⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Moultrie v. Guy”

People v. Johnsonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-11-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 05811
People v Johnson (2024 NY Slip Op 05811) People v Johnson 2024 NY Slip Op 05811 Decided on November 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
People v. Peakspublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-07-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 NY Slip Op 04312
People v Peaks (2022 NY Slip Op 04312) People v Peaks 2022 NY Slip Op 04312 Decided on July 6, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
People v. Ramospublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-08-05 · Published · cited 5× · 126 N.Y.S.3d 381; 186 A.D.3d 511; 2020 NY Slip Op 4414
People v Ramos (2020 NY Slip Op 04414) People v Ramos 2020 NY Slip Op 04414 Decided on August 5, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012-04-05 · Published · cited 152× · 676 F.3d 1000; 88 Fed. R. Serv. 86; 2012 WL 1123845; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6859
676 F.3d 1000 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Wayne LEBOWITZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-13349. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 5, 2012. *1006 Richard Sterling Moultrie, Jr., Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, Sally Yates, U.S. Attys., Rodney D. Bullard, Asst U.S. Atty., Atlanta, GA, for
People v. Presleypublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-12-21 · Published · cited 22× · 230 N.E.3d 214; 2023 IL App (5th) 230970
NOTICE 2023 IL App (5th) 230970 Decision filed 12/21/23. The text of this decision may be NOS. 5-23-0970, 5-23-0971, 5-23-0972, 5-23-0974 cons. changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________
Overstreet v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2021-10-05 · Published · cited 12× · 864 S.E.2d 14; 312 Ga. 565
312 Ga. 565 FINAL COPY S21A0712. OVERSTREET v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. A Ben Hill County jury found Dabrentise Overstreet1 guilty of malice murder and other offenses in connection with the shooting death of Craigory Burch, Jr., the aggravated assault and armed robbery of Burch’s girlfriend, Jasmine Hendricks, and the aggravated assault of their son, C. B., a minor. On appeal, Overstreet argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to suppor
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 83538-6-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION FRANK EDMUND WALTON, Appellant. HAZELRIGG, A.C.J. — Frank Walton appeals convictions for murder in the second degree and tampering with physical evid
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2018-09-06 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00028-CR EUNICE CRISTINA RODRIGUEZ APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024-02-12 · Published · cited 3× · 542 P.3d 1041
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 83538-6-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. ORDER WITHDRAWING AND FRANK EDMUND WALTON, SUBSTITUTING OPINION Appellant. The court has determined that the opinion filed on February 5, 2024 sh
Com. v. Benitez, M.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019-09-03 · Published · cited 1× · 2019 Pa. Super. 268
J-A22025-18 2019 PA Super 268 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MARCOS A. BENITEZ :
Com. v. Benitez, M.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019-09-03 · Published · cited 18× · 218 A.3d 460; 2019 Pa. Super. 268
J-A22025-18 2019 PA Super 268 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MARCOS A. BENITEZ :
People v. Ferrispublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014-06-09 · Published · cited 3× · 2014 IL App (4th) 130657
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court People v. Ferris, 2014 IL App (4th) 130657 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caption DUSTIN P. FERRIS, Defendant-Appellee. District & No. Fourth District Docket No. 4-13-0657 Filed April 21, 2014
People v. Thompsonpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005-09-14 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 4-04-0636 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL L. THOMPSON,
State v. Spauldingpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-09-12 · Published · cited 21× · 2018 Ohio 3663; 119 N.E.3d 859
TEODOSIO, Judge. {¶ 1} Appellant, Dawud Spaulding, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief and motion for testing and related discovery in the Summit County Court of Common Pleas. This Court affirms. I. {¶ 2} In the early morning of December 15, 2011, Mr. Spaulding shot and paralyzed Patrick Griffin while he was leav
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-11-25 · Published · cited 3× · 999 F. Supp. 2d 236; 2013 WL 6157881; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166892
MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Defendant Abdur Mahdi has filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his criminal conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Def.’s Mot. to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, Oct. 17, 2011 (“Def.Mot.”).) For the reasons set forth herein, the motion is denied as to all claims except the ine
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-11-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES, ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 01-396-01 (ESH) ) ABDUR MAHDI, )
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014-10-28 · Published · cited 1× · 72 F. Supp. 3d 888; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151943; 125 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 235; 2014 WL 5461506
MEMORANDUM OPINION SAMUEL DER-YEGHIAYAN, District Judge This matter is before the court on Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s (Amtrak) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part, the claims brought against Defendant Jesse Nunez (Nunez) under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Section 1981) are dismissed, and the remaining state law claims are dismis
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-08-07 · Published · cited 82× · 576 F.3d 149; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17643; 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,642; 106 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1718; 2009 WL 2423753
AGEE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I. I concur in the majority opinion as to Section 111(A) (the district court’s determination on the numerosity factor), that portion of Section 111(B)(2) reversing the district court’s judgment as to the hostile work environment claim concerning the commonality factor,1
Howard v. Hornpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014-11-04 · Published · cited 2× · 56 F. Supp. 3d 709; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156528; 2014 WL 5660822
MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Table of Contents I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND .715 II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.715 III. LEGAL STANDARD .716 IV. DISCUSSION.717 A. Claim A: Ineffectiveness for Failure to Reasonably Investigate, Develop, and Present Exculpatory Background and Mental Health Ev
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2014-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 47 F. Supp. 3d 388; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130878; 2014 WL 4700642
Order JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge. Barry A. Harrison, Wesley T. Roach, and Dwayne M. Hawkins (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit alleging discrimination and retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., against their employer, South Carolina Department of Mental Health (“Defendant”). In accordance with 28 U.S.