Cases

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

[Cite as Moore v. Moore, 2018-Ohio-1545.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Diane J. Moore Court of Appeals Nos. E-17-011 Appellee Trial Court Nos. 2015-DR-0064 v. Gerry L. Moore DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant Decid

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

07/24/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 13, 2025 Session DERRICK DARNELL MOORE AND DEMICHAEL TYRONE MOORE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2014-B-907 Steve R. Dozier,

03/24/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 4, 2025 JACQUET MOORE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 14-05951 Carlyn L. Addison, Judge ___________________________________

[Cite as Blackstone v. Moore, 2017-Ohio-8159.] STATE OF OHIO, MONROE COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT DAVID M. BLACKSTONE, et al. ) CASE NO. 14 MO 0001 ) PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES ) ) VS. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO REMEDY SAYLOR, J. This action arises out of a dispute concerning a closely held business that developed towers for the cellular telephone industry. The principal dispute involves a seríes of transactions in which the majority owners of the business froze out the minority owners and appropriated assets and business opportunities for their own bene

[Cite as Moore v. Sandusky Bldg. Code Bd. of Appeals, 2024-Ohio-1799.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Shameka L. Moore, Trustee Court of Appeals No. E-23-042 Appellant Trial Court No. 2022 CV 0116 v. City of Sandusky Building DECISION AND JUDG

[Cite as Moore v. Moore, 2025-Ohio-88.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MONROE COUNTY ERIC D. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KAYLA R. MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

07/26/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 5, 2018 DONALD K. MOORE, JR. v. GRADY PERRY, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County No. CC-17-CR-165 Joe H. Walker, III, Judge ___________________________

[Cite as Moore v. Moore, 2021-Ohio-4010.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ANDREA MOORE, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 109999 v. : GREGORY MOORE, : D

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/03/2019 09:08 AM CDT - 588 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 302 Nebraska R eports MOORE v. MOORE Cite as 302 Neb. 588 Lucinda D. Moore, ap

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/14/2019 09:08 AM CDT - 588 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 302 Nebraska R eports MOORE v. MOORE Cite as 302 Neb. 588 Lucinda D. Moore, ap

Freudenberg, J. *317 I. NATURE OF CASE The ex-husband appeals from the district court's order that he reimburse his ex-wife for half of certain "work related daycare expense[s]" for the parties' three children, as required by the dissolution decree, and as required by N

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 453 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-22-714 MARY CORINNE SMART-MOORE Opinion Delivered September 25, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, V.

Atcheson, J.: *612 SUMMARY OF CASE AND DISPOSITION The central issue in this case turns on whether Steven Moore manipulated John and Joyce Moore, his parents, to part with land they owned, thereby gutting a trust they had set up as an estate plan to benefit all four of

[Cite as State v. Moore, 2025-Ohio-4502.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 25AP0001 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE CHRISTOPHER G. MOORE

[Cite as Solon v. Moore, 2025-Ohio-2446.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CITY OF SOLON, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 114160 v. : DAWN M. MOORE, :

People v Moore (2025 NY Slip Op 05169) People v Moore 2025 NY Slip Op 05169 Decided on September 25, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorre

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 52108 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) Boise, June 2025 Term v. ) )