Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Monday Group, Inc., A Nevada Corp.”
APS Capital Corp. v. Mesa Air Group, Inc.public domain
580 F.3d 265 (2009) APS CAPITAL CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MESA AIR GROUP, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-50770. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 20, 2009. *267 James Joseph Scheske (argued), Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Austin, TX, Heather Lynn Peckham, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld,
Reading International, Inc. v. Malulani Grouppublic domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT THE MALULANI GROUP, LIMITED’S RENEWED MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S ALLEGED BREACH NO. 6, DOC. NO. 133 J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On March 19, 2013, Plaintiff Reading International, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Reading”) filed this action alleging several breaches of a se
424 F.Supp.2d 1119 (2006) MANITOWOC MARINE GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 03-C-0232. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 27, 2006. *1120 *1121 *1122 Aaron H. Kastens, David A. Krutz, Michael Bes
Focus Management Group USA, Inc. v. Kingpublic domain
ORDER MARY S. SCRIVEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff Focus Management Group USA, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt.82), Defendant Edmund King’s Response in Opposition (Dkt.97), Plaintiffs Reply (Dkt.100), and the Parties’ Stipulation of Agreed Material Facts (Dkt.98). Upon consideration of all relevant filings, case l
February 14, 2023 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3 346 Conn. 33 FEBRUARY, 2023 33 Connecticut Dermatology Group, PC v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co. CONNECTICUT DERMATOLOGY GROUP, PC, ET AL. v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. (SC 20695) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auri
671 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2009) G.K. LAS VEGAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Sheldon Gordon, Plaintiffs, v. SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV-S-04-1199 DAE-GWF. United States District Court, D. Nevada. November 30, 2009. *1204 Ann M. Galvani, David Boies, Richard E. Weill, Robert B. Silver, Christopher M. Green, Boies Sc
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Maez v. Springs Automotive Group, LLCpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BLACKBURN, District Judge. The matter before me is plaintiffs Amended Motion for Class Certification [# 47]1 filed May 26, 2010. I grant the motion. I. JURISDICTION I have jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 (federal question) and 1367 (supplemental jurisdiction)
Thomas v. Corbyn Restaurant Development Corp.public domain
Filed 5/27/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN THOMAS, D083655 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2021- 00047188-CU-PO-NC) CORBYN RESTAURAN
Brophy v. DAY & ZIMMERMAN HAWTHORNE CORP.public domain
799 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2011) Shannon BROPHY et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAY & ZIMMERMAN HAWTHORNE CORP. et al., Defendants. No. 3:10-cv-00035-RCJ-RAM. United States District Court, D. Nevada. July 5, 2011. *1190 Ian E. Silverberg, Hardy Law Group, Reno, NV, for Plaintiffs. Kenneth R. Bick, Reno, NV, for Defendants.
In Re Aston-Nevada Ltd. Partnershippublic domain
391 B.R. 84 (2006) In re ASTON-NEVADA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Debtor. No. BK-S-04-18335-BAM. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada. January 25, 2006.[*] *90 Kurt K. Harris, Scott E. Chapman, Henderson, NV, for Debtor. OPINION REGARDING SANCTIONS BRUCE A. MARKELL, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is
Nevada v. United States Department of Energypublic domain
517 F.Supp.2d 1245 (2007) State of NEVADA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, and its secretary, Samuel Bodman, Defendants. No. 3:06-CV-153-ECRRAM. United States District Court, D. Nevada. September 27, 2007. *1246 *1247 State of Nevada: Charles J. Fitzpatrick, Joseph R. Egan, a
Crossville, Inc. v. Kemper Design Center, Inc.public domain
758 F.Supp.2d 517 (2010) CROSSVILLE, INC., Plaintiff, v. KEMPER DESIGN CENTER, INC., Jerome H. Berkemeyer, Jim Berkemeyer, and Edward Spar, Defendants. Case No. 2:09-cv-0120. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Cookeville Division. December 14, 2010. *519 J. Brad Scarbrough, Law Office of Brad Scarbrough, PLC, Brentwood
General Motors Corp. v. Phat Cat Carts, Inc.public domain
504 F.Supp.2d 1278 (2006) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. PHAT CAT CARTS, INC., a Florida corporation f/k/a The Little Car Company, Inc., Defendant. No. 8:06-cv-900-SCB-MSS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. October 18, 2006. Preliminary Injunction Order November 1, 2006. Order on Moti
Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc.public domain
Opinion by Judge CALLAHAN;1 Separate Opinion by Judge SILVERMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge HALL: Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN. ORDER AND OPINION ORDER The petition for panel rehearing is granted in part and denied in part. The Opinion filed August 21, 2009, and appearing at 578 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir.2009), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as preceden
Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc.public domain
Opinion by Judge CALLAHAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge SILVERMAN CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: Mike Rutti sought to bring a class action on behalf of all technicians employed by Lojack, Inc. (“Lojack”) to install alarms in customers’ cars. He sought compensation for the time they spent commuting to worksites in Lojack’s vehicles and for time spent on preliminary and postliminary
Perez v. Paragon Contractors Corp.public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Tena Campbell, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Following an investigation into complaints that Paragon Contractors Corporation (Paragon), a company in Hildale, Utah, was using child labor in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Secretary of Labor (the Secretary) filed this lawsuit. The parties reached an agreement resol
In re Barrick Gold Corp.public domain
NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This action is not an environmental regulatory proceeding or an environmental tort suit. Rather, it is a federal securities class action filed on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired shares of the common stock of defendant Barrick Gold Corp. in the United States or on a U.S.-based stock exchange between February 16, 2017, and April 24, 2017, inclus
Bangkok Broadcasting & T v. Co. v. IPTV Corp.public domain
742 F.Supp.2d 1101 (2010) BANGKOK BROADCASTING & T.V. CO., LTD., a Thailand Corporation, Plaintiff, v. IPTV CORPORATION, a California Corporation, et al., Defendants. And Related Counterclaim. No. CV 09-03803 SJO (SSx). United States District Court, C.D. California. May 11, 2010. *1106 Howard Wisnia, Sanjay Bhandari of Ba
USCA11 Case: 22-13129 Document: 88-1 Date Filed: 01/16/2026 Page: 1 of 211 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13129 ____________________ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,