Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Moultrie v. Guy”
People v. Johnsonpublic domain
People v Johnson (2024 NY Slip Op 05811) People v Johnson 2024 NY Slip Op 05811 Decided on November 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
People v. Peakspublic domain
People v Peaks (2022 NY Slip Op 04312) People v Peaks 2022 NY Slip Op 04312 Decided on July 6, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
People v. Ramospublic domain
People v Ramos (2020 NY Slip Op 04414) People v Ramos 2020 NY Slip Op 04414 Decided on August 5, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43
United States v. Lebowitzpublic domain
676 F.3d 1000 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Wayne LEBOWITZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-13349. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 5, 2012. *1006 Richard Sterling Moultrie, Jr., Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, Sally Yates, U.S. Attys., Rodney D. Bullard, Asst U.S. Atty., Atlanta, GA, for
People v. Presleypublic domain
NOTICE 2023 IL App (5th) 230970 Decision filed 12/21/23. The text of this decision may be NOS. 5-23-0970, 5-23-0971, 5-23-0972, 5-23-0974 cons. changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________
Overstreet v. Statepublic domain
312 Ga. 565 FINAL COPY S21A0712. OVERSTREET v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. A Ben Hill County jury found Dabrentise Overstreet1 guilty of malice murder and other offenses in connection with the shooting death of Craigory Burch, Jr., the aggravated assault and armed robbery of Burch’s girlfriend, Jasmine Hendricks, and the aggravated assault of their son, C. B., a minor. On appeal, Overstreet argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to suppor
State Of Washington, V. Frank Edmund Waltonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 83538-6-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION FRANK EDMUND WALTON, Appellant. HAZELRIGG, A.C.J. — Frank Walton appeals convictions for murder in the second degree and tampering with physical evid
Eunice Cristina Rodriguez v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00028-CR EUNICE CRISTINA RODRIGUEZ APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
State Of Washington, V. Frank Edmund Waltonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 83538-6-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. ORDER WITHDRAWING AND FRANK EDMUND WALTON, SUBSTITUTING OPINION Appellant. The court has determined that the opinion filed on February 5, 2024 sh
Com. v. Benitez, M.public domain
J-A22025-18 2019 PA Super 268 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MARCOS A. BENITEZ :
Com. v. Benitez, M.public domain
J-A22025-18 2019 PA Super 268 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MARCOS A. BENITEZ :
People v. Ferrispublic domain
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court People v. Ferris, 2014 IL App (4th) 130657 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caption DUSTIN P. FERRIS, Defendant-Appellee. District & No. Fourth District Docket No. 4-13-0657 Filed April 21, 2014
People v. Thompsonpublic domain
NO. 4-04-0636 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL L. THOMPSON,
State v. Spauldingpublic domain
TEODOSIO, Judge. {¶ 1} Appellant, Dawud Spaulding, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief and motion for testing and related discovery in the Summit County Court of Common Pleas. This Court affirms. I. {¶ 2} In the early morning of December 15, 2011, Mr. Spaulding shot and paralyzed Patrick Griffin while he was leav
United States v. Mahdipublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Defendant Abdur Mahdi has filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his criminal conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Def.’s Mot. to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, Oct. 17, 2011 (“Def.Mot.”).) For the reasons set forth herein, the motion is denied as to all claims except the ine
United States v. Deft. 1public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES, ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 01-396-01 (ESH) ) ABDUR MAHDI, )
Hood v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SAMUEL DER-YEGHIAYAN, District Judge This matter is before the court on Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s (Amtrak) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part, the claims brought against Defendant Jesse Nunez (Nunez) under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Section 1981) are dismissed, and the remaining state law claims are dismis
Brown v. Nucor Corp.public domain
AGEE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I. I concur in the majority opinion as to Section 111(A) (the district court’s determination on the numerosity factor), that portion of Section 111(B)(2) reversing the district court’s judgment as to the hostile work environment claim concerning the commonality factor,1
Howard v. Hornpublic domain
MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Table of Contents I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND .715 II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.715 III. LEGAL STANDARD .716 IV. DISCUSSION.717 A. Claim A: Ineffectiveness for Failure to Reasonably Investigate, Develop, and Present Exculpatory Background and Mental Health Ev
Order JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge. Barry A. Harrison, Wesley T. Roach, and Dwayne M. Hawkins (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination and retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., against their employer, South Carolina Department of Mental Health (“Defendant”). In accordance with 28 U.S.