⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Mohamed Adam”

District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-08-28 · Published · cited 5× · 967 F. Supp. 2d 647; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130674; 2013 WL 4807612
MEMORANDUM & ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. Before the court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim arguing, among other things, that Plaintiff’s legal malpractice claims are time-barred. Because Plaintiff filed these claims more than nine years after the alleged malpractice, and because Plaintiff has failed to adequately allege that Def
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-02-26 · Published · cited 0× · 557 F. App'x 229
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mohamed Adam Abdelshafi seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate
State v. Mostafapublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 570 S.W.3d 634
PER CURIAM: Mohamed Mostafa appeals his conviction in the Boone County Circuit Court for rape and sentence of twenty-five years' imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he claims the trial court erred in admitting DNA test results into evidence. Mostafa asserts that DNA results were fruit of the poisonous tree. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgmen
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-KA-01273-COA MOHAMED MOHAMED A/K/A MOHAMED APPELLANT ANAGI MOHAMED v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. W. ASHLEY HINES COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUI
Supreme Court of the United States · 2010-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 178 L. Ed. 2d 108; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6648; 131 S. Ct. 182; 562 U.S. 874; 79 U.S.L.W. 3199
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. *109Same case below, 592 F.3d 602.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2024-07-09 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued July 9, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00197-CV ——————————— TAREK MOHAMED ZAGHLOUL, Appellant V. MAY ABD ELSAYED, Appellee
State v. Mohamedpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-09-19 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 Ohio 3785
[Cite as State v. Mohamed, 2019-Ohio-3785.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 17AP-920 (C.P.C. No. 16CR-4257) v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Muhuba Mohamed,
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025-06-20 · Published · cited 0×
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2024-1406 Lower Tribunal No. 2024-SC-011304-O _____________________________ MOHAMED GHAZALL, Appellant, v. JAMES GRUBB and MYRIAM GRUBB,
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2018-03-13 · Published · cited 15× · 300 F. Supp. 3d 857
Sam A. Lindsay, United States District Judge Before the court are: Defendant City of Irving's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 35), filed June 6, 2017; Defendant Irving Independent School District's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 38), filed June 29, 2017; Defendant Daniel Cummings's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 39), filed June 29, 2017; Defenda
Ohio Supreme Court · 2020-09-25 · Published · cited 11× · 166 N.E.3d 1132; 162 Ohio St. 3d 583; 2020 Ohio 4585
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Mohamed v. Eckelberry, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-4585.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or
State v. Ahmedpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010-11-23 · Published · cited 0× · 791 N.W.2d 296; 2010 Minn. App. LEXIS 164; 2010 WL 4721591
OPINION HARTEN, Judge.* Appellants were each charged with fifth-degree controlled substance crime. They moved to dismiss the charges on the ground that the substance in their possession was not a controlled substance; their motions were denied. Each appellant then waived his right to a jury trial and submitted his case on stipulated facts to the district court, which found eac
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010-01-25 · Published · cited 96× · 592 F.3d 602; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1568; 2010 WL 279357
592 F.3d 602 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohamed Adam ABDELSHAFI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-4884. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: December 2, 2009. Decided: January 25, 2010. *604 ARGUED: John Britton Russell, Jr., Durrettebrad-Shaw, PLC, Midlothian, Virginia,
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017-12-14 · Published · cited 2× · 286 F. Supp. 3d 884
JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge This religious accommodation suit stems from the decision of defendant employer Jacobson Warehouse Company, Inc. to cease allowing Muslim employees to use an area of the production floor for daily prayers during break times. Muslim employees had prayed in the otherwise empty and unused area for several years until Jacobson expanded its production lines. Jacobson converted the area into
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-2320 MOHAMED M. MUTHANA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Secretary of Homeland Security, ∗ et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal fro
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-04-24 · Published · cited 12× · 922 F.3d 129
Per Curiam: Adnan Ibrahim Harun Adam Hausa, a member of al-Qaeda, attacked United States and Afghan coalition forces in Afghanistan, including one assault that resulted in the death of two American soldiers. Italian authorities arrested Hausa in 2011 and extradited him to the United States for trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Korman, J.; Cogan, J. ). H
District Court, E.D. New York · 2017-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 258 F. Supp. 3d 265
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER COGAN, District Judge. Before the Court are two motions by defendant — one motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, or in the alternative for acquittal, as to Count Two of the Indictment and one motion for a judgment of acquittal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(a), as to Counts One (or to dismiss the Indictment as to this Count, in the alternative), Three,
District Court, E.D. New York · 2017-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 232 F. Supp. 3d 282; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132760; 2017 WL 1359946
*285MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER COGAN, District Judge. Before me is defendant Adnan Ibrahim Harun a Hausa’s (“Harun”) motion to suppress all statements he has made because they were directly or indirectly made absent proper warnings pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and 18 U.S.C. § 3501, [redacted
District Court, E.D. New York · 2017-01-12 · Published · cited 0× · 232 F. Supp. 3d 257; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66587; 2017 WL 1372660
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER COGAN, District Judge. Before me is defendant’s motion to declare the Classified Information Procedures Act (“CIPA”), 18 U.S.C. app. Ill, unconstitutional as applied in this case because it violates defendant’s Fifth and Sixth Amendments rights and because the Government is using its declassification authority as a “sword” to deny defendant his rights to discovery under the
State v. Yusufpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003-12-15 · Published · cited 0× · 119 Wash. App. 1047; 2003 Wash. App. LEXIS 3469
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 02-8-03333-6, Dale B. Ramerman, J., entered December 12, 2003. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015-03-04 · Published · cited 1× · 779 F.3d 665; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3505; 2015 WL 912947
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Mohamed Bouras, a citizen of Algeria, was granted status as a conditional permanent resident based on his marriage to a U.S. citizen. That marriage ended by divorce before Bouras had obtained unconditional permanent residency. He was later placed in removal proceedings after he failed to convince the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services that he had entered the marriage in goo