Cases

10-3161-cv(L) ASCAP v. MobiTV, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2011 Heard: October 11, 2011 Decided: May 22, 2012 Docket Nos. 10-3161-cv(L), -3310-cv(CON) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, Defendant-Appellant,

681 F.3d 76 (2012) AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, Defendant-Appellant, v. MOBITV, INCORPORATION, f/k/a/ Idetic, Incorporation, Appellee. Docket Nos. 10-3161-cv(L), 10-3310-cv(CON). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Heard: October 11, 2011. Decided: May 22, 2012. *77 Ira M. Fe

712 F.Supp.2d 206 (2010) In re APPLICATION OF MOBITV, INC. Related to United States of America, Plaintiff, v. American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers, Defendant. Nos. 09 Civ. 7071 (DLC), 41 Civ. 1395 (DLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 11, 2010. *208 Kenneth L. Steinthal, Joseph R. Wetzel, H

REDACTED OPINION AND ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...............................................................209 FINDINGS OF FACT...........................................................211 I.ASCAP and Its Two Competitors..........................................211 II.The Cable

PROST, Chief Judge. In these consolidated cases, EON Corp. IP Holdings LLC (“EON”) asserts U.S. Patent No. 5,668,757 (“'757 patent”) against a number of defendants. The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, holding all claims of the '757 patent invalid as indefinite. In particular, the district court found that the specification failed to disclose an algorithm to provide structure for various com

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Eon Corp. IP Holdings LLC (“plaintiff’) filed the present patent litigation against 17 parties on September 23, 2010.1 (D.I. 1) Plaintiff filed its first amended complaint (D.I. 33) on October 28, 2010, which defendants moved to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) f

PER CURIAM. These appeals are taken from an opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cote, /.), dated March 14, 2014, filed under seal and entered March 14, 2014, and filed publicly March 18, 2014 and entered March 19, 2014, along with all pre- ■ liminary findings, rulings, and orders subsumed therein, including an opinion and order dated and entered September 17, 2013. <

CHIN, Circuit Judge: In 1941, the United States brought an antitrust action against the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (“ASCAP”). The suit resulted in a consent decree that provided certain protections for prospective music licensees. Where, for example, ASCAP and a prospective licensee have reached an impasse over fees, under the consent decree, either may

14-1158-cv(L) Pandora Media, Inc. v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term, 2014 7 Nos. 14‐1158‐cv(L), 14‐1161‐cv(Con), 14‐1246‐cv(Con) 8 9

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2014-1392 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:13-c

OPINION & ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS *319INTRODUCTION. co CO o FINDINGS OF FACT. CO CO CO I. The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers . Co co CO A. ASCAP Background. CO CO CO B. The ASCAP Consent Decree. CO CO CO</

OPINION AND ORDER REDACTED VERSION WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge: This proceeding is before the Court for the setting of interim fees for a blanket license for the public performance of any of the more than two million musical compositions in the repertory of the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (“ASCAP”) on the wireless telephones and oth

607 F.Supp.2d 562 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS, et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Application for the Determination of Reasonable License Fees for Performances via Wireless Transmissions and Internet Transmissions by AT & T Wireless f/k/a Cingular Wireless. Civil Action No. 41-1395 (WCC). United States District Court

627 F.3d 64 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS and PUBLISHERS, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, In the matter of Applications of RealNetworks, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., Applicants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. Docket Nos. 09-0539-cv (L), 09-0542-cv (con), 09-0666-cv (xap), 09-0692-cv (xap), 09-1572-cv (xap). United States Court of Appeals, Secon