Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN J. McCONNELL, JR., District Judge. Before the Court are three motions for summary judgment: (1) Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 56); (2) Defendants Bernard Wasserman, David Wasserman, and Richard Wasserman’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 70); and (3) Defendants David Wasserman and Richard Wasserman’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF

McDonald, j. The charter of the Respondent Town of Hurlock provides that the Mayor is to appoint “the heads of all office, department, and agencies” of the Town with the approval of the Town Council. Those officials then “serve at the pleasure of the Mayor.” In 2009, the Mayor-elect of the Town entered into a written employment agre

Bel Air Carpet, Inc. v. Korey Homes Building Group, LLC, et al. No. 1006, Sept. Term, 2019 Opinion by Leahy, J. Negligence > Duty of Care > Economic Loss Doctrine Maryland has adopted the economic loss doctrine, which generally precludes tort liability for “negligence that causes purely economic harm in the absence of privity, physical injury, or risk of physical injury.” Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. Rummel Klepper & Kahl, LLP, 451 Md. 600, 611 (2017). Negligence > Duty of Care > Ec

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 19-2116 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. NAVIENT CORP; NAVIENT SOLUTIONS LLC Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 3-17-cv-01814) Distri

TRIAL OPINION THOMAS J. TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge. I.Introduction In this adversary proceeding, Plaintiff Joyce McCallum seeks a determination that Defendant Debtor Steven Pixley’s judgment debt to McCallum is non-dis-chargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) for fraud, and under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) for “willful and malicious injury.” Eighteen months before Pixley filed his Chapter 7 ba

SPATT, District Judge: On or about November 27, 2013, Brown Media Corporation ("Brown Media") and Roy E. Brown ("Roy") (together, the "Plaintiffs") commenced this action against K & L Gates, LLP ("KLG"), Edward M. Fox ("Fox", together with KLG the "Defendants") as well as a recently dismissed individual defendant, Eric T. Moser. The claims in this action arise from a related bankruptcy proceeding. Therefore, the

OPINION ESPINOSA, Chief Judge. ¶ 1 In this special action, Tanque Verde Unified School District No. 13 of Pima County challenges the respondent judge’s rulings that the District’s board violated Arizona’s open meeting laws in selecting a site on which to build a high school and that the District may not use funds from the Arizona School Facilities Board (SFB) to pay severance damages in a conde

406 B.R. 778 (2009) In re Devon Loraine GROVE-MERRITT aka, Devon L. Dullaghan, Debtor. Ruth A. Slone, Trustee, Plaintiff v. Harvey Christophe Lassiter, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-31887. Adversary No. 08-3068. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. June 2, 2009. *784 Harvey Christophe Lassite

76 P.3d 874 (2003) 206 Ariz. 200 TANQUE VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 13 OF PIMA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Petitioner, v. Hon. Deborah BERNINI, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Pima, Respondent, and Tanque Verde Coalition, Inc., an Arizona not-for-profit corporation; Timothy Miles and Laura Miles, husband and wife; James Jones and Penelope

ACCEPTED 03-14-00304-CV 5460354 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00304-CV 5395094

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO TANQUE VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL ) DISTRICT NO. 13 OF PIMA COUNTY, ) a political subdivision of the State of ) Arizona, ) ) Petitioner, ) 2 CA-SA 2003-0067

422 B.R. 783 (2009) In re TOUSA, INC., et al., Debtors. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Citicorp North America, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-10928-JKO. Adversary No. 08-1435-JKO. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division. October 30, 2009. *

ORDER G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing the Claims of Non-Party Bondholders (Doc. 644) and the Underwriters’ Motion to Exclude the Report and Testimony of Robert M. Smith (Doc. 774). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and the Motion to Exclude is denied with

377 F.2d 700 67-1 USTC P 12,467 Samuel H. SALISBURY, as Executor Under the Will of Ora S.Hitchcock, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 29, Docket 30453. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued Sept. 20, 1966.Decided May 8, 1967.

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL

82 B.R. 258 (1987) In re VERMONT TOY WORKS, INC., Debtor. CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SEBERT LUMBER, CO., INC., Defendant, J.C. Palmisano, Esq., Trustee and Intervening Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 85-252, Adv. P. No. 86-0007. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont. December 23, 1987. *259

MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW OF PHASE I, PHASE II AND PHASE III AND ORDERS TO CLERK VOLUME I OF TWO VOLUMES, containing: Complete Table of Contents for both volumes Pages 385 to 462, inclusive. TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I PHASE I PAGE Introduction 385 PHASE I FINDINGS OF FA

510 F.Supp. 381 (1981) In re MIDWEST MILK MONOPOLIZATION LITIGATION. Robert B. ALEXANDER et al., Plaintiffs, v. The NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION, INC., et al., Defendants, v. ASSOCIATED MILK PRODUCERS, INC., et al., Counterclaim Defendants. JPML Docket No. 83. Civ. No. 19191-1. United States District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D. January 29, 1981.