Cases

[Cite as State v. Mosley, 2020-Ohio-5047.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 19AP0016 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JOSEPH M. MOSLEY

OPINION The issue is whether a final judgment adjudicating the validity of an existing lien on a homestead is void and subject to collateral attack. Plaintiffs, L.G. Mosley and wife, Jynnifer Mosley, filed suit on March 18, 1993, against defendant, Ticor Title Insurance Company of California, seeking a declaratory judgment that a deed of trust lien upon the Mosley's homestead was void. Ticor filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the Mosleys were col

11th Court of Appeals 11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Opinion Michael and Donna Mosley Appellants

Gordon McCloud, J. ¶1 Curtis Guy Stump was convicted of possession of heroin following a bench trial. He filed a notice of appeal. Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 27. The trial court then appointed a lawyer to represent Stump on the appeal at public expense. ¶2 That lawyer, however, did not file a brief in support of Stump’s appeal. Instead, Mr. Stump’s appointed lawyer moved to withdraw and filed an Anders

Wiggins, J. ¶17 (dissenting) — Has a suspect unequivocally invoked his right to remain silent when he tells police “I don’t want to talk right now”? The majority answers this *416question in the negative, and I respectfully dissent. We should hold that Samuel Piatnitsky unequivocally invoked his right to remain silent when he said those very words during a police interrogat

BADALAMENTI, Judge. B.M. appeals his final disposition of delinquency for (1) resisting an officer without violence and (2) burglary of an unoccupied structure. The basis of the resisting-without-violence charge was B.M.’s flight from a purportedly lawful Terry1 stop. The State used this same alleged nonviolent resistance to satisfy the intent element of B.M.’s burglary charge. B.M. contends that

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT B.M., ) ) Appellant, )

PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on appeal by Jason Walton from an order denying a motion to vacate sentences of death under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. Walton also petitions this Court for writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const. For the reasons explained below, we affirm the postconviction court's denial of relief and

Gordon McCloud, J. ¶37 (concurring) — I agree with the majority that this is a case about stare decisis. The petitioner, Nakia Lee Otton, concedes that the Court of Appeals’ decision is correct under this court’s holding in State v. Smith, 97 Wn.2d 856, 863, 651 P.2d 207 (1982), and he asks *691us to overrule that holding. Thus, this case requires us to decide

Thi~Rinion was filed fo( record at ~ OD CLM onApnt z.rt} 2.QJ LLp .d~r:j.~

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC16-448 ____________ JASON DIRK WALTON, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ____________ No. SC17-1083

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0134p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaint

708 S.E.2d 48 (2011) GORDON DOCUMENT PRODUCTS, INC. v. SERVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al. No. A10A1883. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 16, 2011. *50 Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs, J. Marbury Rainer, Linda G. Carpenter, Atlanta, for appellant. Ford & Harrison, Rachel R. Krause, Valeria R. Cometto, John L. Monroe

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON MARCH 19, 2026 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON MARCH 19, 2026 SARAH R. PENDLETON

191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II

349 S.W.3d 621 (2011) ASPENWOOD APARTMENT CORP., Appellant, v. COINMACH, INC., f/k/a Solon Automated Services, Inc., Appellee. No. 01-08-00636-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). February 10, 2011. *626 Alan Brandt Daughtry, Jackson Walker L.L.P., Jack Z. Yetiv, Houston, TX, for Appellant. Daniel W. Davis,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0247p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appellee,

*794BEA, Circuit Judge, concurring in part, dissenting in part: I concur in the majority’s holding that Anderson unambiguously invoked his privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Anderson repeatedly invoked his right to remain silent — “I don’t e

Affirmed; Memorandum Opinion of February 8, 2007, Withdrawn; Corrected Memorandum Opinion filed March 22, 2007 Affirmed; Memorandum Opinion of February 8, 2007, Withdrawn; Corrected Memorandum Opinion filed March 22, 2007.

PER CURIAM. C.E.L. seeks review of the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in C.E.L. v. State, 995 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in D.T.B. v. State, 892 So.2d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The issue presented in this case is