⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Moore v. Miller”

Moore v. Millerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 349 F. App'x 815
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Terry J. Moore appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reaso
Moore v. Millerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 349 F. App'x 815
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Terry J. Moore appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reaso
Moore v. Millerpublic domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006-10-23 · Published · cited 10× · 910 A.2d 704; 2006 Pa. Super. 300; 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3532; 2006 WL 3001128
910 A.2d 704 (2006) George G. MOORE, Appellant, v. C. Kenneth MILLER and Bonnie Swinehart, All the Heirs at Law of Betty J. Miller, Deceased, Appellees. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued June 21, 2006. Filed October 23, 2006. George Moore, appellant, Pro Se. Christopher G. Hauser, Bradford, for Swinehart, appellee. BEFORE: BOWES, PANELLA and POPOV
Moore v. Millerpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002-10-31 · Published · cited 4× · 298 A.D.2d 776; 749 N.Y.S.2d 312; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10355
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting assaults on other inmates. The misbehavior report relates that an inmate was stabbed three times
Moore v. Millerpublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997-01-27 · Published · cited 5× · 675 N.E.2d 755; 1997 Ind. App. LEXIS 44; 1997 WL 27231
675 N.E.2d 755 (1997) Larry D. MOORE, Appellant-Respondent, v. Michelle A. (Moore) MILLER, Appellee-Petitioner. No. 48A02-9608-CV-518. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 27, 1997. *756 William Byer, Jr., Anderson, for Appellant-Respondent. OPINION FRIEDLANDER, Judge. Larry D. Moore appeals from th
Miller v. Moorepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017-11-15 · Published · cited 2× · 2017 Ark. App. 619; 535 S.W.3d 651; 2017 Ark. App. LEXIS 700
DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge 11 This is an adoption case. Brooke Ashley Miller is the biological mother of B.A.M., who was approximately four years old at the time of the adoption. Kerry Coleman is purportedly the child’s biological father. 1 The adoptive parents are Jason and Manesseh Moor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997-11-20 · Published · cited 4× · 244 A.D.2d 735; 664 N.Y.S.2d 388; 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11751
—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered February 26, 1997 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Eastern Correctional Facility in Ulster County for his 1985 conviction of the crime of sodomy in the first degree (People v Moore, 132 AD2d 776, lv denied 70 NY2d 802). In Sep
Moore v. Millerpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985-06-28 · Published · cited 1× · 612 F. Supp. 952; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18355
612 F.Supp. 952 (1985) Sharon MOORE and Jimmie Moore, Johnny Jefferson, individually on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey MILLER, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Aid, and the Illinois Department of Public Aid, Defendants. No. 81 C 7265. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. June 28, 1985.
Miller v. Moorepublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-12-27 · Published · cited 0× · 101 A.D.3d 1510; 957 N.Y.2d 484
Rose, J.P. *1511During the first jury trial, defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 4401 for a directed verdict. Supreme Court (Mulvey, J.) partially granted defendants’ motion from the bench by dismissing all but the second cause of action for restoration costs. The court reserved decision on the second cause of action pending submission of questions to the jury. The jur
Miller v. Moorepublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-12-27 · Published · cited 0× · 101 A.D.3d 1510; 957 N.Y.2d 484
Rose, J.P. *1511During the first jury trial, defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 4401 for a directed verdict. Supreme Court (Mulvey, J.) partially granted defendants’ motion from the bench by dismissing all but the second cause of action for restoration costs. The court reserved decision on the second cause of action pending submission of questions to the jury. The jur
Moore v. Millerpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983-12-06 · Published · cited 8× · 579 F. Supp. 1188; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11082
579 F.Supp. 1188 (1983) Sharon MOORE, Jimmie Moore, and Johnny Jefferson, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey MILLER, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Aid; and the Illinois Department of Public Aid, Defendants. No. 81 C 7265. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. December 6, 1983.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DAVID MILLER, as Co-Trustee of the Amendment and Complete Restatement of the Barbara R. Nurenberg Declaration of Trust, u/a/d October 9, 2018, Appellant, v. LEAH MARISSA MOORE, individually, as Co-Trustee of the Amendment and Complete Restatement of the Barbara R. Nurenberg Declaration
Miller v. Moorepublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009-12-10 · Published · cited 9× · 68 A.D.3d 1325; 890 N.Y.2d 712
Rose, J. After listing their lakefront property for sale with defendant Warren Real Estate, plaintiffs asked one of its agents, defendant Michael C. Moore, to find someone to clean up the property and improve the view of the lake. Moore arranged for the work to be done and later obtained plaintiffs’ permission to remove certain trees. Plaintiffs paid for the work, but when they discovered that many additional trees, bushes a
Moore v. Millerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979-06-11 · Published · cited 4× · 596 P.2d 64; 198 Colo. 24; 1979 Colo. LEXIS 673
596 P.2d 64 (1979) Charles Edward MOORE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arnold MILLER, Sheriff, Arapahoe County, Respondent-Appellee. No. 28168. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. June 11, 1979. Rehearing Denied July 2, 1979. J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, Craig L. Truman, Chief Deputy State Public Defender, Thomas M. Van Cleave,
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, August 09, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A2004. ERIC GALE MILLER v. CHARLES L. MOORE et al.. Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Moore v. Millerpublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 1974-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 90 Nev. 122; 520 P.2d 612; 1974 Nev. LEXIS 331
OPINION Per Curiam: Denied medical assistance under Nevada’s program for aid to the permanently and totally disabled (APTD), appellant petitioned the district court for review. See: NRS 428.270(2) (c). Again denied relief, appellant contends the court erred: (1) in determining that the aforesaid denial of assistance was supported by substantial evidence; (2) “in its [the court’s] support of the
Moore v. Moorepublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019-03-22 · Published · cited 118× · 302 Neb. 588; 924 N.W.2d 314
Freudenberg, J. *317 I. NATURE OF CASE The ex-husband appeals from the district court's order that he reimburse his ex-wife for half of certain "work related daycare expense[s]" for the parties' three children, as required by the dissolution decree, and as required by N
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 14, 2012 Assigned on Brief CAROLYN WHITESELL v. KAYLENE MILLER AND PATRICIA MOORE Appeal from the Circuit Court of Coffee County No. 36798 Vanessa A. Jackson, Judge No. M2011-02745-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 21
Miller v. Moorepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 533 U.S. 921; 121 S. Ct. 2532
C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Miller v. Moorepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 533 U.S. 921
C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.