Cases

In re Morris, Jed L. M.D.; — -Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 415,512, 433,003, 433,004; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No(s). 2005 CA 2117, 2005 CA 2118, 2005 CA 2119. Denied. KNOLL, J., would grant.

In re Holcomb, Robert S. et a!.; Evans, Nancy H.; Delaney, Marian H.; Malone, Beth H.; Metropolitan Life Insurance;— Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiora-ri and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 415,512, 433,003, 433,004; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No(s). 2005 CA 2117, 2005 CA 2119, 2005 CA 2118. Denied.

*167In re Holcomb, Robert S. et al.; Delaney, Marian H.; Evans, Nancy H.; Malone, Beth H.; Holcomb, Ann Mrs. Estate of; Metropolitan Life Insurance; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 415,512, 433,003, 433,004; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No(s). 2005 CA 1932, 2005 CA 1933, 2005 CA 1934.

343 S.W.3d 205 (2011) ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC., Appellant, v. Celia GILLIES, Individually, and as Next Friend of Edward Allan Ortega, a Minor and Heir to the Estate of Rebecca T. Castaneda, Appellee. No. 05-09-00150-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. April 26, 2011. Rehearing Overruled July 26, 2011. *207 D

PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE This is a products liability case where Barbara Kaiser claimed to have been substantially and permanently injured by a mesh product that was implanted in her vagina to treat her pelvic organ prolapse. The mesh product was designed and manufactured by defendants Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc. After a two week trial, the jury agreed with Mrs. Kaiser and found in her favor on her failure to warn and desi

FILED 15-0975 12/21/2015 7:10:33 PM tex-8333751 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, C

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FORTIS ADVISORS LLC, solely in its ) capacity as representative of former ) stockholders of Auris Health, Inc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0881-LWW ) JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, ) INC., ALEX GO

Lauriat, Peter M., J. Ethicon Endo-Surgeiy, Inc. (“EES”), a medical device company, has brought this action against a former employee, Robert Pemberton (“Pemberton”), asserting claims of breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and misappropriation and threatened misappropriation of trade secrets. EES has also brought suit against Pemberton’s new employer, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (“Intuitiv

803 F.Supp.2d 781 (2011) Roy KULICK, M.D., Plaintiff, v. ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 1:09-CV-00167. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. March 23, 2011. *782 Martin McHenry, Haverkamp Rebold & Riehl Co LPA, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiff. Deborah S. Brenneman, Keith P. Spill

Opinion KENNARD, J. Plaintiff was a cigarette smoker for 35 years, from 1953 through 1987. In 1989, she was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which plaintiff knew was caused by her smoking habit. Nevertheless, she did not sue the manufacturers of the cigarettes that she had smoked, and the statutory period for doing so elapsed. </

670 F.Supp.2d 1014 (2009) Leslie L. GRISHAM, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV 02-7930 SVW (RCx). United States District Court, C.D. California. October 7, 2009. *1018 Frances M. Phares, Baum Hedlund Aristei Goldman & Menzies, Covington, LA, J. Clark Aristei, Michael L. Baum, Baum Hedlund Aristei G

54 Cal.Rptr.3d 735 (2007) 40 Cal.4th 623 151 P.3d 1151 Leslie J. GRISHAM et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A., INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S132772. Supreme Court of California. February 15, 2007. *736 Baum, Hedliund, Aristei & Guilford, Bau

Justice BAER, concurring. I concur in the Court’s order vacating the Commonwealth Court’s order and remanding for the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. TAP Pharm. Prods. Inc., — Pa.-, 94 A.8d 350, 2014 WL 2728008 (Pa.2014) (Baer, J. concurring)(indieating my view that a remand is warranted for further consideration of the case in light of the OAJC’s analysis of the rebate

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Justice SAYLOR. This case is among a number of civil actions brought by state attorneys general against pharmaceutical companies nationwide challenging the propriety of prescription drug pricing, in particular, as it impacts third-party reimbursement for brand-name drug purchases subsidized by government social welfare programs. The Commonwealth has ce

(2008) CORDIS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., Boston Scientific Corporation, and Scimed Life Systems, Inc., Defendants. Boston Scientific Corporation and Scimed Life Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Ethicon, Inc., Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems Co., Defendants. Civ. Nos. 97-550-SLR, 98-19-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware.<

336 F.Supp.2d 363 (2004) CORDIS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MEDTRONIC AVE, INC., Boston Scientific Corporation and Scimed Life Systems, Inc., Defendants. Medtronic Ave, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Cordis Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Expandable Grafts Partnership, Defendants. Boston Scientific Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Ethicon, Inc., Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems Co., Defendants.

Case: 23-1864 Document: 93 Page: 1 Filed: 07/14/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SHOCKWAVE MEDICAL, INC., Appellant v. CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC., Cross-Appellant COKE MORGAN STEWART, ACTING UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT

BRYSON, Circuit Judge. The term electrosurgery refers to a surgical technique in which high frequency electrical current is applied to cut or ablate body tissue. There are two forms of elec-trosurgical devices, monopolar and bipolar. In monopolar devices, electric current passes from a single exposed electrode into the body tissue that is to be ablated. The current then passes t

Case: 21-2299 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 09/15/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2021-2299, 2021-2338 _________________

JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United States District Judge *750On July 2, 2015, Western Plastics, Inc., ("WP" or "plaintiff") filed this action against DuBose Strapping, Inc., ("DuBose" or "defendant") alleging patent infringement [D.E. 1]. On September 8, 2017, DuBose moved for partial summary judgment [D.E. 49]. On October 9, 2017, WP moved for partial summary judgment on