⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

18 opinions for “Monica A. Vasquez and Jose Rafael Vasquez”

California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2017-09-25 · Published · cited 54× · 223 Cal. Rptr. 3d 547; 15 Cal. App. 5th 686; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 827
HOFFSTADT, J. *694A brewer of beer decided to replace one of its distributors, and sent that distributor a letter terminating their distribution contract and invoking the statutory procedure requiring an existing distributor to negotiate and, if necessary, arbitrate with its successor to settle the "fair market value" of its distributorship rig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 2× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 7× · 534 F.3d 1320; 2008 WL 2880345
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-06-07 · Published · cited 106× · 650 F.3d 350; 2011 WL 2207110
650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020-04-01 · Published · cited 164× · 954 F.3d 502
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
California Court of Appeal · 1991-08-13 · Published · cited 27× · 233 Cal. App. 3d 347; 284 Cal. Rptr. 560; 91 Daily Journal DAR 10069; 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6478; 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 937
233 Cal.App.3d 347 (1991) 284 Cal. Rptr. 560 MARY LOUISE MACHADO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B046980. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. August 13, 1991. *350 COUNSEL Burton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-08-19 · Published · cited 26× · 770 F.3d 1300; 23 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 365; 2014 WL 4068351; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15917
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 316× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 534 F.3d 1320; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1638; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15964
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 12× · 899 F.3d 567
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Employees of Conagra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC, (ConAgra) appeal the dismissal of their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. , and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, Ark. Code § 11-4-201, et seq. , arguing that factual disputes preclude summary j
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2024-10-25 · Published · cited 0×
08-24-00155-CR through 08-24-00157-CR 08-24-00199-CR ACCEPTED 08-24-00155-CR 08-24-00159-CR through 08-24-00161-CR 08-24-00201-CR through 08-24-00202-CR EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS 08-24-00163-CR through 08-24-00180-CR 08-24-00204-CR through 08-24-00209-CR EL PASO, TEXAS