Cases

919 N.E.2d 354 (2009) 233 Ill.2d 563 MORRIS v. PHILLIPS. Nos. 108849, 108859. Supreme Court of Illinois. Sepetmber 1, 2009. Disposition of Petition for Leave to Appeal[*] Denied. NOTES [*] For Cumulative Leave to Appeal Tables see preliminary pages of advance sheets and Annual Illinois Cumulative Leave to Appeal Ta

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an oral contract, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), entered June 26, 1998, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the first and fourth causes of action as barred by the Statute of Frauds. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, dated September 24, 199

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 19, 2013 Session KRISTINA MORRIS v. JIMMY PHILLIPS, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 11C3082 Joseph P. Binkley, Jr., Judge No. M2013-00417-COA-R9-CV - Filed December 17, 2013 A multi-vehicle accident occurred in August 2010. The plaintiff initially named on

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SARA LIOI, District Judge. Before the Court is the motion of defendant Philip Morris USA Inc. (“PM USA”) for judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. No. 47.) Plaintiff opposes the motion (Doc. No. 60), and defendant filed a reply. (Doc. No. 62.) Also before the Court is plaintiffs motion for class certification. (Doc. No. 82.) Defendant *35

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SARA LIOI, District Judge. Before the Court are two dispositive motions: defendants’ motion for partial judgment on the pleadings on plaintiffs’ class action claim under the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (CSPA), Ohio Rev.Code § 1345.01 et seq. (Doc. No. 16); and defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on plaintiffs’ claim under the Ohio Deceptive Trade Pr

420 B.R. 530 (2009) In re Gary Dean PHILLIPS, and Carla Marie Phillips, Debtors. J. Michael Morris, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. PHH Mortgage Services, and Gary D. Phillips and Carla M. Phillips, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 06-11573. Adversary No. 08-5014. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas. December 21, 2009. *531 J. Michael

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 23, 2005 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 23, 2005. In The<

PER CURIAM. Jeffery Phillips appeals the summary denial o¡f his motion for postcoriviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the postconviction court’s order fails to conclusively refute Mr. Phillips’ claims for relief, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. Background

WINTER, Circuit Judge: The principal question on appeal is whether New York state court decisions affirming sentences enhanced under New York’s persistent felony offender (“PFO”) statute, N.Y. Penal Law § 70.10, unreasonably applied clearly established federal law. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). The district court issued a writ of habeas corpus in the petitions of Ca

05-4375-pr; 06-3550-pr; 07-1599-pr; 07-3588-pr; 07-3949-pr Besser v. Walsh; Phillips v. Artus; Portalatin v. Graham; Morris v. Artus; Washington v. Poole 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 AUGUST TERM, 2007 4 (Argued in Tandem: April 16, 2008 Decided: March 31, 2010) 5 Docket Nos. 05-4375-pr, 06-3550-pr, 07-1599-pr, 07-3588-pr, 6

CASANUEVA, Judge. James David Phillips appeals his judgments and sentences for sexual battery on a person less than twelve years of age and lewd and lascivious molestation on a person less than twelve years of age. He raises several issues on appeal, but we find merit only in his argument that his judgment for lewd and lascivious molestation should be remanded to omit the language stating that the victim was less than twelve

Ray, Judge. Woodie M. Montgomery appeals from a trial court order holding her in contempt and from the order she allegedly violated, which served as the basis for the trial court’s contempt finding. Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the contempt order, we reverse. The parties in the instant action, appellant Montgomery and her brother, appellee Walter S. Morris, are involved in long-run

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

966 F.2d 676 Morrisv.Chaffe, McCall, Phillips* NO. 91-3320 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. June 05, 1992 1 Appeal From: E.D.La. 2

PER CURIAM. Katrell Morris has filed an application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3), seeking authorization to file a successive motion to vacate under § 2255. Morris was sentenced as an armed career criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) and now wants to challenge his sentence under Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), which held that the residual clause of the Armed Career Crimi

SUAREZ, J. Elsa Chacon ("Chacon"), as the Personal Representative of the Estate of her husband Robiel Chacon, brought a wrongful death action against Philip Morris.1 Chacon brings this appeal from an adverse final judgment in favor of Philip Morris. This appeal presents a legal issue of first impression for the Engle line of tobacco cases, which issue is the proper interpretation of the phrase "

McDONALD, J. This case is the second of two diversity actions in which the federal courts certified questions for this court's advice regarding the viability of an action under Connecticut's Product Liability Act (act) 1 alleging that a cigarette's design had increased consumers' risk of cancer. The courts s

ORDER Darren D’Wayne Morris sued a number of prison officials, claiming that he missed meals, showers, and recreation time because his hearing disability prevented him from complying with prison rules. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. We affirm. *688The facts are uncontested. Morris is a Wisconsin prisoner who was housed in the

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CT-00073-SCT GLORIA BAKER, CONNIE CORNWALL, CAROLYN GREER, DANIEL MORRIS, AND JUDY TRAVIS v. RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES INC., LOGAN B. PHILLIPS JR., AND STEVEN KANE SAVELL ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/06/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JEFF WEILL, SR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: FRANK CHANDLER BREESE, III STEVIE FARRAR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-01132-COA MELCHESTER PHILLIPS JR., SARAH PHILLIPS, APPELLANTS KEITH PHILLIPS, NIKKI HOBSON, GAIL CAMPER, CAROLYN MOJGANI, CARLOS WILBORN, CHRISTOPHER WILBORN, KIM WILBORN, MICHAEL WATTS, MARK WATTS, TRACY WILBORN, EDDIE YOUNG III, CHERYL YOUNG, CAROL SUTTON, LYNETTE MYERS, KEVIN SMITH, MARY SMITH, MORRIS LOUISVILLE, SHANINA BRIDGES, NATASHA SMITH, BRIAN SMITH,