Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mizrahi v. The City of New York”
Geltzer v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Geltzer v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 02191) Geltzer v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 02191 Decided on April 16, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
People v. Mizrahipublic domain
People v Mizrahi (2025 NY Slip Op 02227) People v Mizrahi 2025 NY Slip Op 02227 Decided on April 16, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Santiago v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Santiago v City of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 04041) Santiago v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 04041 Decided on June 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Mizrahi v. YMZ Realty LLCpublic domain
Mizrahi v YMZ Realty LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 01741) Mizrahi v YMZ Realty LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 01741 Decided on March 15, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
People v. Mizrahi (Arlene)public domain
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, againstArlene Mizrahi, Appellant. New York City Legal Aid Society (Amy Donner of counsel), for appellant. Richmond County District Attorney (Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Barbara I. Panepinto, J.), rendered March 13, 20
COMMONWEALTH v. NATHAN MIZRAHI.public domain
MIZRAHI, COMMONWEALTH vs., 100 Mass. App. Ct. 690 COMMONWEALTH vs. NATHAN MIZRAHI. 100 Mass. App. Ct. 690 December 1, 2021 - February 2, 2022 Court Below: Superior Court, Suffolk County Present: Milkey, Blake, & Grant, JJ. Firearms. Practice, Criminal, Motion to suppress, New trial, Assistance of counsel, Duplicati
Mizrahi v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. Inc.public domain
Mizrahi v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 02228) Mizrahi v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 02228 Decided on April 05, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Repor
Mizrahi v. Flaumpublic domain
*590When the Bankruptcy Trustee, Kenneth P. Silverman, abandoned the instant legal malpractice claim at the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceedings, the claim immediately revested with the debtor, Jennifer Mizrahi (see 11 USC § 554; Guiffrida v Storico Dev., LLC, 60 AD3d 1286 [2009]; Culver v Parsons, 7 AD3d 931 [2004]). Thus, the Supreme Court providently exercised its
Casavecchia v. Mizrahipublic domain
*706The plaintiff and the defendant William W. Mizrahi are members of and shareholders in the defendant real estate development companies, Hills of Heartland, LLC (hereinafter Hills), and Casa Mason Corp. (hereinafter CMC), respectively. The plaintiff commenced this action after Mizrahi, acting as the manager for Hills, diverted $100,000 of Hills’ funds, to which the plaintiff was entitled as a dis
Mizrahi v. Gonzalespublic domain
492 F.3d 156 (2007) Alon MIZRAHI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES,[*] Attorney General, Respondent. No. 05-0010-ag. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: March 30, 2006. Decided: June 27, 2007. Sarita Kedia (Julie R. Jones, on the brief), Law Offices of Sarita Kedia, New York, NY, for Petitioner. David S. Ruben
US Bank, National Ass'n v. Mizrahipublic domain
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated September 13, 2012, which, sua sponte, directed dismissal of the complaint unless it filed a motion for summary judgment within 60 days, (2) an order of the same court dated November 29, 2012, which, sua sponte, directed dismissal of the complaint based on its failure
Mizrahi v. Cannonpublic domain
867 A.2d 490 (2005) 375 N.J. Super. 221 Renee MIZRAHI and Jack Mizrahi, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. James CANNON and Roseann Cannon, Defendants-Appellants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 12, 2005. Decided February 22, 2005. *491 William T. Smith, Newark, argued the cause fo
*868It is undisputed that on July 29, 2009, this proceeding was “marked off’ the calendar after the petitioner failed to appear at the Supreme Court’s calendar call. Contrary to the respondents’ contention, CPLR 3404 does not apply to this pre-note of issue proceeding (see Varricchio v Sterling, 86 AD3d 535, 536 [2011]; Mitskevitch v City of New York, 78 AD3d 1137, 1138 [2010];
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge: Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, but the makers of Louis Vuitton leather goods have not been pleased by the recent flood of counterfeit Vuitton handbags in the New York area. The French corporation, whose pocketbooks are sold for upwards of $200, is facing stiff competition from midtown
Emanuel Mizrahi, DDS, P.C. v Angela Andretta, DMD, P.C. (2019 NY Slip Op 02315) Emanuel Mizrahi, DDS, P.C. v Angela Andretta, DMD, P.C. 2019 NY Slip Op 02315 Decided on March 27, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department
City of New York v. Desire Videopublic domain
—Supplemental judgment and order (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered August 12, 1999, which, after an evidentiary hearing, inter alia, enjoined defendants-appellants from operating an adult bookstore from the ground floor premises of the building located at 68 Reade Street in New York County, directed that the premises be closed for one year, and directed defendants Desire Video, Inc., and Ygal Mizrahi to pay pe
Mizrahi v. Chanel, Inc.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Richard B. Lowe, III, J. In this action, plaintiffs Isaac Mizrahi and IM Holdings, Inc. dispute, inter alia, the proper distribution of the assets of a dissolved limited partnership. Defendants Chanel, Inc. and American Fragrances, Inc. now move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), (7) and (10). *3
Redington v. United Mizrahi Bank Ltd.public domain
WYATT, District Judge. This is an appeal by the trustee for the liquidation of Weis Securities, Inc. (Weis) under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (SIPA, 15 U.S.C. § 78aaa and following) from an order of Bankruptcy Judge Babitt, filed November 20, 1975. The order provides for allocation of the total of administrative expenses incurred by the trustee during the period of May 30, 1973 to May 31, 1974 between the
Chamberlain v. City of White Plainspublic domain
16-3935 Chamberlain v. City of White Plains In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term, 2018 Argued: March 22, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2020 Docket No. 16-3935
CHURCH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT OF WAYLAND & others v. MARILYN J. HEINRICH & others (and a companion case ).public domain
CHURCH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT OF WAYLAND vs. HEINRICH, 101 Mass. App. Ct. 32 CHURCH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT OF WAYLAND & others [Note 1] vs. MARILYN J. HEINRICH & others [Note 2] (and a companion case [Note 3]). 101 Mass. App. Ct. 32 October 6, 2021 - May 5, 2022 Court Below: Superior Court, Middlesex County Present: Milkey, Henry, & Walsh, JJ.