Cases

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit December 16, 2019 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENT

GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the court on the defendant City of Tulsa's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 175]. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted. I. Background On September 12, 1994, Travis Wood, the three-month-old son of Michelle Murphy, was found dead as a result of a stab wound to the chest and incised wound to the neck. The T

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge. James Barnum and Tritanna Murphy (“Appellants”) appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failure to effectuate timely service on the defendants. Construing their pro se brief liberally, as we must,

EBEL, Circuit Judge. This interlocutory appeal is before us on our grant of review under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). 1 Specifically, the following controlling question of law was certified to this court: whether, under the rationale of Williams v. City & County of Denver, </

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Defendant City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, (City) appeals the district court’s decision granting relief in favor of plaintiffs, a group of fifteen Tulsa firefighters, on their claim for additional overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. We affirm. I. Each plaintiff holds t

TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc. En banc review is not appropriate when, as here, a panel opinion faithfully applies Supreme Court precedent. An en banc court would necessarily reach the same result, since Supreme .Court precedent precludes any other outcome. I.write only to. suggest this case might benefit from further attention by

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.BACKGROUND... 1172 A. Factual History... 1172 B. Procedural History.. .1173 1. Trial... 1173 2. Direct appeal... 1173 3. First Application for State Post-Conviction Relief,.. 117

JACOBVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge. This appeal involves funds placed in escrow by the debtor to ensure the completion of improvements on property it sold. The debtor asks us to review, inter alia: 1) whether it was proper for the bankruptcy court to determine the parties’ interests in the escrowed funds on summary judgment; 2) whether the funds are property of the estate; and 3) whether the bankruptcy. court erred in dism

47 P.3d 876 (2002) 2002 OK CR 24 Patrick Dwayne MURPHY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. D-2000-705. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. May 22, 2002. James C. Bowen, Tulsa, OK, Richard Lerblance, Hartshorne, OK, Counsel for Appellant at trial. Rob Barris, Assistant District Attorney, Okmulgee, OK, Philip Cozzoni,

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Per Curiam Plaintiffs filed these actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma to challenge a regulation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency defining the term “waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act. The district court dismissed both cases, concluding

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0112p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ THE KEENE GROUP, INC., │

PER CURIAM. After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Lewis Aaron Bowe

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF K.D.B.2025 OK 10Case Number: 121075Decided: 02/11/2025THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2025 OK 10, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF K.D.B.2025 OK 10Case Number: 121075Decided: 02/11/2025THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2025 OK 10, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. In the Matt

OPINION AND ORDER TERENCE C. KERN, District Judge. Before the Court are the following pending motions: Defendant School District’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 69); Defendant Keith Ballard’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 72); Defendants Stephanie Spring and Jon Wheeler’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 75); and Defendant Latricia Pruitt’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 77); Def

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. The controversy underlying this appeal is a dispute over whether Public Water Supply District Number 8 or the City of Kearney will supply water to certain property owners in Missouri. But we need not reach the merits of this dispute to resolve the appeal because we conclude that the case is not ripe. We therefore remand the case to the dist

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge. ‘ Kristy Lynn Murphy-Taylor and her husband, Donald Taylor, plaintiffs, have sued five defendants, alleging employment discrimination on the basis of sex, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., as well as violations of the federal and Maryland state constitutions and tort claims

Appellate Case: 21-6000 Document: 010110630282 Date Filed: 01/11/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 11, 2022

IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF: S.L.D. Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us

497 F.Supp.2d 1257 (2007) Patrick Dwayne MURPHY, Petitioner, v. Marty SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent. No. CIV-03-443-RAW-KEW. United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma. August 1, 2007. *1258 *1259 *1260