⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Monarch Air Group, LLC v. Journalism Development Network, Inc.”

District Court, S.D. California · 2018-06-12 · Published · cited 16× · 316 F. Supp. 3d 1234
(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF MARKETQUEST'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 205]; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT BIC CORP.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 216]; AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS BIC USA AND NORWOOD'S MOTION
District Court, E.D. California · 2011-05-18 · Published · cited 11× · 821 F. Supp. 2d 1178; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54462; 2011 WL 1885407
821 F.Supp.2d 1178 (2011) Jeffrey ALTMAN, Plaintiff, v. HO SPORTS COMPANY, INC., dba Hyperlite, and Does 1 to 100, Defendants. No. 1:09-cv-1000 AWI JLT. United States District Court, E.D. California. May 18, 2011. *1180 Illya Hooshang Broomand, Gold River, CA, for Plaintiff. *1181 Rando
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2009-10-30 · Published · cited 30× · 422 B.R. 783; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 4355
422 B.R. 783 (2009) In re TOUSA, INC., et al., Debtors. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Citicorp North America, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-10928-JKO. Adversary No. 08-1435-JKO. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division. October 30, 2009. *
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Trump v. Vancepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-07-09 · Published · cited 57× · 591 U.S. 786; 140 S. Ct. 2412; 207 L. Ed. 2d 907
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2019 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
NetChoice v. Paxtonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-09-16 · Published · cited 17× · 49 F.4th 439
Case: 21-51178 Document: 00516474571 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/16/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013-12-19 · Published · cited 223× · 83 A.3d 901; 623 Pa. 564
*913 OPINION Chief Justice CASTILLE. Mr. Chief Justice Castille announces the Judgment of the Court. Mr. Chief Justice Castille delivers the Opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, IV, V, and VT(A), (B), (D)-(G), in which Mr. Justice Baer, Madame Justice Todd, and Mr. Justice McCaffery join, and delivers an Opinion with respect to
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-09-29 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00142-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 15-25-00142-CV 9/29/2025 12:00 AM
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-02-14 · Published · cited 2× · 844 F. Supp. 2d 377; 2012 WL 479576; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18504
OPINION SWEET, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Prior Proceedings.........................................................382 II. Findings of Pact..........................................................382 A. The Parties..........................................................382 1. The Plaintiff.......