Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
14 opinions for “Moreno-Woods v. T-Mobile Wireless”
Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Simply Wireless, Inc.public domain
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FEDERICO A. MORENO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable William ■ C. Turnoff, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, filed on March 10, 2017. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and
In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Information of a Specified Wireless Telephonepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN K. GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge. The issue before the Court is the government’s authority to prospectively acquire precise location information derived from cellular and Global Positioning System (“GPS”) technology (collectively “location data”) to aid in the apprehension of the subject of an arrest warrant. The government has reported no attempts of the subject
United States v. Timothy Sanderspublic domain
KETHLEDGE, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which GUY, J., joined. STRANCH; J., joined the opinion in part and the result in part. STRANCH, J. (pp. 893-97), delivered a separate opinion joining in Parts II.B and III of the majority opinion and concurring in the judgment only with respect to Part II.A. OPINION KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge. In Fourth Amendment cases the Supreme Cour
Robinson v. Title Lenders, Inc.public domain
364 S.W.3d 505 (2012) Lavern ROBINSON, Respondent, v. TITLE LENDERS, INC., d/b/a Missouri Payday Loans, Appellant. No. SC 91728. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. March 6, 2012. *506 John Campbell, John Simon, Erich Vieth, The Simon Law Firm, St. Louis, MO, for Robinson. Claudia Callaway, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Wash
Kelly v. Statepublic domain
JAMES R. EYLER (Retired, specially assigned), J. This is an appeal by Wesley Torrance Kelly, appellant, from convictions in the Circuit Court for Howard County and the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. The cases were consolidated on appeal. In Anne Arundel County, the court convicted appellant of burglary in the second degree, committed on April 12, 2010, *
Afifi v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Yasir Afifi, brings suit against Loretta Lynch, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, James Comey, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (collectively, the “official capacity defendants”),
United States v. Caraballopublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE BASED ON THE GOVERNMENT’S WARRANT-LESS USE OF REALr-TIME CELL PHONE LOCATION INFORMATION (Doc. 38) CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge. This matter came before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Based on the Government’s Warrantless Use of Real-Time Cell Phone Location Information. (Doc. 38). Defendant contends that the gov
Opinion DUARTE, J. These two consolidated cases involve the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (the Act) (Health & Saf. Code, § 38500 et seq.; see Stats. 2006, ch. 488; § 1, p. 3419, enacting Assem. Bill No. 32 (2005-2006 Reg. Sess.), popularly known as “AB 32”).1 The Act was passed by a simple majority vote of
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
SWEPI, LP v. Mora Countypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on SWEPI’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings, filed May 31, 2014 (Doc. 21)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on November 3, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to determine issues of justiciability; (ii) whether Plaintiff
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS
In re Gen. Motors LLCpublic domain
[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276
Wolfe, Jennifer Bannerpublic domain
PD-0292-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/17/2015 4:35:05 PM Accepted 12/18/2015 8:08:53 AM