Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Muns v. United States”
United States v. Munspublic domain
192 F.Supp.2d 1046 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. James Michael MUNS; Frank Gutierrez; Borti Petrich; and Everett Galisa, Defendants. No. CRIM. 00-00394 SOM. United States District Court, D. Hawaii. January 16, 2002. *1047 Thomas J. Brady, Assistant U. S. Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Honolulu, H
Opinion filed October 24, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00277-CV __________ MARTHA MOURNING, FNP AND KHAVAR DAR, MD, Appellants V. GEORGE MUNS, Appellee On Appeal from the 358th District Court
United States v. Christiepublic domain
DRONEY, Circuit Judge: Nerón Christie (“Christie”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Jones, /.), entered January 4, 2013, denying Christie’s motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Because the district court did not provide a sufficient explanation of its decision not to reduce Christie’s
United States v. Santos Casaspublic domain
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Three defendants appeal their convictions for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute controlled substances and related charges. These defendants were part of a group of thirty-seven people who were indicted for a drug conspiracy after a mul-ti-year FBI investigation that recorded over 77,000 telephone calls. Other than the three defendants here (
United States v. Piercepublic domain
PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Pierce has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Pierce has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wit
United States v. Hotchkinspublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Otha Gerod Hotchkins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hotchkins has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Hotchkins’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such
United States v. Cantu-Ramirezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Raul Cantu-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cantu-Ramirez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
United States v. Milsappublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Brian Keith Milsap has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Milsap has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
United States v. Fergusonpublic domain
545 F.Supp.2d 238 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Ronald E. FERGUSON, Christopher P. Garand, Robert D. Graham, Christian M. Milton, and Elizabeth A. Monrad. Criminal No. 3:06CR137 (CFD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 29, 2008. *239 Alfred U. Pavlis, Daly & Pavlis, LLC, Southport, CT, Clifford H. Sc
United States v. Kyupublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Mun Deuk Kyu appeals his 24r-month sentence imposed following a jury conviction for one count of conspiracy to commit alien smuggling for financial gain and 14 counts of attempted alien smuggling for *616financial gain, both in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Parkdale International v. United Statespublic domain
429 F.Supp.2d 1324 (2006) PARKDALE INTERNATIONAL, Plaintiff, and Russel Metals Export, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and United States Steel Corp., Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 06-54. Court No. 05-00316. United States Court of International Trade. April 17, 2006. *1325 Hunton & Williams LLP (Wil
United States v. Solispublic domain
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from a 36-count indictment of 29 defendants for conspiracy to distribute heroin and cocaine in Plano, Texas and individual violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Eleven defendants went to trial, ten were convicted of conspiracy and various individual drug offenses, and nine — Jose Cleotide Solis, Ec-liserio Martinez Garcia,
Dickerson v. United Statespublic domain
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for damages to Ryan Dickerson incurred during his childbirth. The government acknowledged liability and the sole issue at trial was damages. The United States Government now appeals a judgment against it for damages of $44,717,681 on the grounds that the damages are limited by the
United States v. Asset Based Resource Group, LLCpublic domain
612 F.3d 1017 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASSET BASED RESOURCE GROUP, LLC, as successor servicer to Acorn Capital Group, LLC, Creditor-Appellant, Thomas Joseph Petters, doing business as Petters Company, Inc., doing business as Petters Group Worldwide, LLC, doing business as PCI; Deanna Coleman, also known as Deanna Munson; Robert White; James Wehmhoff; Larry Reynolds, doing business as Nationwide International Res
CHIN, Circuit Judge: In this case, a seller of merchandise was insured under two liability insurance policies for any damages it was obligated to *148pay because of an “advertising injury.” During the coverage period, it sold goods bearing counterfeit trademarks. In two underlying lawsuits, it was found liable for, inter alia, trademark infringement. The insu
ARNHOLD v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1407 (Filed: September 15, 2025) ************************************* KANDI ARNHOLD, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, *
BEEMAN v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 21-1278; 22-1531 Filed: May 27, 2025 ________________________________________ ) ERIC BEEMAN, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, )
United States v. Bryan Worley Bellewpublic domain
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: In this direct criminal appeal, Bryan Worley Bellew, Appellant, challenges his conviction of attempted bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and of carrying a firearm during the attempted bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the district court and remand the case with instructions for the district court to ente
United States v. Greenepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-4097 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cr-00209- SPG-1 v. NAMIR MALIK ALI GREENE, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the
Rashie v. United Statespublic domain
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAQUAN RASHIE GULLET-EL, Pro Se Plaintiff, Civ. Action No. 24-00521 v. (EGS) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Taquan Rashie, also known as Taquan Rashie Gullet-el and gullet