Cases

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a Notice of Removal from the Circuit Court for the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and Samuel I. White, P.C. (“Trustee” and, collectively with Wells Fargo, “Defendants”), as well as a Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Michele Mos

OPINION BY JENKINS, J.: ¶ 1 Louis I. Spivak (“Spivak”) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County granting Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) motion for summary judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action. We reverse and remand. We conclude that when a residential mortgagee delivers an Act 6 notice, commences a foreclosure act

ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are the Receiver’s Renewed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 228), the opposition of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“the Bank”) (Dkt. 255), the Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. 231), and the Receiver’s opposition (Dkt. 251). As requested, supplemental briefs were filed by the Bank (Dkt.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JACKSON PHILLIP MOSLEY, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 20-3065 (CKK) BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER (September 17, 2021) Plaintiff Jackson Phillip Mosely, proceeding pro se, brings this

ORDER DARRIN P. GAYLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an action claiming defamation. Following the widely publicized departure *1359of former Miami Dolphins offensive lineman Jonathan Martin from the team in the middle of the 2013 football season, the National Football League commissioned Defendant Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Gar

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO ASSERT CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES CHARLES S. MILLER, JR., United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court are defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 24) and plaintiffs motion to amend his complaint to add a claim for punitive damages (Doc. No. 26). For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s moti

123 F.Supp.2d 985 (2000) Jennifer NORMAN, Plaintiff, v. LOOMIS FARGO & CO., Defendant. No. 3:00CV412-H. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 14, 2000. *986 Claire J. Rauscher, Charlotte, NC, Dudley Avery Witt, White and Crumpler, Winston-Salem, NC, for Jennifer Norman. Jackson

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants and Third-Party Defendants Hi-Land Potato Company, Ine.’s, and Carl Worley’s Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees and Costs, filed February 28, 2014 (Doc. 374)(“Motion”); and (ii) Defendant Tan-O-On Marketing, Inc.’s Motion to File Response Out of Time,

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Memorandum of Law in Support, filed April 28, 2017 (Doc. 15) ("MTD"). The Court held a hearing on July 24, 2017. The primary issues are: (i) whether New Mexico's filed rate doctrine bars Plaintiff Helen Bhasker's negligence claims, claims under New Mexico's Unfair Practi

CHIN, J., Concurring and Dissenting. — I agree with the majority that, under the high court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 563 U.S. 333 [179 L.Ed.2d 742, 131 S.Ct. 1740] (Concepcion), the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) (9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) requires enforcement of the class arbitration waiver in the contract between plaintiff Gil Sanchez and defendant Valencia Ho

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DUTY TO DEFEND WM. TERRELL HODGES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is a diversity jurisdiction declaratory judgment insurance coverage action.1 Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment concerning Plaintiff, The Cincinnati Insurance Company’s (“Cincinnati’s”), duty to defend an action brought against its insureds in state court

602 F.Supp.2d 1095 (2009) FARMERS COOPERATIVE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SWIFT PORK COMPANY and LOL Finance Company, Defendants. No. C 07-3056-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. March 16, 2009. *1097 Joseph A. Peiffer, Ronald Curtis Martin, Day, Rettig, Peiffer, PC, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff.

HAYNES, Circuit Judge: After a, jury verdict against it, OneBea-con Insurance Company, (“OneBeacon”) appeals the judgment, including the district court’s denials of OneBeacon’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, and motion for new trial. In addition, T. Wade Welch &. Associates (the ‘Welch Firm”) and T. Wade Welch (“Welch”

787 F.Supp.2d 929 (2011) Wendeline MAGNUSSEN, Plaintiff, v. CASEY'S MARKETING COMPANY, d/b/a Casey's General Store, and Monica Von Seggern, Defendants. No. C 09-4078-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. May 26, 2011. *933 Jay Elliott Denne, Munger, Reinschmidt & Denne, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff.

259 P.3d 542 (2011) June Marie SIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 10CA1137. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. June 9, 2011. *543 Terence J. Quinn, Eagle, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. Wolf & Associates,

830 P.2d 1103 (1992) Charles W. BLACK, Roderick K. Blacker and Edward T. Serle, for themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-on-Intervention, Appellees, v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF FARGO, NORTH DAKOTA, F.A., Defendant/Plaintiff on Counterclaim and Cross-claim, Appellee, v. LA PLATA MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership and Thomas Usher, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs

MARING, Justice, dissenting. [¶ 34] I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. I would affirm the judgment of the trial court. [¶ 35] The majority, without one citation, has reversed the decision of the trial court even though the trial court’s decision follows the majority of jurisdictions in this country that have addressed the issue presented. See Dotts v. Taressa J.A., 1

635 F.Supp.2d 893 (2009) Lisa BEEKMAN, Plaintiff, v. NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C07-3079-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. June 25, 2009. *897 Jill M. Zwagerman, Fiedler & Newkirk, P.L.C., Des Moines, IA, Thomas Andrew Newkirk, Newkirk Law Firm PLC, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintif

715 F.Supp.2d 617 (2010) STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arnold LINCOW et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-5368. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 2, 2010. *623 Cy Goldberg, Matthew A. Moroney, Richard Michael Castagna, Goldberg, Miller & Rubin, PC, Philadelphia, PA,

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed November 18, 2016 (Doc. 71)("First JN Motion"); (ii) Defendants' Second Motion for Judicial Notice in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed February 23, 2017 (Doc. 91)("Second JN Motion"); (iii) Defendants'