Cases

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 469 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-21-528 IN THE MATTER OF LINDA Opinion Delivered November 16, 2022 RUSHTON SELMAN, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON APPEAL FROM THE COLUMBIA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT FRANK D. SELMAN

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 469 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-21-528 IN THE MATTER OF LINDA Opinion Delivered November 16, 2022 RUSHTON SELMAN, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON APPEAL FROM THE COLUMBIA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT FRANK D. SELMAN

*201Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON joined. Judge GREGORY wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION KING, Circuit Judge: Uuno Mattias “Matt” Baum appeals from the district court’s Opinion and Order of September 2007, dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus r

Fearing, J. — ¶1 Former RCW 71.09.070 (2011) requires the State of Washington Department of Social and Health *361 Services (DSHS) to evaluate a sexually violent person’s condition at least once every year to determine if continued civil commitment is warranted. This appeal asks: What happens if DSHS v

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. George Rushton, plaintiff/appellant, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Warren (the “City”) and Dennis DeVooght. defendants/appellees, as well as the district court’s denial of Rushton’s motion for leave to amend his complaint. Rushton, a former Warren police officer, charges the City and DeVooght. Rushton’s former commanding officer, with age discrimination. S

This is a case of first impression involving the children's trust fund which was established in connection with the Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Act. The State Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Board (Board) filed a petition in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief. The Board sought a declaratory judgment that monies appropriated to the children's trust fund which were remaining at the end of the 1984-85 fiscal year did not rev

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-174-CV A PLUS INVESTMENTS, INC. APPELLANT V. WALTER R

A-PLUS INVESTMENTS, INC. V. RUSHTON COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-174-CV A PLUS INVESTMENTS, INC. APPELLANT </

Opinion by Mb.. Justice McCollum, The plaintiff, Mary Rushton, claims $30,000 as damages for an injury she received in May, 1895, by a fall into a coal hole or chute in the center of a sidewalk on Federal street, in Allegheny city, and her husband, Henry Rushton, claims $10,000 to compensate him for the loss or impairment of her services, for medical treatment provided for her, and for the extra help required b

The defendants were informed against and charged with a violation of Act No. 328, § 436, Pub. Acts 1931 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 17115-436, Stat. Ann. § 28.691), which reads as follows: "Any person who shall mingle any poison with any food, drink or medicines, with intent to kill or *Page 174 injure any other person, or shall wilfully poison any spring, well or reservoir of water, with such intent, shall be guilty of a felony."

198 F.Supp. 337 (1961) Edward L. RUSHTON, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SOBER, INC., a Michigan corporation, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 3975. United States District Court W. D. Michigan, S. D. September 12, 1961. *338 Dee Edwards, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff. Matheson, Dixon & Bieneman, and Robert Alan Parr, Detroit, Mich., for d

The appellant was tried and convicted of embezzlement under the first count of an indictment drawn under Code 1923, § 3960, which count reads as follows: "The Grand Jury of said County charge that before the finding of this indictment, S. M. Mitchell, alias Shack Mitchell, whose name is to the Grand Jury otherwise unknown, being the agent of R. W. Summerlin, did embezzle or fraudulently converted to his own use or to the use of another, or fraudulently secretes with intent to convert to

512 So.2d 778 (1987) Alfred H. MITCHELL, as Director of the Alabama Department of Finance v. The STATE CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT PREVENTION BOARD (Children's Trust Fund). Civ. 5964-X. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. June 17, 1987. Rehearing Denied July 22, 1987. *779 Richard B. Garrett, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen. of R

OPINION OF THE COURT D. Bruce Crew, III, J. Plaintiff, First Bank & Trust Company of Ithaca, New York, moves for summary judgment on its complaint seeking to foreclose a mortgage given to it by defendants, Jack L. Mitchell and Sylvia I. Mitchell (hereinafter the Mitch-ells), and seeking an adjudication of the liability of these defendants and the defendant, Mitchell’s Kawasaki & Power Equipment, Inc.

MAYFIELD, J. The bill is one to enforce specific performance of a contract, and to enjoin respondents from interfering with the performance thereof pending the suit. The respondents demurred to and -answered the bill, denying its equity, and moved to dissolve the injunction issued upon its filing. On the hearing upon *478these issues the injunction was dissolved and the b

February 26, 1904. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This action for the foreclosure of a mortgage of real estate was commenced July 30th, 1900. The only defense set up in the answer was usury. An order was made September 26th, 1901, referring the case to T. H. Spain, Esq., master, to take testimony and report his conclusions of law and fact. The master made his report, November 15th, 1902, finding that there was no usury, and recommending judgment in the full amount claimed by the pl

NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: This is a case about cotton. B. B. King once called cotton "a force of nature"-"[t]here's a poetry to it," he wrote, "hoeing and growing cotton." 1 Here, the poetry of the hoeing and growing has given way to a *

44 F.Supp.2d 1249 (1999) Aleck S. MASON and Blanche M. Mason, Plaintiffs, v. Vicki Aletta LEE, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 98-T-799-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. April 8, 1999. G. Griffin Sikes, Jr., Montgomery, AL, for plaintiffs. *1250 Ronald G. Davenport, D. Mitchell Henry, Rushton, Stakely

928 F.Supp. 1092 (1996) Charles PICKETT, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-D-1376-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 25, 1996. J. Knox Argo, Argo & Holloway, P.C., Montgomery, AL, for plaintiff. D. Mitchell Henry, Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett, Montgomery

606 F.3d 1142 (2010) UNITED STATES of America; California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Plaintiffs-Appellees, APW North America; Cardinal Industrial Finishes; Eemus Manufacturing Corp.; International Medication Systems, Ltd.; Norf James Jebbia Testamentary Trust; Roc-Aire Corporation; Janneberg Marital Trust; Smittybilt, Inc.; Southern California Edison Company; Andruss Family Trust, Defendants-Appellees, v. AEROJET GENERAL CORP.; A