Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Monte's Repair Service, Inc.”
Filed 11/8/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT DEDICATION AND B318078 EVERLASTING LOVE TO ANIMALS, INC., Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STLC05477 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF EL MONTE, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a
PRETRIAL ORDER # 100 (.Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Finding of Spoliation and for Sanctions) CHERYL A. EIFERT, United States Magistrate Judge. Currently pending in this multidistrict litigation is Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Finding of Spoliation and for Sanctions. (ECF No. 952). Plaintiffs claim that after a duty to preserve evidence had been triggered, defendant Ethicon, Inc. (“Ethicon
Monte Montgomery v. Monty Hitchcockpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00643-CV 3641064 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Hills v. United Parcel Service, Inc.public domain
NEHRING, Justice: INTRODUCTION ¶ 1 In this appeal we consider for the first time whether Utah should recognize a cause of action for third-party spoliation of evidence. Bruce and Judith Hills sued United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. for destroying evidence related to the death of their son, Mark Hills. Mark Hills’ death is the subject of a wrongful-death suit again
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SURGICAL INSTRUMENT No. 25-1372 SERVICE COMPANY, INC., D.C. No. 3:21-cv-03496- Plaintiff-ctr-defendant - AMO Appellant, v. OPINION INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.,
Dreben, J. Foreign Car Center, Inc. (Foreign Car), a corporation engaged in the selling, leasing and repairing of motor vehicles, was in difficult financial circumstances in the early 1990’s. Its president and treasurer, Stefano Picciotto (Picciotto), was sick due to toxic fumes from a neighboring factory and could only work a few hours at a time. His wife, Judith Picciotto (Judith), the sole stockholder of Foreign Car, testifie
Spooner Construction & Tree Service, Inc. v. Manerpublic domain
66 P.3d 263 (2003) 2003 MT 43 SPOONER CONSTRUCTION & TREE SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Ernie MANER d/b/a Northwest Soft Tracks, Defendant and Respondent. No. 01-574. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs July 18, 2002. Decided March 11, 2003. *264 Martin J. Elison
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 41. {dissenting). I agree with the majority that the four-corners rule includes consideration of exclusions as well as exceptions to those exclusions in an insurance policy. I write separately because I disagree with the majority's conclusion to foreclose a narrow exception to the four-corners rule. Majority op., ¶ 24. ¶ 42. The majority's decision today is at loggerheads with th
Mobile Electronic Service, Inc. v. FirsTel, Inc.public domain
649 N.W.2d 603 (2002) 2002 SD 87 MOBILE ELECTRONIC SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FIRSTEL, INC., Defendant and Appellant. No. 21818. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs on October 1, 2001. Reassigned March 19, 2002. Decided July 24, 2002. *604 St
Edwards v. Niles Sales & Service, Inc.public domain
439 F.Supp.2d 1202 (2006) Leroy R. EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. NILES SALES & SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation for profit, and Jack Niles, individually Defendants. No. 05-10027-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. June 27, 2006. *1203 *1204 William O. Solms, Esq., Demahy Labrador
164 S.W.3d 751 (2005) ETHIO EXPRESS SHUTTLE SERVICE, INC. d/b/a Texans Super Shuttle, Appellant, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellee. No. 14-04-00937-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). May 12, 2005. Rehearing Overruled June 9, 2005. *753 Richard N. Countiss, Houston, for appellants. Bertrand L.
Spooner Construction & Tree Service, Inc. v. Manerpublic domain
JUSTICE REGNIER delivered the opinion of the Court. ¶1 Spooner Construction & Tree Service, Inc., (Spooner) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Ernie Maner, d/b/a Northwest Soft Tracks, (Maner) by the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. <
JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Appellants Northwestern Corporation, doing business as Northwestern Energy (Northwestern), the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and Human Resources Council, District XI (HRC), appeal the decision of the Second Judicial District Court affirming the Final Order of the Montana-Public Service Commission (Commission), which disallowed $1,419,427 in claimed e
Silver v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) MONTE SILVER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 19-cv-247 (APM)
Vision Net, Inc. v. Statepublic domain
Justice Jim Rice delivered the Opinion of the Court. ***120¶1 Vision Net, Inc., (Vision Net) appeals the order entered by the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, denying its motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to the Montana Department of Revenue (DOR or Department). The District Court held the Departmen
Jim's Excavating Service, Inc. v. HKM Associatespublic domain
JUSTICE NELSON delivered the Opinion of the Court. Jim’s Excavating Service, Inc. (JES), brought this action against the engineering firm of HKM Associates, (HKM), in the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, claiming delay and extra work damages as a result of HKM’s negligent design and supervision of the Lockwood Water User’s A
Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. Montespublic domain
Borden, J. The defendants Luis A. Montes and Dalila Montes1 (defendants) appeal2 from the judgment of strict foreclosure by the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc., on the plaintiffs complaint, and from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff on the defendants’ counterclaims. The defendants claim that the trial court’s de
JUSTICE McKINNON, dissenting. ¶30 The Court states that Buckles’ Complaint was dismissed by the District Court “without any substantive analysis,” Opinion, ¶ 24, and in a “single paragraph setting forth the procedural history of the case ... concluded that the motion was being granted ‘[flor the reasons argued by Continental.’ ” Opinion, ¶ 8. The Court does not con
Fox v. BHCC II, Inc.public domain
JUSTICE WHEAT delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Herman Fox filed a complaint against the Billings Hotel & Convention Center (BHCC or Hotel) in December 2015 alleging that BHCC was interfering with his right to distribute irrigation water and maintain the irrigation ditch to which he holds senior rights. F
JAS, Inc. v. Eiselepublic domain
JUSTICE SHEA delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Plaintiff JAS, Inc. appeals the order of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and voided the Trustee’s Sale at which JAS purchased the property at issue. After the Trustee’s Sale, JAS brought a quiet title action to the property aga