Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Murphy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company”
ROBERT M. MURPHY, Judge. | gThis is a wrongful death and survival action brought by the son of Barbara Viola Fouchi against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), the homeowner’s insurer of her husband, Dr. Dana Ray Fouchi, who shot and killed her before committing suicide. Her son, Dylan Carey Gutierrez (“Gutierrez”), appeals the trial court judgment granting State Farm’s motion for summary judgment based on
ORDER Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge The matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Maurice Robinson’s motion to compel Defendant Admiral Insurance Company (“Admiral”) to answer certain interrogatories and to produce certain documents. For the reasons given below the motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. Background1
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Tullypublic domain
ROBINSON, J. The principal issue in these appeals is whether evidence of an insured person's voluntary intoxication may be used, when an insurance policy excludes coverage for intentional acts, to negate intent and thereby establish the insurer's duty to defend the insured person against civil claims arising from sexual misconduct with a minor. The plaintiff, State Farm Fire and Cas
678 S.E.2d 196 (2009) AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. STATE FARM FIRE and CASUALTY COMPANY et al.; State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Kittles et al. Nos. A09A0041, A09A0042. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 12, 2009. *198 Talley, French & Kendall, Michael C. Kendall, Maureen E. Murphy, Conyers, for appellant
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. | ¡.Plaintiffs/appellants, David Lourie and Walter Lourie, appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment which dismissed their claims against defendant/ap-pellee, Chardonnay Village Condominium Association, Inc. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 14, 1997, app
Bailey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
McKAY, Circuit Judge. Ms. Bailey brought a claim on behalf of herself and “thousands of Oklahoma homeowners whose claims for covered damage to their dwellings were intentionally under-adjusted -” ApltApp., Vol. I, at 20. However, the district court denied Ms. Bailey’s motion to certify the class and ultimately granted Defendants summary judgment on an unrelated issue. Ms. Bail
Hillyer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
Lundberg Stratton, J. *412Hillyer v. State Farm, Nos. 2001-1474 and 2001-1867 {¶ 1} On November 6, 1994, Christina Hillyer, daughter of plaintiff/appellant, Martin Hillyer, was a passenger in a vehicle when she was fatally injured in an accident. Martin Hillyer filed a claim for uninsured (“UIM”) coverage under a homeowner’s policy issued to
Holderness v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
24 P.3d 1235 (2001) William Scott HOLDERNESS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees. No. S-8939. Supreme Court of Alaska. June 22, 2001. *1236 David Karl Gross, Law Offices of Murphy L. Clark, Anchorage, for Appellant. James M. Powell, Kimberlee A.
State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Whitepublic domain
777 F.Supp. 952 (1991) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Edward L. WHITE, Howard B. Rozell, and Neal Davis, Individually and d/b/a C & R Construction Company and d/b/a Country Aire Apartments, and Willie Barksdale, Individually, Greg Simms and North Georgia Development Partnership, Defendants. No. 4:-90-cv-298-HLM. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Rome Divisio
Murphy v. State Farm Fire & Casualtypublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Murphy v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 2012 IL App (1st) 112143 Appellate Court ERIC MURPHY AND SEAN MURPHY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Caption STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant- Appellee. District & No. First District, First Division Docket No. 1-11-2143
Yeo v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Ins. Co.public domain
618 N.W.2d 916 (2000) 242 Mich. App. 483 Sheri YEO, a/k/a Sheri Firosz, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 214209. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted July 11, 2000, at Lansing. Decided September 8, 2000, at 9:05 a.m. Released for Publication Novembe
Hatch v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
THOMAS, Justice. The theme of this case is that Frank J. Hatch, III (Mr. Hatch), Wendy Hatch (Mrs. Hatch), Frank J. Hatch, IV, Anna Corinna Hatch (Corinna), Robert Matthew Hatch and Michael Logan Hatch, (the Hatches or Hatch family) were deprived of their collective right to a fair trial on their claims for benefits under a home fire insurance policy; a duty of good faith and fair dealing in resolving their policy claim; and
Rosenberg-Wohl v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA KATHERINE ROSENBERG-WOHL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. S281510 First Appellate District, Division Two A163848 San Francisco City and County Superior Court CGC-20-587264 July 18, 202
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-IA-00332-SCT MISSISSIPPI FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. JEAN S. HARDIN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/16/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MICHAEL H. WARD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: A. MALCOLM N. MURPHY SAM S. THOMAS OWEN P. TERRY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00012-CV ALAN KIELY, Appellant V. TEXAS FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Hays County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-0050-C Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens,
In Re State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. A hailstorm struck Amanda LaBrier’s home in St. Louis, Missouri, damaging the home’s exterior roof, siding, and gutters. LaBrier filed a property damage claim with State Farm Fire and Casualty Company under the Coverage A—Dwelling section of her State Farm Homeowners Policy. The policy provides “Replacement Cost” propert
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Sajewskipublic domain
In a subrogation action to recover insurance benefits paid to the plaintiffs insured, the defendant Daniel Sajewski, Sr., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated August 6, 2015, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Neumanpublic domain
ORDER SAM SPARKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Plaintiff State Farm Fire and Casualty Company’s Motion for Full and Final Summary Judgment [#28]; Defendant Jena Kirkpatrick, individually *646and as representative of the estate of Ellis McClane’s Res
Murphy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurancepublic domain
599 N.E.2d 446 (1992) 234 Ill. App.3d 222 174 Ill.Dec. 662 Jesse MURPHY, Special Administrator of the Estate of David Murphy, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 5-91-0204. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. August 3, 1992.
McCants v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o