⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Murphy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company”

Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014-10-15 · Published · cited 0× · 182 So. 3d 972; 14 La.App. 5 Cir. 236; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2481; 2014 WL 11034406
ROBERT M. MURPHY, Judge. | gThis is a wrongful death and survival action brought by the son of Barbara Viola Fouchi against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), the homeowner’s insurer of her husband, Dr. Dana Ray Fouchi, who shot and killed her before committing suicide. Her son, Dylan Carey Gutierrez (“Gutierrez”), appeals the trial court judgment granting State Farm’s motion for summary judgment based on
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016-02-04 · Published · cited 2× · 225 F. Supp. 3d 474; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188482
ORDER Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge The matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Maurice Robinson’s motion to compel Defendant Admiral Insurance Company (“Admiral”) to answer certain interrogatories and to produce certain documents. For the reasons given below the motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. Background1
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016-08-23 · Published · cited 16× · 142 A.3d 1079; 322 Conn. 566; 2016 Conn. LEXIS 241
ROBINSON, J. The principal issue in these appeals is whether evidence of an insured person's voluntary intoxication may be used, when an insurance policy excludes coverage for intentional acts, to negate intent and thereby establish the insurer's duty to defend the insured person against civil claims arising from sexual misconduct with a minor. The plaintiff, State Farm Fire and Cas
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009-05-12 · Published · cited 9× · 678 S.E.2d 196; 297 Ga. App. 751; 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1702; 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 538
678 S.E.2d 196 (2009) AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. STATE FARM FIRE and CASUALTY COMPANY et al.; State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Kittles et al. Nos. A09A0041, A09A0042. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 12, 2009. *198 Talley, French & Kendall, Michael C. Kendall, Maureen E. Murphy, Conyers, for appellant
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 171 So. 3d 301
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. | ¡.Plaintiffs/appellants, David Lourie and Walter Lourie, appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment which dismissed their claims against defendant/ap-pellee, Chardonnay Village Condominium Association, Inc. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 14, 1997, app
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005-07-07 · Published · cited 5× · 414 F.3d 1187; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13467; 2005 WL 1581541
McKAY, Circuit Judge. Ms. Bailey brought a claim on behalf of herself and “thousands of Oklahoma homeowners whose claims for covered damage to their dwellings were intentionally under-adjusted -” ApltApp., Vol. I, at 20. However, the district court denied Ms. Bailey’s motion to certify the class and ultimately granted Defendants summary judgment on an unrelated issue. Ms. Bail
Ohio Supreme Court · 2002-12-13 · Published · cited 51× · 97 Ohio St. 3d 411; 780 N.E.2d 262
Lundberg Stratton, J. *412Hillyer v. State Farm, Nos. 2001-1474 and 2001-1867 {¶ 1} On November 6, 1994, Christina Hillyer, daughter of plaintiff/appellant, Martin Hillyer, was a passenger in a vehicle when she was fatally injured in an accident. Martin Hillyer filed a claim for uninsured (“UIM”) coverage under a homeowner’s policy issued to
Alaska Supreme Court · 2001-06-22 · Published · cited 11× · 24 P.3d 1235; 2001 Alas. LEXIS 77; 2001 WL 700534
24 P.3d 1235 (2001) William Scott HOLDERNESS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees. No. S-8939. Supreme Court of Alaska. June 22, 2001. *1236 David Karl Gross, Law Offices of Murphy L. Clark, Anchorage, for Appellant. James M. Powell, Kimberlee A.
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1991-09-16 · Published · cited 6× · 777 F. Supp. 952; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16556; 1991 WL 237590
777 F.Supp. 952 (1991) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Edward L. WHITE, Howard B. Rozell, and Neal Davis, Individually and d/b/a C & R Construction Company and d/b/a Country Aire Apartments, and Willie Barksdale, Individually, Greg Simms and North Georgia Development Partnership, Defendants. No. 4:-90-cv-298-HLM. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Rome Divisio
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012-09-28 · Published · cited 2× · 2012 IL App (1st) 112143; 978 N.E.2d 649
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Murphy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 2012 IL App (1st) 112143 Appellate Court ERIC MURPHY AND SEAN MURPHY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Caption STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant- Appellee. District & No. First District, First Division Docket No. 1-11-2143
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000-11-16 · Published · cited 21× · 618 N.W.2d 916; 242 Mich. App. 483
618 N.W.2d 916 (2000) 242 Mich. App. 483 Sheri YEO, a/k/a Sheri Firosz, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 214209. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted July 11, 2000, at Lansing. Decided September 8, 2000, at 9:05 a.m. Released for Publication Novembe
Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997-01-13 · Published · cited 20× · 930 P.2d 382; 1997 Wyo. LEXIS 9; 1997 WL 8972
THOMAS, Justice. The theme of this case is that Frank J. Hatch, III (Mr. Hatch), Wendy Hatch (Mrs. Hatch), Frank J. Hatch, IV, Anna Corinna Hatch (Corinna), Robert Matthew Hatch and Michael Logan Hatch, (the Hatches or Hatch family) were deprived of their collective right to a fair trial on their claims for benefits under a home fire insurance policy; a duty of good faith and fair dealing in resolving their policy claim; and
California Supreme Court · 2024-07-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA KATHERINE ROSENBERG-WOHL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. S281510 First Appellate District, Division Two A163848 San Francisco City and County Superior Court CGC-20-587264 July 18, 202
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2021-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-IA-00332-SCT MISSISSIPPI FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. JEAN S. HARDIN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/16/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MICHAEL H. WARD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: A. MALCOLM N. MURPHY SAM S. THOMAS OWEN P. TERRY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2019-07-22 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00012-CV ALAN KIELY, Appellant V. TEXAS FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Hays County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-0050-C Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens,
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-09-25 · Published · cited 31× · 872 F.3d 567; 2017 WL 4227475; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18457
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. A hailstorm struck Amanda LaBrier’s home in St. Louis, Missouri, damaging the home’s exterior roof, siding, and gutters. LaBrier filed a property damage claim with State Farm Fire and Casualty Company under the Coverage A—Dwelling section of her State Farm Homeowners Policy. The policy provides “Replacement Cost” propert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-05-31 · Published · cited 3× · 2017 NY Slip Op 4310; 150 A.D.3d 1297; 56 N.Y.S.3d 204
In a subrogation action to recover insurance benefits paid to the plaintiffs insured, the defendant Daniel Sajewski, Sr., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated August 6, 2015, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2016-05-13 · Published · cited 2× · 186 F. Supp. 3d 643; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63213; 2016 WL 2858956
ORDER SAM SPARKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Plaintiff State Farm Fire and Casualty Company’s Motion for Full and Final Summary Judgment [#28]; Defendant Jena Kirkpatrick, individually *646and as representative of the estate of Ellis McClane’s Res
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992-08-03 · Published · cited 14× · 599 N.E.2d 446; 234 Ill. App. 3d 222; 174 Ill. Dec. 662; 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1496
599 N.E.2d 446 (1992) 234 Ill. App.3d 222 174 Ill.Dec. 662 Jesse MURPHY, Special Administrator of the Estate of David Murphy, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 5-91-0204. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. August 3, 1992.
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o