Cases

MEMORANDUM *** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of a motion to reopen its decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of cancellation of removal. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status. Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because

MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Board of Immigration Appeals did not err in summarily dismissing petitioner’s appeal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GERARDO VAZQUEZ, GLORIA No. 17-16096 ROMAN, and JUAN AGUILAR, on behalf of themselves and all other D.C. No. similarly situated, 3:16-cv-05961- Plaintiffs-Appellants, WHA v. OPINION JAN-PRO FRANCHISING INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

FARRIS, Circuit Judge: Appellants Maria Duran and Lilia Vazquez appeal from their convictions and sentences. At a jury trial, Maria Duran was convicted of conspiracy to obstruct justice and commit perjury, two counts of aiding and abetting *543 perjury, filing a false tax return, two counts of struc

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GERARDO VAZQUEZ, GLORIA No. 17-16096 ROMAN, and JUAN AGUILAR, on behalf of themselves and all other D.C. No. similarly situated, 3:16-cv-05961- Plaintiffs-Appellants, WHA v. OPINION JAN-PRO FRANCHISING INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Filed 7/9/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT PICO NEIGHBORHOOD B295935 ASSOCIATION et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. BC616804) v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superi

Filed 8/5/20 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT PICO NEIGHBORHOOD B295935 ASSOCIATION et al., (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC616804) Plaintiffs and Respondents, ORDER MODIFYI

WETHERELL, J. The Santa Monica Beach Property Owners Association and the members of its board of directors (collectively “the Association”) appeal the order dismissing the declaratory judgment action in which they alleged that the use of Appellees’ properties as short-term vacation rentals violates the covenants restricting the properties’ use to residential purposes only and prohibiting their use for business purposes. We a

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GERARDO VAZQUEZ, GLORIA No. 17-16096 ROMAN, and JUAN AGUILAR, on behalf of themselves and all other D.C. No. similarly situated, 3:16-cv-05961- Plaintiffs-Appellants, WHA v. ORDER AND JAN-PRO FRANCHISING AMENDED INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GERARDO VAZQUEZ, GLORIA No. 17-16096 ROMAN, and JUAN AGUILAR, on behalf of themselves and all other D.C. No. similarly situated, 3:16-cv-05961- Plaintiffs-Appellants, WHA v. OPINION JAN-PRO FRANCHISING INT

Opinion issued November 2, 2006 In The Court of Appeals<

Monica Towne v. SSA 11-CV-434-SM 9/25/12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Monica Towne, Claimant v. Case No. ll-cv-434-SM Opinion No. 2012 DNH 161 Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Claimant, Monica

OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant Carlos Laboy’s (“Laboy”) Motion to Dismiss. (Docket No. 22). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Laboy’s Motion. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On October 1, 2007, the Municipality of Barceloneta acquired the right to operate and manage its public housing communi

OPINION AND ORDER PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs, Jaime Feliciano-Caceres (d/b/a JF & Assoc.), Ingrid Candanedo-Zamora, and the Conjugal Partnership of Feliciano-Candanedo (collectively referred to as “plaintiffs”) filed this copyright infringement claim on November 20, 2002. The named defendants are Land-Fill Technologies Corp., d/b/a Landfill Technologies Corp.; F & S Co

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered September 19, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants’ answers to the extent of precluding defendant 1211 Wheeler LLC (Wheeler) from introducing evidence that it lacked notice of a hazardous lead paint condition, and denied Wheeler’s motion to compel plaintiffs to produce authorizations for the medical and educational

*1321 BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. The Secretary of Labor brought suit under the Pair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., against a corporation and its owners (“the defendants”) to enjoin and redress violations of the statute. After a trial, the dis

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered September 19, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants’ answers to the extent of precluding defendant 1211 Wheeler LLC (Wheeler) from introducing evidence that it lacked notice of a hazardous lead paint condition, and denied Wheeler’s motion to compel plaintiffs to produce authorizations for the medical and educational

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. For nearly three years, appellant Saul Ruelas-Valdovinos supplied most of the cocaine that his 22 co-conspirators sold in southern Illinois and Missouri. He pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine. When the district court calculated the sentencing guideline range, it applied a three-level upward adjustment for Ruelas-Valdovinos’s role as a sup

150 F.Supp.2d 1182 (2001) Teresita J. DUMAIS, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION d/b/a Paradise Hills Golf Club, and William Winkler, Defendants. No. CIV 00-0255MV/LCS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. June 14, 2001. *1184 *1185 Christopher M. Moody, Whitney Warner, Noeding &a;

102 F.Supp.2d 1265 (2000) Sandra LEE, Plaintiff, v. NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 97-944 MV/LCS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. July 11, 2000. *1266 *1267 Chris S. Key, Albuquerque, NM, for Sandra Lee, plaintiff. Raul A. Carrill