Cases

ZIMMERMAN, Justice: Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated (“Wal-Mart”) appeals from a district court ruling denying its motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Desiree Hall (“Hall”) sued Wal-Mart after she was struck by a vehicle driven by Larry Moss in an icy parking lot at Wal-Mart’s Cedar City store. A jury found that Wal-Mart was negligent in failing to safely maintain the parking lot, and that Wal-Mart’s liability for

872 P.2d 859 (1994) 117 N.M. 441 Susan GANDY and Carl Gandy, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 21035. Supreme Court of New Mexico. March 31, 1994. Cherpelis & Salazar, P.A., Timothy L. Salazar, Jeffrey S. Landers, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant. Kenneth R. Wagner & Associates, P.A.,

ROMERO, Bankruptcy Judge. We address the appeals of Pedro Mendoza and Sandy Armijo and Steven and Darla Sue Dollman together as both appeals raise an identical legal issue: whether the New Mexico bankruptcy courts properly sustained a Chapter 7 trustee's objections to the amendment of the debtors' bankruptcy schedules. In both cases, the bankruptcy courts concluded the general right to amend schedules provided by

68 Cal.Rptr.3d 91 (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 1448 JPI WESTCOAST CONSTRUCTION, L.P., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RJS & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant and Respondent; Great American Insurance Company, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent; Transcontinental Insurance Company, Cross-defendant and Appellant. No. A114692. Court of Appeal of California, First District, Divis

FILED U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit PUBLISH February 5, 2019 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE INTRODUCTION “Plaintiff is a professional class-action plaintiff who regularly works with [Law Firm of] Anderson & Wanca to file TCPA cases.” Physicians Healthsource, Inc. v. Doctor Diabetic Supply, LLC, 2014 WL 7366255, at *7 (S.D. Fla. 2014).1 The plaintiff has

ACCEPTED 03-16-00510-CV 13915805 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

FLOYD, Circuit Judge: *253The Constitution entrusts the President and Congress, not the courts, with the power to resolve political questions. See Japan Whaling Ass'n v. Am. Cetacean Soc'y , 478 U.S. 221, 230, <

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT

ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In 2009, Plaintiffs Blair and Davis, on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, filed suit alleging that Defendant TransAm Trucking, Inc. ("TransAm") violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and the Kansas Wage Payment Act ("KWPA"). Plaintiffs bring this action as a collective action under the FLSA for minimum wage violations, and as a Rule 23 class action fo

ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE, United States Magistrate Judge Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to compel or for modification of the August 18 Order, which they filed on an emergency basis. Docket No. 362. Defendants filed a response in opposition, and Plaintiffs filed a reply. Docket Nos. 373, 377. The motion came , on for hearing on October 15, 2015. Docket No. 383.1 For

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00204-CV Sheffield Development Company, § From the 153rd District Court Inc. § of Tarrant County (153-252953-11) v. § February 1, 2013 Carter & Burgess, Inc. § Opinion by Chief Just

02-11-204-CV

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ROBERT J. SHELBY, United States District Judge This is a putative class action brought against two affiliated trucking companies by drivers once associated with those companies. Plaintiffs Charles Roberts and Kenneth McKay allege that Defendants C.R. England, Inc. and Opportunity Leasing, Inc. developed a fraudulent plan to induce thousands of people to enroll in England’s dr

OPINION & ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: The plaintiff and class representative Max-cimo Scott filed a nationwide class and collective action complaint on November 15, 2012, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. (“FLSA” *39or the “Act”), and the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law,

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. Plaintiffs bring this collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the Maryland Wage and Hour Law (“MWHL”), alleging that they worked in excess of forty hours per week as traffic controllers for Defendant Power-Comm Construction, Inc. (“PowerComm”) but were not paid sufficient overtime wages. Defendants have moved for summary

MEMORANDUM & ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. Plaintiff Pauline Yu brought this action against Defendant Diversified Collection Services, Inc. (“DCS”) in 2010, alleging that Defendant’s communications with her in connection with attempts to collect a debt violated various provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Procedures Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (“FDCPA”). Presently before th

OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, removed from the 112th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a),1 1441, and 1446, and *532seeking damages

Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. The suit giving rise to the case before the Court was filed by a plaintiff who was a member of a putative class in a class action but who later elected to withdraw and proceed in this separate suit, seeking recovery for the same illegalities that were alleged in the class suit. The class-action suit had been filed within the time perm

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV