Cases

Concurring and dissenting opinion by MOON, C.J., in which LEVINSON, J., joins. I concur with the majority’s opinion, except I respectfully dissent from its decision to remand Condemnation 2 “for an express determination by the [trial] court of whether the asserted public purpose was pretextual.” Majority Opinion at 390, 198 P.3d at 653. I believe the Circ

94 F.Supp.2d 883 (2000) Laurie MORENO, Plaintiff, v. GRAND VICTORIA CASINO, Defendant. No. 98 C 336. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 3, 2000. *884 *885 *886 Dennis M. O'Bryan, Kirk E. Karamanian, O'Bryan, Baun & Cohe

OPINION CLIFTON, Circuit Judge: Sam K. is a disabled student. An administrative hearings officer for the State of Hawaii concluded that the State Department of Education (“DOE”) failed to propose a school placement for Sam for the 2010-11 school year that was appropriate and satisfied the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. The hea

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

970 F.Supp. 1094 (1997) Marilyn J. BARTLETT, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS; James T. Fuller, Individually and as Executive Secretary, New York State Board of Law Examiners; John E. Holt-Harris, Jr., Individually and as Chairman, New York State Board of Law Examiners; Richard J. Bartlett, Individually and as Member, New York State Board of Law Examiners, Laura Taylor Swain, Individually and as Member, New York State Board of

625 Argued and submitted March 12, 2020; decision of Court of Appeals reversed, judgment of circuit court affirmed March 4, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. JUSTIN ALAN LINK, Respondent on Review. (CC 01FE0371AB) (CA A163518) (SC S066824) 482 P3d 28 Defendant moved for an o

17 Cal.Rptr.3d 225 (2004) 95 P.3d 459 33 Cal.4th 1055 Bill LOCKYER, as Attorney General, etc., Petitioner, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents. Barbara Lewis et al., Petitioners, v. Nancy Alfaro, as County Clerk, etc., Respondent. Nos. S122923, S122865. Supreme Court of California. August 12, 2004.<

31 A.3d 1094 (2011) 303 Conn. 71 STATE of Connecticut v. Todd RIZZO. No. 17527. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued October 22, 2010. Decided November 29, 2011. *1102 Judith L. Borman and Ann M. Parrent, assistant public defenders, with whom, on the brief, was Jennifer L. Bourn, deputy as

315 S.W.3d 461 (2010) Marcus WARD v. STATE of Tennessee. No. W2007-01632-SC-R11-PC. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. November 5, 2009 Session. July 7, 2010. *463 Ryan B. Feeney, Selmer, Tennessee, for the appellant, Marcus Ward. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore,

760 N.W.2d 35 (2009) 277 Neb. 37 STATE of Nebraska, appellee, v. April ROGERS, appellant. No. S-07-085. Supreme Court of Nebraska. January 30, 2009. *42 Steven J. Lefler, of Lefler Law Office, Omaha, for appellant. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and George R. Love for appellee. HEAVICAN, C.J.

187 S.W.3d 503 (2005) Adrian D. LAGUNAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 03-03-00566-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. August 26, 2005. Rehearing Overruled October 14, 2005. Discretionary Review Refused May 3, 2006. *505 Anthony B. Cantrell, Suzanne M. Kramer, San Antonio, TX

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that “[n]o State shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1. It is settled law that alienage is a suspect class and that state laws that discriminate against aliens who are lawfully present in this country generally violate the Equal Protec

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that “[n]o State shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1. It is • settled law that alienage is a suspect class and that state laws that discriminate against aliens who are lawfully present in this country generally violate the Equal Pro

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1069 STEPHEN FOOTE, individually and as Guardian and next friend of B.F. and G.F., minors; MARISSA SILVESTRI, individually and as Guardian and next friend of B.F. and G.F., minors, Plaintiffs, Appellants, JONATHAN FELICIANO; SANDRA SALMERON, Plaintiffs, v. LUDLOW SCHOOL COMMITTEE; TODD GAZDA, forme

Appellate Case: 22-1445 Document: 187-1 Date Filed: 09/12/2024Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH September 12, 2024 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

ORDER GRANTING HFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT FUDDY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND HFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT ABERCROMBIE, AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT ABERCROMBIE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS SYNOPSIS..............................

ORDER HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT Since the issuance of the court’s earlier opinion on issues of jurisdiction, discovery has continued. The parties also were offered an opportunity to review and offer comments on the facts included in the court’s earlier opinion given their complexity. The revised facts, with a number of the parties’ recent suggestions incorporated, as well as a chro

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PACITO; ESTHER; JOSEPHINE; Nos. 25-1313, SARA; ALYAS; MARCOS; 25-1939 AHMED; RACHEL; ALI; HIAS, INC.; CHURCH WORLD SERVICE, D.C. No. INC.; LUTHERAN COMMUNITY 2:25-cv-00255- SERVICES NORTHWEST, JNW Plaintiff

137 P.3d 980 (2006) 111 Hawai`i 74 John YAMANE, as Special Administrator of the Estate of John Duong; Hung Duong, and Duc Lai, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Elizabeth C. POHLSON, M.D., Mitsuo Hattori, M.D., Mitsuo Hattori, M.D., Inc., and Kapi`Olani Medical Specialists, Defendants-Appellees, and Kapi`Olani Medical Center for Women and Children; John Does 1-10, Defendants. No. 27047. <

GREGORY, Chief Judge: I. A. *234*235*236*245