Cases

MEMORANDUM *** Sheila Morse appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the denial of her application of Social Security disability benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and review de novo the district court’s judgment. See, e.g., Ryan v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 528 F.3d 1194, 1198 (9th Cir.2008). “The Social Security Administration’s disability deter

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR E. BIANCHINI, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In December of 2010, Plaintiff Jeffrey B. Morse applied for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under the Social Security Act, alleging disability due to several physical and psychological impairments. The Commissioner of Social Security denied the application. Pla

ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. Introduction The plaintiff, Sandra Dee Morrison, seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying her applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and disabled widow’s benefits under Title II and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of t

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Steven Mack seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying Mack’s claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) as a person disabled and unable to engage in substantial gainful activity. Both parties move for summary judgment. The issues are (1) whether the

809 F.Supp.2d 13 (2010) Patricia McINTIRE, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Defendant. No. 3:07cv1534 (SRU). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 9, 2010. *14 John P. Spilka, Connecticut Legal Services, Inc., New Britain, CT, Thomas M. Ford, Connecticut Legal Services, Waterbury, CT, for Plaintiff. Ann M

662 F.Supp.2d 1122 (2009) Retha Mae STALKUP, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 4:08-cv-302 RP-CFB. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. August 19, 2009. *1123 Christopher D. Hagen, U.S. Attorney's Office, Des Moines, IA, for Defendant. Thomas A. Krause, W

626 F.Supp.2d 921 (2009) Gregory R. RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil No. 07-4202 (RHK/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. January 26, 2009. *924 Edward C. Olson, Attorney at Law, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff. Lonnie F. Bryan, United States Attorney'

MEMORANDUM David A. Leslie appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration that he was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act and thus not entitled to disability benefits. We affirm in part, and reverse and remand for further proceedings. I The administrative law judge (ALJ) did not err in determining that

MEMORANDUM David A. Leslie appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration that he was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act and thus not entitled to disability benefits. We affirm in part, and reverse and remand for further proceedings. I The administrative law judge (ALJ) did not err in determining that

728 F.Supp.2d 168 (2010) Candy L. HICKMAN, on behalf of M.A.H., Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE[*], Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 7:07-CV-1077 (NAM/VEB). United States District Court, N.D. New York. July 27, 2010. *170 Conboy, McKay, Bachman & Kendall, LLP, Peter L. Walton, Esq., of Counsel, Water

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Daniel Morse v. Civil No. 15-cv-382-LM Opinion No. 2016 DNH 095 Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Daniel Morse moves to reverse the Acting Commissioner’s decision to deny his application for Social Securit

ORDER OF DISMISSAL JEROME B. SIMANDLE, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendant the Social Security Administration’s (hereinafter, the “SSA”) unopposed motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiffs Raymond and Aleeia Glenn’s (hereinafter, “Plaintiffs”) Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).1 [Docket Item 3.] For the re

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KIRK E. WEBSTER, SR., Plaintiff, Case No. 1:16-cv-02114-CRC v. JAMES N. MATTIS, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, et. al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Pro se plaintiff Kirk Webster has filed this suit under Ti

ORDER SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on a consolidated appeal from orders of the Middle District of Florida Bankruptcy Court, in which the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Plans of Reorganization of individual Debtors/Appellees James John Big-gins, Kristin R. Biggins, Kimberly Rae Norton, Michael Biggins, Elizabeth Big-gins, James E. Biggins, and Shirley R. Big

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR E. BIANCHINI, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In August of 2009, Plaintiff Derek J. Giancola applied for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits and Child’s Disability Benefits1 under the Social Security Act. The Commissioner of Social Security denied the applications. Plaintiff, repre

ORDER REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY TO DENY PLAINTIFF SUPPLEMENTAL SOCIAL SECURITY INCOME AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Alan C. Kay, Senior United States District Judge For the reasons set forth below, the Court REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS to the ALJ for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Order. BACKGRO

ORDER JEFFREY L. VIKEN, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Willa Quick Bear filed a complaint appealing from an administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying disability benefits. (Docket 1). Defendant1 denies plaintiff is entitled to benefits. (Docket 9). The court issued a briefing schedule requiring the parties to file a joint statement of material

ORDER JEFFREY L. YIKEN, CHIEF JUDGE INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Darcie Stickler filed a complaint appealing from an administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying disability insurance benefits. (Docket 1). Defendant denies plaintiff is entitled to benefits. (Docket 5). The court issued a briefing schedule requiring the parties to file a joint statement of material facts (“JSMF”). (Dock

ORDER Bernardo P. Velasco, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff April Rebecca Estrella has filed the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. 1). The Magistrate Judge has *1095jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the parties’ consent.. (Doc. 11).

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Presently pending, and ready for resolution in this employment discrimination case are several motions: the motion for recusal filed by pro se Plaintiff Starsha Monet Sewell (ECF No. 23); the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Strayer University, Inc. (“Strayer”)1 (ECF No. 7); and the motion for summary judgmen