⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Multi-Color Corporation”

Ohio Supreme Court · 2019-06-12 · Published · cited 0× · 123 N.E.3d 1038; 2019 Ohio 2261; 156 Ohio St. 3d 1408
Donnelly, J., dissents.
Ohio Supreme Court · 2018-07-31 · Published · cited 0× · 103 N.E.3d 827; 2018 Ohio 3019; 153 Ohio St. 3d 1448
The following cases have been returned to the regular docket under S.Ct.Prac.R. 19.01. The appellant in each case shall file a brief within 40 days, and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.02 through 16.07. As provided in S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.07, the court may dismiss these cases or take other action if the parties fail to timely file merit briefs.
Ohio Supreme Court · 2018-07-09 · Published · cited 0× · 101 N.E.3d 466; 2018 Ohio 2663; 153 Ohio St. 3d 1436
The following cases have been referred to mediation under S.Ct.Prac.R. 19.01.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-05-03 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 Ohio 1714; 111 N.E.3d 773
BRUNNER, J. {¶ 1} Relator, Sharon Vonderheide, filed this original action seeking a writ of mandamus that would order respondent, Industrial Commission of Ohio ("the commission"), to vacate the December 10, 2014 order of its staff hearing officer ("SHO") denying her application for temporary total disability ("TTD") compensation beginning July 31, 2012, and to find she is entitled to th
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 25× · 147 F. Supp. 3d 452; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163720
MEMORANDUM ORDER •Mark S. Davis, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), filed by defendant Sterling Infosystems, Inc. (“Sterling”). EOF No. 21. Sterling’s motion asserts that the civil complaint, filed by Jeffery Scott Ridenour (“Ridenour” or “Plaintiff’), fails to state a claim against Sterling f
Ohio Supreme Court · 2019-04-09 · Published · cited 4× · 2019 Ohio 1270; 128 N.E.3d 188; 156 Ohio St. 3d 403
Per Curiam. *190 *403 {¶ 1} Appellant, Industrial Commission, denied the request of appellee, Sharon Vonderheide, for temporary-total-disability ("TTD") compensation. The
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995-12-29 · Published · cited 13× · 670 N.E.2d 1051; 108 Ohio App. 3d 388
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 390 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 391 This is a workers' compensation case involving entitlement to death benefits. Raymond Jones was employed by defendant-appellee Multi-
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003-01-02 · Published · cited 0× · 301 A.D.2d 708; 753 N.Y.S.2d 555; 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 13, 2001, which assessed BH Multi Color Corporation for additional unemployment insurance contributions. BH Multi Color Corporation, a manufacturer of fine jewelry, challenges a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that BH’s use of claimant’s services as an experienced stone setter created an employment relationship resulting in BH’s liab
Ohio Supreme Court · 2020-09-02 · Published · cited 5× · 161 Ohio St. 3d 373; 163 N.E.3d 534; 2020 Ohio 4269
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Bonnlander v. Hamon, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-4269.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of a
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-06-03 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 Ohio 1890
[Cite as State ex rel. Prater v. Indus. Comm., 2021-Ohio-1890.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Lori R. Prater, : Relator, : v. : No. 19AP-555 Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Respond
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2025-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Meltech Corporation, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 61766, 61767, 61872 ) Under Contract No. W912DR-14-D-0021 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Leonard A. Sacks, Esq. Leonard A. Sacks & Associates, P.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-06-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ohio 2238
[Cite as State ex rel. Saia v. Indus. Comm., 2024-Ohio-2238.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Anthony Saia, : Relator, : v. : No. 22AP-667 Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Responde
Ohio Supreme Court · 2026-02-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ohio 597
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Suburban Driving School, L.L.C. v. Bur. of Workers’ Comp., Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio- 597.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Fr
Ohio Supreme Court · 2020-03-04 · Published · cited 7× · 2020 Ohio 712
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Navistar, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-712.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 4
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973-04-13 · Published · cited 0× · 129 Ga. App. 25; 198 S.E.2d 386; 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 861
Quillian, Judge. The appellee filed a claim against the appellant alleging that the appellant had failed to pay the purchase price of bumper strips which the appellant purchased from the appellee. The case came on for trial and resulted in a judgment for the appellee. Held: The appellant contends the agreed purchase price of the bumper stickers was 3.7 cents per unit. The appellant bases this
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2025-03-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00078-CV ___________________________ NEIL COLLINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH CORPORATION, Appellant V. ROBERT SCOTT HETZLER, CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH CORPORATION, CR ASSEMBLY CORPORA
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KULWINDER KAUR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No.: N19C-07-117 PEL v. ) ) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ) (d/b/a MANSFIELD SCIENTIFIC, INC. & ) MICROVA
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-08-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JERALD HAMMANN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. 2021-0506-PAF ADAMIS PHARMACEUTICALS ) CORPORATION, DENNIS J. CARLO, ) RICHARD C. WILLIAMS, HOWARD C.
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2023-02-10 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 22-388 22-453 Filed: February 10, 2023* FOR PUBLICATION ABACUS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, and VALDEZ INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Consolidated Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Ale
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020-04-29 · Published · cited 221× · 957 F.3d 902
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3707 ___________________________ Danzel Stearns, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Inmate Services Corporation, et al.,