this diversity action, 1 the subject of which is an insurance coverage dispute. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291 (West 1993). Following a jury trial, the district court entered judgment on the jury’s verdict and awarde
678 S.E.2d 196 (2009) AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. STATE FARM FIRE and CASUALTY COMPANY et al.; State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Kittles et al. Nos. A09A0041, A09A0042. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 12, 2009. *198 Talley, French & Kendall, Michael C. Kendall, Maureen E. Murphy, Conyers, for appellant
Camiolo v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT SMITH, Circuit Judge. Paul Camiolo (“Camiolo”) was arrested for, inter alia, the arson murder of his parents, Edward and Rosalie Camiolo, and detained for approximately ten months. After the charges were dismissed, Camiolo filed this action against State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. (“State Farm”) and numerous indiv
Hillyer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
Lundberg Stratton, J. *412Hillyer v. State Farm, Nos. 2001-1474 and 2001-1867 {¶ 1} On November 6, 1994, Christina Hillyer, daughter of plaintiff/appellant, Martin Hillyer, was a passenger in a vehicle when she was fatally injured in an accident. Martin Hillyer filed a claim for uninsured (“UIM”) coverage under a homeowner’s policy issued to
*260 PER CURIAM. In this diversity action, plaintiff Donald E. Glover appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his declaratory judgment action against State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. Glover is seeking to collect a personal inju
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (docket no. 15) AND DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge. ■ i' This is an insurance ' coverage casé. Plaintiff Vertex International Management Services, LLC (“Vertex”), owner of a residential rental property in Detroit, alleges that State Farm Fire and Casualty Comp
Holderness v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
24 P.3d 1235 (2001) William Scott HOLDERNESS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees. No. S-8939. Supreme Court of Alaska. June 22, 2001. *1236 David Karl Gross, Law Offices of Murphy L. Clark, Anchorage, for Appellant. James M. Powell, Kimberlee A.
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) appeals from a judgment awarding Milton Hambrice, Inc. compensatory and punitive damages for a claim of malicious prosecution. Hambrice, a contractor on a restaurant remodeling project, was sued by State Farm in a subrogation action after a fire extensively damaged the restaurant during the remodeling. Afte
Murphy v. State Farm Fire & Casualtypublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Murphy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 2012 IL App (1st) 112143 Appellate Court ERIC MURPHY AND SEAN MURPHY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Caption STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant- Appellee. District & No. First District, First Division Docket No. 1-11-2143
Hatch v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
THOMAS, Justice. The theme of this case is that Frank J. Hatch, III (Mr. Hatch), Wendy Hatch (Mrs. Hatch), Frank J. Hatch, IV, Anna Corinna Hatch (Corinna), Robert Matthew Hatch and Michael Logan Hatch, (the Hatches or Hatch family) were deprived of their collective right to a fair trial on their claims for benefits under a home fire insurance policy; a duty of good faith and fair dealing in resolving their policy claim; and