Cases

*1132ORDER PER CURIAM. In light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Grisham v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 40 Cal.4th 623, 54 Cal.Rptr.3d 735, 151 P.3d 1151 (2007), and in light of the Joint Report of the Parties Re: Decision of the California Supreme Court on the Certified Questions, the judgments of the district court are VACATED

482 F.3d 1131 Leslie J. GRISHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A., a corporation; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp., individually and as successor to the American Tobacco Company and its predecessor in interest, British American Tobacco Industries, PLC, Defendants-Appellees.Maria Cannata, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Philip Morris USA, Inc., aka Philip Morris; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Defendants-

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LESLIE J. GRISHAM,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A., a corporation; BROWN & WILLIAMSON No. 03-55780 TOBACCO COMPANY CORP.,  D.C. No. individually and as successor to CV-02-07930-SVW the American Tobacco Company and its predecessor in interest, British American Tobacco Industries, PLC,

OPINION ZAMORA, Judge. The central issues presented in this case are: (1) whether this Court can consider the State’s new argument against suppression of the alleged victim’s testimony in light of the procedural posture of the case, and (2) if so, did the district court err in denying the State’s motion for reconsideratio

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 20:08:13 2015.02.25 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

151 F.Supp.2d 788 (2000) Monica C. BUENROSTRO, Plaintiff, v. FLIGHT SAFETY INTERNATIONAL, INC. and Flight Safety Texas, Inc., Defendants. No. Civ.A. SA-99-CA-819FB. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. June 21, 2000. *789 Gerald Thomas Drought, Denise Nixon Bunk, Martin, Drought & Torres, San Antoni

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Charlie Choe, Michael Baio, Junda Zhu, : Edward Rumell, Shanlin Shah, Jared : Levin, Daniel Tokich, David Vansciver, : Rebeccah Lavitan, Namita Kalyan, : Moataz Elrafie, Adam Murray, : Christopher Kui, Monica Burton, : Patrick Lyman, Stephen Ficchi, Joan : Schwartz, Meredith Armstrong, : Brandon Karpo, Gennady Spector, : Daniel Bigler, Dan Dubiner, Paul Kim, : Pamela Beatrice, Bidlur S

ORDER PER CURIAM: We certify to the California Supreme Court the questions set forth in Part II of this order. The answers to the certified questions depend upon California law, and the answers may be determinative of the outcome of the present appeals. We find no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the California Supreme Court. The answers pr

403 F.3d 631 Leslie J. GRISHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A., a corporation; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp., individually and as successor to the American Tobacco Company and its predecessor in interest, British American Tobacco Industries, PLC, Defendants-Appellees.Maria Cannata, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Philip Morris USA, Inc., aka Philip Morris; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Defendants-A

191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II

859 F.Supp. 887 (1994) UNITED STATES of America v. John F. "Duffy" CONLEY, William C. Curtin, Sheila F. Smith, John Francis "Jack" Conley, Thomas "Bud" McGrath, Mark A. Abbott, Thomas Rossi, William Steinhart, Roberta Fleagle, Robin Spratt, Monica C. Kail, William J. Reed, Joanne T. Smith, Kenneth "Ron" Goodwin, Lawrence N. "Neudy" Demino, Sr., Christopher "Chris" Kail, Joseph A. Devita, Frank Garofalo, Thomas D. Ciocco, Michael Sukaly, Phillip M

264 F.3d 344 (3rd Cir. 2001) IN RE: ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1014)J.T. Bradley and Kathy W. Bradley, Appellants in No. 00-3899Regina M. Luellen and Eurston Luellen, Sr., Appellants in No. 00-3900Randal Jon Uribe, Appellant in No. 00-3901Mitchell H. Walker and Kim S. Walker, Appellants in No. 00-3902Jose Morfin, Appellant in No. 00-3903Mary K. Mullen Schmelter and Kurt Allen Schmelter, Appel

96 Ill.2d 1 (1983) 449 N.E.2d 53 BURL WARRIOR et al., Appellees, v. JAMES R. THOMPSON, Governor, et al., Appellants. No. 57897. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed March 14, 1983. Rehearing denied May 27, 1983. *2 *3 Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney Gene

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20

OPINION OF THE COURT REAVLEY, Circuit Judge. This Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA) claim against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for granting clearance to market certain types of pedicle screw fixation devices (referred to generally as bone screws) was dismissed by the District Court pursuant to the discretionary function exception to the FTCA.1 Appellants contend here that