Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 17, 2011 Session CONOLY BROWN, ET AL. v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 10C2390 Amanda Jane McClendon, Judge No. M2011-01194-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 21, 2013 The Metropolitan Council adopted a series of three ordinan

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Since its genesis, this litigation has sought to eradicate the effects of an official policy of racial segregation in the public schools of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and assure that each child enrolled in an Oklahoma City school enjoys the same right to a public education. We are now at a crossroad in the substantive and proce*1486dural life of

OSCN Found Document:Questions Submitted by: The Honorable Mark Mann, Oklahoma State Senate, District 46 Questions Submitted by: The Honorable Mark Mann, Oklahoma State Senate, District 462025 OK AG 11Decided: 08/27/2025OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINIONS Cite as: 2025 OK AG 11, __ __ ¶0 This office has received you

WALD, Circuit Judge: This case concerns the extent to which new coal-fired steam generators that produce electricity must control their emissions of sulfur dioxide and particulate matter into the air. In June of 1979 EPA revised the regulations called “new source performance standards” (“NSPS” or “standards”) governing emission con

794 F.Supp.2d 1238 (2011) David L. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. J.D. EPPLER, Ray Willard, Jane Doe, Janet Doe, Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority, Paul T. Boudreaux, and Richardson Richardson Boudreaux, Defendants. Case No. 09-CV-0466-CVE-TLW. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. June 8, 2011. *1241 Walter M. Benjamin, Tulsa, O

788 F.Supp.2d 1261 (2011) David L. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. J.D. EPPLER, Ray Willard, Jane Doe, Janet Doe, Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority, Paul T. Boudreaux, and Richardson Richardson Boudreaux, Defendants. Case No. 09-CV-0466-CVE-TLW. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. April 19, 2011. *1263 Walter M. Benjamin, Tulsa,

Appellate Case: 23-5110 Document: 248-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 6, 2025

19-1765-cv McKinney v. City of Middletown In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 19-1765-cv WILLIAM MCKINNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN, THOMAS SEBOLD, POLICE OFFICER, JOSHUA WARD, POLICE OFFICER, AND MICHAEL D’AREST

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge (Dissenting). “ ‘[Rjegardless of the heinousness of the crime charged, the apparent guilt of the offender[,] or. the station in life which he occupies,’ our system of justice demands trials that are fair in both appearance and fact.” Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. 358, 130 S.Ct. 2896, 177 L.Ed.2d 619 (2010) (Sotomayor, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (quoting

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Alter or Amend and to Reconsider Memorandum Opinion and Order [Doe. 252], filed September 15, 2016 (Doc. 255)(“Motion to Amend”); and (ii) the Plaintiffs’ Second Motion for Class Certification, filed September 15, 2016 (Doc. 256)(“Second Motion for Class Certifi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Rosann Schultz Berkemeier brings this action against her former employer, Defendant Standard Beverage Corporation (“SBC”), alleging discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and retaliatory discharge in violation of public policy under Kansas law. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summ

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification, filed January 13, 2014 (Doe. 116). The Court held a multi-part class certification heating, which took place on: (i) May 8 and 9, 2014; (ii) March 13 and 14, 2014; (iii) June 30, 2014; and (iv) July 14, 2014

73 S.W.3d 354 (2002) POWER RESOURCE GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS and Texas-New Mexico Power Company, Appellees. No. 03-01-00187-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. January 10, 2002. *356 Robert A. Webb, Austin, C.S. Lewis III, Gretchen M. Schilling, Riggs, Abney, Neal, Turpen, Orbison & Lew

955 P.2d 747 (1998) 1998 OK CIV APP 14 Robert E. THOMAS, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. The CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, a municipal corporation, et al., Defendants/Appellees. No. 87440. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3. January 30, 1998. Robert J. Unruh, Jr., Oklahoma City, for Plaintiffs/Appellants. William O. West, Mu

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Paula Forney, filed May 3, 2013 (Doc. 43)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on November 1, 2013. The primary issue is whether the Court should dismiss the Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant Paula Forney under rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Complaint in its Entirety, filed March 29, 2013 (Doc. 26)(“MTD & MSJ.”). The Court held a hearing on November 1, 2013. The primary issue is whether the Court will dismiss for failure to state a claim or gr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Plaintiffs Motion and Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment for Inhumane Conditions of Confinement, filed September 6, 2016 (Doc. 156)(“MSJ”); and (ii) the County Defendants’ Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 1 — Dismissal of Plaintiffs Substantive Due Process Cl

Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge This case is a highly contentious employment dispute. Plaintiff Curtis Klaassen, Ph.D., served as a tenured professor at the University of Kansas Medical Center ("KUMC") until KUMC fired him in 2014. Dr. Klaassen brings this lawsuit against KUMC and various current and former KUMC officials. He alleges that defendants retaliated against him because he criticized KUMC for financial mis