Cases

954 F.Supp. 1138 (1996) Morris W. CRABTREE, Plaintiff, v. BHK OF AMERICA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-0045-D. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Danville Division. September 17, 1996. *1139 Alan T. Gravitt, Elizabeth S. Byrd-Roberts, Gravitt & Gravitt, P.C., Halifax, VA, for plaintiff. Morris Wilson Crabtr

After Remand from the Supreme Court This court's prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex parte CrabtreeIndustrial Waste, Inc., 728 So.2d 155 (Ala. 1998). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. All the judges concur.

I believe the summary judgment was correct and thus should be affirmed. Therefore I respectfully dissent. I agree with the trial court's assessment of the issue of resipsa loquitur: "The Court concludes the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply in this case for two reasons. As an initial matter, the defendant did not have full management and control of the truck and the tire for the relevant period of time. The evid

LANIER, Judge. This is a suit for damages in tort alleging that an employee of a nonprofit country club was injured when the negligence of a member of the Board of Directors of the country club caused the club stove to explode and injure the employee. Made de*923fendants in the suit were the director, his personal liability insurer and the country club’s insurer. The

*1298Opinion COOPER, P. J. Arthur George Crabtree appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of felony attempted lewd act upon a child under age 14 (Pen. Code, §§ 288, subd. (a), 664; count 1 (“Hope”)).1 Felony attempted sending harmful matter to minor (§§ 288.2, subd. (b), 66

MORRIS, Judge. Defendant’s first assignment of error relates to the overruling of his motions to quash the warrant and the denial of *493his motion in arrest of judgment. It is defendant’s contention that G.S. 20-141 (c) forbids or requires conduct in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Douglas D. Crabtree and Patrick H. Cray were convicted of three counts of misapplication of bank funds, one count of conspiracy to misapply bank funds, and two counts of interstate transportation of goods obtained by fraud. The district court sentenced each of them to one ten-year prison term, two consecutive five-year prison terms (which were to run concur

BOEHM, Justice. The plaintiffs in this case were injured in an accident as passengers in a car driven by their father while he was intoxicated. After their father died of unrelated causes, the children brought this suit against his estate. We hold that Indiana law does not permit recovery of punitive damages from a decedent's estate. We also hold that under the terms of this policy, the final judgment should exclude damages

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Douglas D. Crabtree and Patrick H. Cray were convicted on three counts of misapplication of bank funds, one count of conspiracy to misapply bank funds, and two counts of interstate transportation of goods obtained by fraud. Each was subsequently sentenced to one ten-year prison term, two consecutive five-year prison terms which would run concurrent to the t

MORGAN, Judge. Defendant has appealed from the judgment of the trial court finding him to be a criminal sexual psychopath as defined in Section 202.700, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. The information, by which defendant was originally charged with a criminal offense, alleged that he “did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously indulge in degrading, lewd, and immoral practices with a minor.” This generalization was supp

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 20, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D18-341 Lower Tribunal No. 11-23377 ________________ Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al.,

OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING BANKRUPTCY COURT’S MARCH 26, 2014 ORDER DISMISSING APPELLANT’S ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge. This is an appeal from a March 26, 2014 Bankruptcy Court order dismissing Appellant Gwendolyn Alien-Morris’ (“Alien-Morris”) adversary proceeding against Ap-pellee Nicholas Financial, Inc. The Bankruptcy Court dismissed the adversary proceeding pursuant to Federal

Mallakd, C.J. Appellant has only four exceptions and three assignments of error. Defendant’s exception number one is that “(d)efendant objects and excepts to the Findings of Fact for the reason that they are not, sufficient to support the conclusions of law and the judgment.” There was no exception made to any particular finding of fact. This exception is broadside and does not present for review the adm

805 P.2d 1 (1991) 248 Kan. 33 STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Tommy Joe CRABTREE, Appellant. No. 62913. Supreme Court of Kansas. January 18, 1991. *2 Thomas Jacquinot, Asst. Appellate Defender, argued the cause, and Jessica R. Kunen, Chief Appellate Defender, was with him on the brief, for appellant.

DAVIS, Chief Justice, dissenting: In this case the appellant, Claude Ray Morris, presented a single assignment of error in his brief. Mr. Morris asked this Court to order his transfer to the psychiatric facility at William Sharpe State Hospital. The majority opinion has elected to ignore the relief prayed for in Mr. Morris’ brief and has, instead, determined that his convictions and sentences should be vacated

SULLIVAN, Judge, dissenting. The majority's approval of the May, 4, 1982 entry, search and seizure compels my dissent. The defendants correctly contend that all of the evidence seized in the May 4, 1982 entry and search of their motel suite should have been suppressed because the officers executing the search warrant failed to knock and announce their identity and purpose prior to entry. Th

Matthew Kelly died on June 4th, 1932 leaving a last Will and Testament which was admitted to probate in the county court of Dickey county. On June 27th, 1932, B.R. Crabtree was appointed executor. The Will provides for the following bequests: "I give and bequeath to my brother, Patrick Kelly the sum of $16,000 under the following conditions: — The sum of $500 to be paid within one year after my decease and the further sum of $500 to be paid within two years after by decease. The balance

Mason, J. After a bench .trial in Superior Court, judgment was entered for the defendant, Roger Morris, dismissing the claim of the plaintiff, Upper Cape Realty Corporation (Upper Cape), against him for breach of an exclusive brokerage agreement. The judgment also dismissed Upper Cape’s additional claims against Morris and others for violation of G. L. c. 93A. We reverse the judgment for Morris on Upper Cape’s claim against him for

CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which KEITH, J., joined. KRUPANSKY, J. (pp. 862-869), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Sandra Morris, appeals from the district court’s judgment granting the motion for judgment as a matter of law in favor of Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., at the close of Plaintiffs case-in-chief in this neg

606 N.E.2d 1299 (1993) 239 Ill. App.3d 500 180 Ill.Dec. 222 Kenneth MORRIS and Joyce Morris, a Co-Partnership, d/b/a Pla-Mor Lanes, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-92-0540. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. January 21, 1993. Rehearing De