Cases

Reversed and vacated by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINS and Judge GREGORY joined. OPINION WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: This appeal, although arising in the context of Zacarías Moussaoui’s criminal prosecution, 1 is unrelated

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge WILLIAM W. WILKINS announced the judgement of the court and wrote an opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS concurs as to Parts I, II, IV.C.2a. through IV.C.2.C., and Y.A. through V.C., and in which Judge GREGORY concurs except as to Part V.C. Judge WILLIAMS wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, Judge GREGORY wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINS announced the judgment of the court and wrote an opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS concurs, and in which Judge GREGORY concurs except as to Part V.C. Judge WILLIAMS wrote a concurring opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. WILKINS, Chief Judge. The Government appeals a series

453 F.Supp.2d 35 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. I. Lewis LIBBY, Defendant. Criminal No. 05-394(RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 21, 2006. *36 Patrick Fitzgerald, Office of the United States Attorney, Debra R. Bonamici, Office of the Special Counsel, Chicago, IL, Kathleen Kedian, Peter Rober

467 F.Supp.2d 20 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. I. Lewis LIBBY, Defendant. No. CRIM 05-394 RBW. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 22, 2006. *21 *22 Patrick Fitzgerald, Office of the United States Attorney, Debra R. Bonamici, Office of the Special Counsel, Chicag

OPINION GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: This case involves claims by families and estates of the victims of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, individuals injured by the attacks, and various commercial entities that incurred damages and losses as a result of the attacks. The moving defendants are the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (“Saudi Arabia”) and the Saudi High Commission for Relief of B

530 F.Supp.2d 84 (2007) Maria KOUTNY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carla J. MARTIN, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-598 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 31, 2007. *85 *86 A. Mary Schiavo, Motley Rice, LLC, Mt. Pleasant, SC, for Plaintiffs. Roscoe Howard, Jr.,

REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge, concurring in part in judgment and dissenting in part: Today, our court becomes the first to hold that a Bivens action can be maintained against the nation’s two highest ranking law enforcement officials — the Attorney General of the United States and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) — for policies propounded to saf

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 14-­‐‑1124 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-­‐‑Appellant, v. PAUL DAVIS, JR., et al., Defendants-­‐‑Appellees.

549 F.3d 886 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jeffrey ROYER and Amr I Elgindy, also known as Anthony Pacific, also known as Anthony Elgindy, also known as Herbert Manny Velasco, also known as Heriberto Manny Velazco, also known as Tony Elgindy, Defendants-Appellants. Docket Nos. 06-4081-cr(Lead), 06-5165(con), 06-4087-cr(con). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

06-4081-cr(Lead), 06-5165(con), 06-4087-cr(con) USA v. Elgindy UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ------------- August Term, 2008 (Argued: September 3, 2008 Decided: December 17, 2008) Docket Nos. 06-4081-cr(Lead), 06-5165(con), 06-4087-cr(con) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appelle

OPINION OF THE COURT Richard F. Braun, J. The horrors of September 11, 2001 shall remain with those who experienced the events of that infamous day, and the traumatic scars will only slowly heal up in part. The significant effects of September 11 will continue to emanate profoundly for a long, long time. This is a combined CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action brough

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge DUNCAN joined. KING, Circuit Judge. Khaled El-Masri appeals from the dismissal of his civil action against former Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet, three corporate defendants, ten unnamed employees of the Central Intelligence Agency (the “CIA”), and ten unnamed employees of the defendant corporations.<

479 F.3d 296 Khaled EL-MASRI, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Intervenor-Appellee, andGeorge J. Tenet; Premier Executive Transport Services; Keeler & Tate Management Group, LLC; Aero Contractors, Limited; Does 1-20, Defendants.Morton Abramowitz; F. Allen "Tex" Harris; William C. Harrop; Sam Hart; Edward L. Peck; William D. Rogers; Pierre Shostal; E. Michael Southwick; Ward Thompson; Peter Wolcott, Former United S

13‐981 (L) Turkmen, et al. v. Hasty, et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 5 August Term, 2013 6 7 (Argued: May 1, 2014 Decided: June 17, 2015) 8

382 F.Supp.2d 457 (2005) The NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Alberto GONZALES, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and The United States of America, Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 7677(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 24, 2005. As Amended March 2, 2005. *458

GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs in this multidistrict litigation seek to hold multiple defendants liable for allegedly financing, sponsoring, conspiring to sponsor, aiding and abetting, or otherwise providing material support to Osama bin Laden and the terrorist organization known as al Qaeda, for the physical destruction, deaths, and injuries suffered as a result of the terrorist attacks on September 1

483 F.3d 220 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Zacarias MOUSSAOUI, a/k/a Shaqil, a/k/a Abu Khalid al Sahrawi, Defendant, andAll Plaintiffs Named in 21 MC 97, 21 MC 101, and 03 CV 9849, Intervenors-Appellees. No. 06-4611. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: November 30, 2006. Decided: March 14, 2007.