Cases

443 F.3d 646 Thomas MORAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Anne-Marie CLARKE; Robert Haar; Wayman F. Smith, III; Jeffery Jamison; Clarence Harmon, comprising the Board of Police Commissioners for the City of St. Louis; Ronald Henderson; Paul M. Nocchiero; Gregory Hawkins; Al Klein; Willie Thirdkill, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-2902. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

323 F.Supp.2d 974 (2004) Thomas MORAN, Plaintiff, v. Anne Marie CLARKE, et al. Defendants. No. 4:98-CV-556. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. July 6, 2004. *975 *976 *977 Stanley E. Goldstein, Liberman and Goldstein, Clayton, MO

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge Eric C. Deters is an attorney in Kentucky who has had a long’ and contentious relationship with the Kentucky Bar Association (KBA). At the time'his complaint was filed, he claimed that “at least 67 Bar Complaints” had been filed against him during his legal career and that he had “defeated” 61 of them. [R. 1 at -¶ 119.]

622 N.E.2d 157 (1993) John Edward MORAN, Appellant (Respondent below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Petitioner below). No. 71S04-9310-JV-1141. Supreme Court of Indiana. October 21, 1993. *158 Kenneth M. Hays, South Bend, for appellant. Pamela Carter, Atty. Gen., Geoff Davis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Thomas Moran, a St. Louis city police officer, sued various police department officials in their individual and official capacities alleging they violated his federal substantive due process rights and maliciously prosecuted him under state law. After a storied, lengthy, and racially-charged history, this case ended with the jury finding in favor of the defendants. Moran appeals, arguing the district cou

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

Justice Kennedy, with whom Justice Alito joins, dissenting. Eighteenth-century thinkers, even those most prescient, could not foresee our technological and economic interdependence. Yet they understood its foundation. Free trade in the United States, unobstructed by state and local barriers, was indispensable if we were to unite to ensure the liberty and progress o

946 S.W.2d 381 (1997) VINSON & ELKINS, Appellant, v. Ann MORAN and Jim Poinsett, Individually and as Assignees, and Patrick J. Moran, Appellees. No. 14-95-00348-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). March 27, 1997. Rehearing Overruled June 12, 1997, *386 David E. Keltner, Fort Worth, Richerd H.

509 U.S. 389 (1993) GODINEZ, WARDEN v. MORAN No. 92-725. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 21, 1993. Decided June 24, 1993. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *390 Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and White, O'Connor, and Souter

88 Md. App. 151 (1991) 594 A.2d 587 MARIA MORAN v. FOODMAKER, INC., T/A CHI CHI'S, A MARYLAND CORPORATION. No. 1001 September Term, 1990. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. August 28, 1991. Certiorari Denied December 10, 1991. Stephen A. Bou (Edward C. Bou, on the brief), Washington, D.C., for appellant. John J. O'N

Opinion by Judge THOMPSON; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON. DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: Richard Allan Moran pleaded guilty to three counts of capital murder and was sentenced to death by a Nevada state court. After exhausting his state court appeals, he filed a petition for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court den

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting, in which REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, joins: I dissent from the refusal to rehear this case en banc. The majority opinion is flawed in three very serious respects. I discussed two of these errors in my dissent from the panel’s decision in this case, Moran v. Godinez, 40 F.3d 1567, 1577-1586 (9th Cir.1994) (Pregerson, J., dissenting), and I will summarize those two is

OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Appellant James Harrison, a Kentucky state prisoner convicted of Murder With Aggravating Circumstances, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Harrison was represented by two attorneys at his criminal trial, and argues that he received ineffective ass

478 F.Supp. 145 (1979) Kenneth MORAN, Petitioner, v. Paul J. MORRIS, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 78-9753-RMT(S). United States District Court, C. D. California, Civil Division. July 25, 1979. As Amended September 5, 1979. *146 *147 Leslie H. Abramson, Beverly Hills, Cal., for p

954 F.Supp. 484 (1997) Thomas F. MORAN, Plaintiff, v. CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ADDITION SERVICES, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 3:96cv448 (PCD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 29, 1997. *485 *486 Michael D. Neubert, Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, New Ha

EDWARDS, Circuit Judge. On November 18, 1976, a panel of this court1 released an opinion reversing two perjury convictions of appellant Doss and remanding them to the District Court for dismissal of the perjury indictments, 545 F.2d 548. The panel opinion held that the facts in the case showed “an abuse of the grand jury process ... by the United Stat

[Cite as State v. Stitt, 2024-Ohio-3401.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113286 v. : BRADLEY W. STITT, :

Page 28 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL July 1, 2025 236 JULY, 2025 352 Conn. 236 State v. Haynes STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. VERNON HAYNES (SC 20794) Mullins, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy, Js.

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. Appellee Richard Cremeans was granted federal habeas corpus relief in April 1994. The district court granted relief on the ground that the length of delay from the time Cremeans pleaded guilty in October 1977 to the time an evidentiary hearing was held on the issue of Cremeans’ competency at the time he pleaded guilty denied Cremeans due process of l

[Cite as State v. Hsu, 2024-Ohio-2584.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113392 v. : CHIH-WEI HSU, : Defen