Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge. The plaintiff, Nellie Moore, seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner (“Commissioner”) of the Social Security Administration (“Agency”) denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2). Ms. Mueller asks the court to reverse an

623 F.3d 599 (2010) Sebastian MOORE, Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Appellee. No. 10-1126. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 23, 2010. Filed: October 20, 2010. *600 E. Gregory Wallace, argued, Raleigh, NC, Anthony W. Bartels, on the brief, Jone

572 F.3d 520 (2009) Belinda MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-3546. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 10, 2009. Filed: July 14, 2009. *521 Eugene Gregory Wallace, argued, Buies Creek, NC, Anthony

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT __________ No. 08-3546 __________ Belinda Moore, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court f

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. Plaintiff seeks review of a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (hereinafter Commissioner) denying disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI) under sections 216®, 223, 1602, and 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416®, 423, 1381a, and 1382c(a)(3)(A) (hereinafter the Act). Finding erro

AMENDED OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Richard L. Cole suffered a work-related back injury, subsequently developed depression then sought disability. The Commissioner of Social Security adjudged him not to be disabled for purposes of social security disability benefits. Cole appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner’s decision. We reverse and remand. I.

652 F.3d 653 (2011) Richard COLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-4309. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 8, 2010. Decided and Filed: July 15, 2011. Rehearing Granted September 21, 2011. *655 ARGUED:

633 F.3d 633 (2011) David PETERSEN, Appellee, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Appellant. No. 09-2374. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 11, 2010. Filed: February 3, 2011. *634 Sydney Foster, DOJ, AAG, argued, Thomas Mark Bondy, DOJ, AAG, on the brief, Washingt

773 F.Supp.2d 984 (2011) Judith L. WULF, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No. 09-1348-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 26, 2011. *985 Kyle Jay Saunders, Saunders & Saunders, Ada, OK, for Plaintiff. Robin Barkett Moore, Office of United States Attorne

573 F.3d 263 (2009) Terry HENSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-6389. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Submitted: June 16, 2009. Decided and Filed: July 21, 2009[*]. *264 ON BRIEF: Julie Anne Atkins, Atkins Law Offi

536 F.3d 651 (2008) Hans EVERS, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-3796. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued May 9, 2008. Decided July 31, 2008. *653 Martin B. Lowery (argued), Naperville, IL, for Plaintiff-App

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the *270Pleadings [Doc. 11] and the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 13]. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On October 2, 2007, the Plaintiff applied for disability

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER SCULLIN, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Randy J. Pidkaminy brought this action pursuant to the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). See Dkt. No. 1.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, District Judge. Currently before the Court, in this action by Craig Petersen (“Plaintiff’) against Social Security Commissioner Michael J. Astrue (“Defendant”) seeking Social Security benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), is the Report-Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini, issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff Judy Lynn Culver (“Ms. Culver”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006), Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act. She seeks review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), who denied her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Suppl

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff David Earl Watkins (“Mr. Watkins”) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006), Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act. He seeks review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), who denied his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”)

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CANDY W. DALE, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION Arthur Eckermann (“Petitioner”) seeks review of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s final decision partially denying Petitioner’s application for Supplemental Security Income disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. (Dkt. 1.) The Court has revi

*1058 ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Thomas C. Mummert, filed January 23, 2013 (ECF No. 25). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Mummert. Magistrate Judge Mummert recommends that the Court affirm

MEMORANDUM OPINION NANCY K. JOHNSON, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the court1 are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 9) and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17). The court has considered the motions, all relevant filings, and the applicable law. For the reasons set forth below, the court GRANTS Defendant’s motion and DENIES Pl

ORDER SONJA F. BIVINS, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Eula W. Rivers (“Plaintiff’) brings this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq., and