Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Moore v. Central Carolina Surgical Eye Associates, P.A.”
Old Battleground Props., Inc. v. Cent. Carolina Surgical Eye Assocs., P.A., 2015 NCBC 18. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 15 CVS 1648 OLD BATTLEGROUND PROPERTIES, INC. and NIVISON FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S
In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Old Battleground v. Ccsea)public domain
In re Se. Eye Ctr. (Old Battleground v. CCSEA), 2019 NCBC 28. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 15 CVS 1648 IN RE SOUTHEASTERN EYE ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTIONS CENTER-PENDING MATTERS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (OLD BATTLEGROUND V. CCSEA) 1. THIS MATTER is befor
Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. Schmidtpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,153 HODES & NAUSER, MDS, P.A.; HERBERT C. HODES, M.D.; and TRACI LYNN NAUSER, M.D., Appellees, v. DEREK SCHMIDT, in His Official Capacity
Hodes & Nauser, MDs, P.A. v. Schmidtpublic domain
No. 114,153 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS HODES & NAUSER, MDS, P.A.; HERBERT C. HODES, M.D.; and TRACI LYNN NAUSER, M.D., Appellees, v. DEREK SCHMIDT,
In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Pending Matters), 2021 Ncbc 27apublic domain
In re Se. Eye Ctr. (Pending Matters), 2021 NCBC 27A. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 15 CVS 1648 IN RE SOUTHEASTERN EYE AMENDED ORDER AND OPINION CENTER-PENDING MATTERS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1095 Doc: 49 Filed: 03/28/2024 Pg: 1 of 97 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1095 RODNEY D. PIERCE; MOSES MATTHEWS, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BO
Spears v. Betsy Johnson Memorial Hospitalpublic domain
*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Harris and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties. The Full Commission affirms with minor modifications the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Harris and enters the following Opini
Webb v. Nash General Hospitalpublic domain
*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence affirms in part, and reverses in part the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as fa
Precision Fabrics Grp., Inc. v. Tietex Int'l, Ltd.public domain
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. These patent infringement actions are before the court on several pretrial motions filed by the parties. Precision Fabrics *552Group, Inc. ("PFG") alleges that Tietex International, Ltd. ("Tietex") infringed its U.S. Patents Nos. 8,796,162 ('162 Patent) and 8,501,639 ('639 Patent) for flame-retardant techno
NC NAACP State Conference v. Ken Raymondpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1092 NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP; CHAPEL HILL- CARRBORO NAACP; GREENSBORO NAACP; HIGH POINT NAACP; MOORE COUNTY NAACP; STOKES COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP; WINSTON SALEM – FORSYTH COUNTY NAACP, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. KEN
320 B.R. 312 (2005) In re DUCANE GAS GRILLS, INC., Debtor. Newman Grill Systems, LLC, Marc Newman, and Amy Newman, Plaintiffs, v. Ducane Gas Grills, Inc., Weber-Stephen Products, Co., Ira Zolin, and Ducane Products Co., Defendants. C/A No. 04-15219-W. Adversary No. 04-80160-W. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina. October 7, 2004.
Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesenpublic domain
181 S.W.3d 292 (2005) Abu-Ali ABDUR'RAHMAN v. Phil BREDESEN, et al. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. June 8, 2005 Session. October 17, 2005. *297 Bradley A. MacLean and Cynthia W. MacLean, Nashville, Tennessee, and William P. Redick, Jr., Whites Creek, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Abu-Ali Abdur'Rahman. Paul G. Su
Propst v. HWS Co.public domain
ORDER Richard L. Voorhees, United States District Judge THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16), Plaintiffs Motion to Strike the Declaration of William Smith (Doc. No. 17), and Plaintiffs Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jimmie Link (Doc. No. 18). Because the parties’ submissions are filed and pending, they are now each ripe for this Court’s review.
Rivera v. Schwabpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,092 FAITH RIVERA et al., TOM ALONZO et al., and SUSAN FRICK et al., Appellees, v. SCOTT SCHWAB, Kansas Secretary of State, in His Official Capacity, and MICHAEL ABBOTT, Wyandotte County Election Commissioner, in His Official Capacity,
Case: 16-60118 Document: 00513595283 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/15/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 15, 2016 No. 16-60118
Promise Arizona v. Petersenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MI FAMILIA VOTA; VOTO No. 24-3188 LATINO; LIVING UNITED FOR D.C. No. CHANGE IN ARIZONA; LEAGUE 2:22-cv-00509- OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN SRB CITIZENS ARIZONA; ARIZONA STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION; ADRC ACTION; INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA, INC.; OPINION SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE; ARIZONA COALITION FOR
Rivera v. Schwabpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,092 FAITH RIVERA et al., TOM ALONZO et al., and SUSAN FRICK et al., Appellees, v. SCOTT SCHWAB, Kansas Secretary of State, in His Official Capacity, and MICHAEL ABBOTT, Wyandotte County Election Commissioner, in His Official Capacity,
Perez v. Koreskopublic domain
MEMORANDUM McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Procedural History. .300 A. Administrative Enforcement Proceedings.300 B. Initial Complaint .301 C. Motion for Summary Judgment. 302 D. Supplemental Complaint.303 E. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injuncti
Coward v. Robinsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Leonie M, Brinkema, United States District Judge Plaintiff Kalvin Donnell Coward (“Coward” or “plaintiff’), an inmate of the Virginia Department of Corrections, alleges *550that the defendants, A; David Robinson, Chief of Corrections Operations, and Harold W. Clarke, Director, in their capacities as employees of the Department (t
Shauntae Anderson v. William Crouchpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1927 Doc: 119 Filed: 04/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 147 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1721 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM