Cases

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Moshe Rozenblit v. Marcia V. Lyles (A-41/42-19) (083434) Argued October 13, 2020 -- Decided February 3, 2021 PATTERSON, J., writing for the Court. In this a

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Moshe Rozenblit v. Marcia V. Lyles (A-41/42-19) (083434) Argued October 13, 2020 -- Decided February 3, 2021 PATTERSON, J., writing for the Court. In this a

722 F.Supp. 415 (1989) Diane OSTERBERG and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, the State Employees' Retirement System, Michael Mory, Joseph Pisano, Doris Clark and Edward Ference, both officially and personally, Defendants. No. 87 C 3958. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. April 6, 1989.

621 F.Supp.2d 165 (2009) In re: INTEL CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 08-93-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 4, 2009. *168 Joseph H. Weiss, Esquire; David C. Katz, Esquire; Moshe Balsam, Esquire and Ilya Nuzov, Esquire of Weiss & Lurie, Jules, Brody, Esquire of Stull, Stull & Brody, New Yor

B&H Flooring, LLC v Folger (2024 NY Slip Op 03400) B&H Flooring, LLC v Folger 2024 NY Slip Op 03400 Decided on June 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar

Blue Lagoon, LLC v Reisman (2023 NY Slip Op 01657) Blue Lagoon, LLC v Reisman 2023 NY Slip Op 01657 Decided on March 29, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

KANNE, Circuit Judge. David Mendelovitz brought this shareholder derivative suit on behalf of Comdisco, Inc. against ten of Comdiseo’s directors, alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). Men-delovitz’ suit, at bottom, is based on a lease dispute between Comdisco and International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”). Comdisco is the world’s largest independent leasing company o

167 F.Supp.2d 639 (2001) Siamac SEDIGHIM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, INC., Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp., Credit Suisse Group, Diamond Acquisition Corp., AXA S.A., AXA Financial, Inc., the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, John S. Chalsty, Joe L. Roby, Stuart M. Robbins, David F. Deluca, Henri De Castries, Denis Duverne, Jane

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER COGAN, District Judge. This action, in which plaintiff brings civil RICO claims predicated on violations of various human trafficking prohibitions contained in Chapter 77 of Title 18 of the United States Code, is before me on motions to dismiss by four of the named defendants. Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint against 13 individuals and entities, as well as

517 F.Supp. 403 (1981) BARCLAYS BANK OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. Gordon GOLDMAN and Ruhama Goldman, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. DANKNER DIAMONDS (ISRAEL) LTD., Moshe Dankner and Yoram Dankner, Third-Party Defendants. 80 Civ. 2546 (JMC). United States District Court, S. D. New York. June 22, 1981. *404

289 F.Supp.2d 416 (2003) In re MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. RESEARCH REPORTS SECURITIES LITIGATION In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. eToys, Inc. Research Reports Securities Litigation In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Homestore.com Research Reports Securities Litigation In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. iVillage, Inc. Research Reports Securities Litigation In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Lifeminders Research Reports Securities

OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.: In this appeal from the judgment entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Plaintiff/Appellant Portside Investors (“Portside”) contends the court sitting as fact-finder in a non-jury trial erred in finding in favor of Defendant/Appellee Northern Insurance Company of New York (“Northern”) on Portside’s claim that Northern acted in statutory bad faith in investigating a

OPINION COLE, Circuit Judge. After a delay in receiving dermatologist-recommended treatments for a painful skin condition, inmate Oscar Santiago sued his prison doctors under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He claimed violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. The district court initially denied the doctors’ motion for summary jud

OPINION OF THE COURT Angiolillo, J.P The parties have been involved in a long-standing dispute regarding the Town of Carmel’s regulation of the defendants’ commercial marina pursuant to the Town’s zoning ordinance. The marina is located on Lake Mahopac, a navigable lake owned by the State of New York. In this, the latest chapter in the parties’ dispute, the Town sought to enjoin the defendants’ use of cert

OPINION OF THE COURT Angiolillo, J.P The parties have been involved in a long-standing dispute regarding the Town of Carmel’s regulation of the defendants’ commercial marina pursuant to the Town’s zoning ordinance. The marina is located on Lake Mahopac, a navigable lake owned by the State of New York. In this, the latest chapter in the parties’ dispute, the Town sought to enjoin the defendants’ use of cert

MINER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees Eliezer Moshe Malek and Malke Malek (“the Ma-leks”) appeal from a judgment entered after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Gagliardi, J.) dismissing their complaint. The Maleks, a married couple, commenced this action to recover the proceeds of their fire insurance policy after defendant-appel-

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. After careful review of the record, we adopt the analysis of the district court’s Memorandum Decision and Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Granting in Part Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment, and Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. We therefore AFFIRM for substantially the reasons given by the district court and ORDER the district court’s memorandum d

329 F.Supp.2d 1319 (2004) The WILLIAMS ISLAND SYNAGOGUE, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF AVENTURA, Defendant. No. 04-20257. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. August 3, 2004. *1320 Lawrence R. Metsch, Metsch & Metsch, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff. Harriet R. Lewis, Weiss Serota Helfman Pastoriza Guedes Cole &

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, United States District Judge Appellant BB Holding Group, LLC ("BBHG") appeals from an August 17, 2017 Order entered by United States Bankruptcy Judge Shelley C. Chapman that approved a global settlement agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") in two related bankruptcy proceedings: a Chapter 11 petition signed by Melvin ("Mel") Cooper and filed on behalf of Imperial Capital LLC ("Imperial"), and a Chapter 7 pet

808 F.2d 601 Don SERPAS, Raymond Johnson and Carl Waters, individuallyand on behalf of all others similarly situated,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Charles E. SCHMIDT, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 85-2393. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued April 2, 1986.Decided Dec. 19, 1986. Esc