Cases

NO. 12-22-00014-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DRASHAYDRIAN MONTELL § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH HUNTER, APPELLANT § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This matter is pending for consideration of Defendants Diversified Clinical Services, Ine.’s (“DCS”), and Austin Day’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Sanctions. [Record Nos. 36, 43] The defendants contend that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [Record No. 36] Addi

OPINION CLELAND, District Judge. Before the Court is another in the growing line of cases challenging whether a sentence was reasonable under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We very recently rejected a remarkably similar sentencing challenge brought by the same Federal De

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 28, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL MONTELL WILLIAMS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 260622 Rebecca J. Stern, Judge No. E2010-02402-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 28, 2011 The Defendant, Michael Montell Williams, was indicted b

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-KA-01015-SCT KENDRICK SCOTT a/k/a KENDRICK MONTRELL SCOTT a/k/a KENDRICK MONTELL SCOTT a/k/a E.T. v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/09/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES McCLURE, III TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: CORY MICHAEL WILLIAMSON STEVEN PATRICK JUBERA COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

OPINION STARING, Judge: ¶ 1 Jeffrey Gullett appeals the judgment compelling arbitration of his statutory claim for abuse and neglect of his late father Win-ford Gullett pursuant to Arizona’s Adult Protective Services Act (APSA), AR.S. §§ 46-451 to 46-459. He argues the arbitration agreement is substantively unconscionable and, alternatively, the trial court erred in failing to allow discovery and grant an

944 F.Supp. 1119 (1996) UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Individually and on Behalf of and as the Successor in Interest of Seadrift Polypropylene Company, Plaintiff, v. MONTELL N.V.; Montell Polyolefins; Montell North America Inc.; Montell USA Inc.; Technipol S.r.L.; Montedison S.p.A.; Montell Finance USA, Inc.; Royal Dutch Petroleum Company; The Shell Transport and Trading Company, p.l.c.; Shell Petroleum N.V.; The Shell Petroleum Company Ltd.; Shell

77 Wn. App. 934 (1995) 894 P.2d 1366 JAMIE JOHNSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent No. 34783-7-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. May 22, 1995. As amended by order June 20, 1995. Zenon Olbert and Montell Hester, for appellant. Christine O. Gregoire, Attorney General

940 F.Supp. 697 (1996) Slaydon HAWES et al. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al. Civil Action No. 94-5332 (NHP). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. October 15, 1996. *698 *699 Carol H. Alling, Selikoff & Cohen, P.A., Mount Laurel, NJ, for plaintiffs. Francis X. Dee, Carpenter,

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5388-16T3 MILAGROS ROMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION v. September 24, 2018 BERGEN LOGISTICS, LLC and

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1576-17T3 DAVID F. CALABOTTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION June 27, 2019 v. APPELLATE DIVISION PHIBRO ANIMAL HEALTH

WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Nicholas Montel ("Montel") brought the instant suit against the City of Springfield ("Springfield") and three Springfield police officers, William Catellier, Luke Cournoyer, and Juan Rodriguez (the "Officers"), alleging violations of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and various torts. See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. These

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION May 13, 2025 Plaintiff-Appellee,

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. | PThe issue in this inverse condemnation case concerns the amount of compensation due landowners as a result of the taking of their land by the New Orleans Aviation Board. In this appeal, PlaintiffsAandown-ers challenge the trial court’s judgment finding the amount of just compensation owed by Defendant, New Orleans Aviation Board, for taking the subject property to be $30,740.00. For the reasons tha

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Valeria Nunez Cruz brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. The Commissioner moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant

Reversed and vacated by published opinion. Judge HARRIS wrote the opinion, in which Senior Judge DAVIS joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a dissenting opinion. HARRIS, Circuit Judge: On an afternoon in 2014, the Ranson, West Virginia police department received an anonymous tip that a black man had loaded a gun in a 7-Eleven parking lot and then concealed it in his pocket before leaving in a car. A few minutes l

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, Chief Judge. Montel Aetnastak, Inc. (“MAI”) and Montel Inc. (“Montel”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Kristine Miessen a/k/a Kristine N. Schneider (“Miessen”), Bradford Systems Corporation (“Bradford”), and SpaceSaver Corporation (“SpaceSaver”) (collectively “Defendants”) alleging: (1) breach of the non-compete provision in Mei

WYNN, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: Defendant Shaquille Robinson concedes that law enforcement officers reasonably suspected that he was carrying a firearm.1 Defendant further concedes that the law enforcement officers lawfully stopped him for an unrelated, albeit pretextual, reason. I agree with the majority that these facts alone allowed the officers to perform a p

82 F.Supp.2d 702 (2000) Linda Marie MINEER, etc., Plaintiff, v. Montel WILLIAMS, et al, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 99-187. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, at Covington. February 3, 2000. *703 Eric C. Deters, Fort Mitchell, KY, for plaintiff. Deborah H. Patterson, William H. Hollander, Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, L

DONOHUE, SR., Presiding Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 10, 2009) THIS MATTER is before the Court on a Petition for Writ of Review and a Motion for Rule 15(d) Relief filed on December 10, 2008 and a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order filed on December 22,2008 by Petitioner, Wilbert Williams, M.D. Respondent, Government of the Virgin Islands (hereinafter “Government”), has filed O