Cases

531 F.Supp.2d 845 (2008) Lee E. MOORE, Petitioner, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent. No. 1:00-CV-023. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. January 18, 2008. *846 *847 *848 *849

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ____________ No. 96-3094 ___________ Frederick Darnell Moore, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00372-CR Cameron Mitchell Moore, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-18-0166, THE HONORABLE WILLIAM R. HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00372-CR Cameron Mitchell Moore, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-18-0166, THE HONORABLE WILLIAM R. HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A

BATCHELDER, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which GIBBONS, J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pp. 778-79), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Lee Moore, convicted of kidnapping, robbing, and murdering Melvin Olinger, appeals the district court judgment that denied his motion for relief from judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

WALLER, CHIEF JUSTICE, DISSENTING: ¶ 87. Finality of judgments is one of the central pillars of our legal system. As we observed in William Iselin and Co., Inc. v. Delta Auction and Real Estate Co. , 433 So.2d 911 , 913 (Miss. 1983), this Court adheres to the "imp

707 F.2d 508 Moorev.Mitchell 82-6187 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 4/27/83 1 E.D.N.C. AFFIRMED

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00372-CR Cameron Mitchell Moore, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-18-0166, THE HONORABLE WILLIAM R. HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Cameron M

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 20, 2021 NO. 03-19-00372-CR Cameron Mitchell Moore, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee APPEAL FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH A

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00372-CR Cameron Mitchell Moore, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-18-0166, THE HONORABLE WILLIAM R. HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

607 F.2d 1002 Moorev.Mitchell No. 79-8316 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 10/24/79 1 W.D.Va. DISMISSED

*811MERRITT, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent from the court’s ruling on Petitioner Moore’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim arising from the testimony of Dr. Chiappone, discussed under the heading “Claim (2)(B)” of the majority opinion. The majority opinion asserts that this Court is faced with a “novel question stemming fro

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Frederick Darnell Moore appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court 2 for the District of Nebraska, following a bench trial, in favor of defendants Mitchell Novak and Craig Schmidt, in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. Moore v. Novak, No. 4:CV94-3328

786 So.2d 521 (2001) Marshall MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. Michael W. MOORE, Respondent. No. SC95299. Supreme Court of Florida. April 12, 2001. Rehearing Denied May 16, 2001. *523 Susan L. Kelsey of Holland & Knight LLP, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas

PER CURIAM. We dismiss without prejudice this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Brown v. Campion, 757 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). WOLF, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Brown v. Campion, 757 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). ALLEN, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus: ¶ 1 William Moore, III (Moore), appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County denying his post-trial motions and entering judgment on a jury verdict of $130,000.00 awarded to Appellee, Thomas Mitchell (Mitchell). We affirm in part and reverse in part. ¶ 2 Thomas Mitchell and William Moore first met in 1980; the two men quickly developed a

729 A.2d 1200 (1999) Thomas MITCHELL, Appellee, v. William MOORE, III, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 3, 1999. Filed April 12, 1999. *1202 Delores M. Troiani, Paoli, for appellant. John L. Lachall, West Chester, for appellee. Before MCEWEN, President Judge, and POPOVICH, J., and CIRILLO, Pre