⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “Munich Re America Services, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC”

District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016-06-15 · Published · cited 4× · 193 F. Supp. 3d 1200; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96782; 2016 WL 3996383
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Southampton Union Free School District, a New York School District’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or to Transfer Venue, filed December 17, 2015 (Doc. 5)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on March 8, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has per
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-10-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021-08-20 · Published · cited 4× · 340 Conn. 266
NORTH SAILS GROUP, LLC v. BOARDS AND MORE GMBH ET AL. (SC 20338) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js.* Syllabus The plaintiff, N Co., sought to recover damages from the defendants, B Co. and E Co., for breach of a trademark licensing agreement, pursuant to which B Co. was granted a worldwide license to use N Co.’s trade name and certain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-07-28 · Published · cited 10× · 638 F. Supp. 2d 394; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68726; 2009 WL 2251311
638 F.Supp.2d 394 (2009) NEWMARKETS PARTNERS LLC et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sal. OPPENHEIM Jr. & CIE et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 4213(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 28, 2009. *397 Bernard Daskal, Esq., Lawrence G. Lee, Esq., Lynch Daskal Emery LLP, New York, NY, L. Peter Farkas, Esq., Richard S. Toikk
In re Qimonda AGpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012-11-07 · Published · cited 1× · 482 B.R. 879; 2012 WL 5430946; 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 5213
MEMORANDUM OPINION BRIAN F. KENNEY, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Foreign Representative’s Motion to Enforce and/or Apply the Automatic Stay (Docket No. 673) in order to enjoin the prosecution of a lawsuit recently filed in the Northern District of California by Altis Semiconductor SNC (“Altis”) against Qim-onda AG (“Qimonda”) and its affiliate, Qimonda Licensing LLC (“Qimonda
In Re Qimonda AGpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011-10-28 · Published · cited 12× · 462 B.R. 165; 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 4191; 55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 195
462 B.R. 165 (2011) In re QIMONDA AG, Debtor. No. 09-14766-SSM. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 28, 2011. *167 G. David Dean, Esquire, Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A., Baltimore, MD, Conflicts counsel for Dr. Michael Jaffé as insolvency administrator for Qimonda AG. Step
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 17× · 444 F. Supp. 2d 68; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58053; 2006 WL 2374458
444 F.Supp.2d 68 (2006) MINEBEA CO., LTD., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Georg PAPST, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-0590 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 17, 2006. *69 *70 *71 *72
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-03-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 01717
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di