Cases

BEAM, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Saint Francis Medical Center, on behalf of itself and a class of urological catheter purchasers, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to C.R. Bard in this antitrust class action. I would reverse and remand. I. BACKGROUND Bard is the leading manufacturer of Foley catheters and related products and markets its products to

616 F.3d 888 (2010) SOUTHEAST MISSOURI HOSPITAL, Plaintiff, Saint Francis Medical Center, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.R. BARD, INC., Defendant-Appellee, Tyco International, US, Inc.; Tyco Health Care Group; John Does 1-10, Defendants. Attorney General of the State of Missouri, Amicus on Behalf of Appellant. No. 09-3325. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Appellate Case: 24-4039 Document: 90-1 Date Filed: 12/31/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH December 31, 2025

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc EVE SHERRER, ) Opinion issued October 13, 2020 ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SC97465 ) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

808 F.Supp.2d 219 (2011) Denise M. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. FEDER, SEMO & BARD, P.C., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0470 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 7, 2011. *221 Stephen Robert Bruce, Allison C. Pienta, Stephen R. Bruce Law Offices, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. James Ch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DENISE M. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 07-0470 (JDB) FEDER, SEMO & BARD, P.C., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Denise Clark brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et se

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0266p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ASHLEY BARD, individually and as the Administrator ┐ of the Estate on behalf of Zachary Ryan Goldson, │ Plaintiff-Appellan

AGEE, Circuit Judge: The Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund (the "Fund"), a multiemployer pension plan, filed this suit claiming a delinquent exit contribution from Four-C-Aire, Inc., a former participating employer, pursuant to § 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"),

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMIEN RAE JENSEN, individually No. 20-15908 and as parent and next friend of minor D.J. and as Personal Representative of D.C. No. the Wrongful Death Estate of unborn 3:15-cv-08019- child C.J.; CHAVIS JOHNSON, SPL individually and as Personal Representative of the Wrongful Death Estate of Butch Corey Johnson; OPINION MARGARET JOHNSON; FRANK JOHNSON

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1019 JOYCE MCKIVER; DELOIS LEWIS; DAPHNE MCKOY; ALEXANDRIA MCKOY; ANTONIO KEVIN MCKOY; ARCHIE WRIGHT, JR.; TAMMY LLOYD; DEBORAH JOHNSON; ETHEL DAVIS; PRISCILLA DUNHAM, Plaintiffs - Appellees, and DENNIS MCKIVER, JR.; LAJUNE JESSUP; DON LLOY

642 F.3d 608 (2011) SOUTHEAST MISSOURI HOSPITAL, Plaintiff, Saint Francis Medical Center, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.R. BARD, INC., Defendant-Appellee, Tyco International, US, Inc.; Tyco Health Care Group; John Does 1-10, Defendants. Attorney General of the State of Missouri, Amicus on Behalf of Appellant. No. 09-3325. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

A.J.C., a minor, by and through her ) Next Friend, J.D.C., JR., and ) J.D.C., JR., Individually, ) ) Petitioners-Respondents, ) ) vs. ) No. SD35978 ) K.R.H.,

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Watkins, Inc. (“Watkins”) brought this diversity action seeking a declaratory judgment that it did not breach its contract with Cecile (“Cec”), Lili, and Richard Willick, doing business as Chilkoot Distributing, Inc. (“Appellants”). Appellants raised various legal and equitable counterclaims. In the initial round of litigation, the district court

Per Curiam. In this Engle 1 progeny case, Philip Morris USA, Inc. and R.J;. Reynolds Tobacco Company (“the defendants”) appeal a final judgment in favor of Mary Cooper (“the plaintiff”) and orders denying their various post-trial motions, and the appellee, the personal representative of the plainti

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2181 Doc: 47 Filed: 07/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 29 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2181 BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SHEET METAL WORKERS’ NATIONAL PENSION FUND, Plaintiff − Appellee, and BOARD OF TRUSTEES, IN

Damoorgian, J. In this Engle1 progeny case, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (“RJR”) appeals the final judgment entered in favor of Jan Grossman as Representative of the estate of his deceased wife, Laura Grossman (“Plaintiff’). RJR argues that the court erred by: 1) denying its motion for a mistrial based on an alleged error during jury selection; 2) denying its motion for a new trial based on commen

On Motions for Rehearing, Clarification, Certification, and Rehearing En Banc KLINGENSMITH, J. Plaintiff moves for rehearing, clarification, or certification. Defendants move for rehearing and rehearing en banc. We grant the motion for rehearing en banc, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute this opinion in its place. In doing so, we reverse the final judgment and remand the case for a new trial.</

PER CURIAM **425 Petitioners seek a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Nero v. South Carolina Department of Transportation , 420 S.C. 523

703 So.2d 542 (1997) Kenneth E. FORD, et al. v. MURPHY OIL U.S.A., INC., et al. Nos. 96-C-2913, 96-C-2917 and 96-C-2929. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 9, 1997. Charles S. McCowan, Jr., James P. Dore, Glenn M. Farnet, Baton Rouge, Donald F. Woods, Jr., Los Angeles, CA, Dewey Ballantine, Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond, McCowan & Jarman, Baton Rouge, for

RADER, Circuit Judge. On summary judgment, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois determined that Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co. (Hickory) did not infringe claims 4 and 5 of Leggett & Platt, Inc.’s (L & P) U.S. Patent No. 5,052,064 (the '064 patent) either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. Leggett & Platt,