Cases

310 F.3d 653 In re Norbert MAJEWSKI; In re Muriel Majewski, Debtors,William J. Leonard, Trustee-Appellant,v.St. Rose Dominican Hospital, Appellee. No. 01-15544. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 12, 2002. Filed November 13, 2002. Adam Segal and Jam

985 So.2d 1285 (2008) Susan Eby NELSON v. Robert Allan NELSON. No. 08-CA-85. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. June 19, 2008. Rehearing Denied July 14, 2008. *1286 Sally D. Fleming, Owen M. Courreges, Muriel Van Horn, Attorneys at Law, New Orleans, LA, Gerard P. Archer, Attorney at Law, Metairie, LA, A

NETERER, District Judge. It is sufficient to say that many of these exceptions are questions of fact, to be determined upon the trial, and may not be determined upon this hearing. The exceptions admit the allegations properly pleaded, from which it appears that the petition does state facts sufficient, if true, to limit liability. Rule 6 of this court provides that, if within the district, the petitioner must v

181 P.3d 348 (2007) Muriel BARRON and Fernando Gallardo, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KERR-McGEE ROCKY MOUNTAIN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06CA1333. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I. September 20, 2007. Certiorari Denied April 14, 2008. *349 Bernard, Lyons, Gaddis & Kahn, P.C.,

In re Jones, Hurie; Jones, Joycelyn Muriel Palmer; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of *388Bossier, City Court of the City of Bossier City, No. 39,240; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 26875-CW. Denied. WATSON, J., not on panel.

PER CURIAM. After carefully considering the briefs and record in these consolidated appeals, we affirm the pre-trial detention orders for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. Our review is independent, tempered by a degree of deference to the determination below.

OPINION NOONAN, Circuit Judge. Robert H. Bachler (“the Executor”), executor of the estate of E. Murielle Wun-derlich, appeals the judgment of the district court for the Northern District of California denying his suit for refund of estate tax erroneously paid pursuant to Internal Revenue Code § 2612(c). We hold that the tax was paid upon a transfer of

268 Cal.App.2d 477 (1968) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAMIRO MURIEL, Defendant and Appellant. Crim. No. 14965. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. One. Dec. 23, 1968. Richard S. Buckley, Public Defender, Fred T. Kilbride, John J. Gibbons and James L. McCormick, Deputy Public Defenders, for Defendant and Appellant. Thomas C. Lynch

233 Minn. 362 (1951) MURIEL F. McCARTY v. R.R. NELSON, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF ALBIE C. SANSBURY, AND ANOTHER. RAY FRANKLIN BUSHAW v. SAME. MARVEL SANSBURY v. SAME.[1] No. 35,287. Supreme Court of Minnesota. March 16, 1951. *363 H.G. Haugland and E. John Abdo, for appellants.

OPINION AND ORDER LYNCH, District Judge. A settlement agreement between plaintiffs and defendants in the above-captioned class action was preliminarily approved by this Court on June 21, 2005. Plaintiffs now move for final approval of the settlement pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(e)(1)(A). Intervenorplaintiffs object to the proposed settlement and request that it be rejected. For the reasons below, plaintiff

Matter of Cecil T. N. (Kascha P.) (2025 NY Slip Op 02346) Matter of Cecil T. N. (Kascha P.) 2025 NY Slip Op 02346 Decided on April 23, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

Matter of Generoso v Adams (2024 NY Slip Op 04769) Matter of Generoso v Adams 2024 NY Slip Op 04769 Decided on October 2, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Matter of Jacei R. (Kimmarley B.) (2025 NY Slip Op 01935) Matter of Jacei R. (Kimmarley B.) 2025 NY Slip Op 01935 Decided on April 2, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju

12 P.3d 1238 (2000) 94 Hawai`i 297 Richard J. KORSAK, Respondent-Appellant, v. HAWAII PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., Petitioner-Appellee/Respondent-Appellee, and Special Compensation Fund, Respondent-Appellee/Petitioner-Appellee. No. 21799. Supreme Court of Hawaii. November 28, 2000. *1240 Clyde Umeba

Matter of Daniel P. (Donna P.) (2025 NY Slip Op 01370) Matter of Daniel P. (Donna P.) 2025 NY Slip Op 01370 Decided on March 12, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

Matter of Fisher v New York City Off. of Admin. Trials & Hearings (2025 NY Slip Op 04091) Matter of Fisher v New York City Off. of Admin. Trials & Hearings 2025 NY Slip Op 04091 Decided on July 9, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Rep

Per Curiam. This is an action to recover brokerage commis- , sions in procuring a purchaser for certain premises owned by the defendant. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, and again at the close of the entire case, the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that none of the individuals with,whom the plaintiff claimed to have dealt had authority to sell defendant’s real estate or to make any contrac

Matter of Ferrera v New York City Dept. of Educ. (2024 NY Slip Op 04317) Matter of Ferrera v New York City Dept. of Educ. 2024 NY Slip Op 04317 Decided on August 28, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law

Matter of Henry Myers P & H, Inc. v New York City Off. of Admin. Trials & Hearings (2025 NY Slip Op 04092) Matter of Henry Myers P & H, Inc. v New York City Off. of Admin. Trials & Hearings 2025 NY Slip Op 04092 Decided on July 9, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department

Nunez v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 01815) Nunez v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 01815 Decided on March 26, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431