Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 17, 2002 Session PATSY MITCHELL, ET UX. v. DR. JAMES ENSOR, M.D., ET AL. A Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. 98798 T.D. The Honorable D'Army Bailey, Judge No. W2001-01683-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 18, 2002 Patient brought medical malpractice action against phys

TAMM, Circuit Judge. This case presents for our determination the permissibility and legality of certain awards of compensation to the guardian ad litem, temporary conservator and permanent conservator of the person and estate of the appellant. It arises on appeal from orders of the district court granting compensation to those office

270 Md. 549 (1973) 312 A.2d 286 ENSOR v. ENSOR [No. 91, September Term, 1973.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided December 6, 1973. The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES and LEVINE, JJ. *550 John H. Garmer for appellant. Russell

519 So.2d 1244 (1987) Herman ENSOR and Ensor, Baccus & Williamson, P.A. v. Misty WILSON, a minor, who sues by and through her next friend and natural father, Robert WILSON 85-1499. Supreme Court of Alabama. October 23, 1987. Rehearing Denied February 12, 1988. *1245 Bibb Allen, Thomas W. Christian and Karen O

PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs seek an injunction restraining defendant, the Chief of Police of Baltimore County, “from restricting the Plaintiffs and each of them from meeting or holding a public meeting, gathering, rallies or debate in any public park or other meeting place where members of the public customarily meet for conversation, consultation and exchange of information in Baltimore County,” and, particularly, from holding “a

494 So.2d 498 (1986) Henry MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 85-650. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 11, 1986. Rehearing Denied September 16, 1986. *499 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and L.S. Alperstein, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Enloe, C. J. The complaint in this case was in two paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer interposed by appellee for want of facts was sustained, and the appellants,. refusing to plead further, suffered a judgment to be rendered against them for costs; from which this appeal is prosecuted. The errors assigned challenge the action of the “court in sustaining said demurrers. The first paragraph of the complain

OPINION & ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On November 15, 2012, Maxcimo Scott brought this action, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, against Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (“Chipotle”) alleging mis-classification and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), and New York law. On February 13, 2013, plaintiff filed an amended complaint (

ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On February 13, 2015, the plaintiffs wrote to renew their application to compel the defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (“Chipotle”) to produce Chipotle’s co-CEO Montgomery F. Moran for a deposition, and attached six sealed exhibits in support thereof. The plaintiffs seek to depose Moran because they assert that he has non-eu-mulative know

CORRECTED * MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DUTY TO DEFEND; STAYING PROCEEDINGS; AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE DAVID NUFFER, District Judge. Table of Contents Case Overview.................................................................1313 Motion to Strike..............................................

OPINION & ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: The plaintiff and class representative Maxcimo Scott filed a nationwide class and collective action complaint on November 15, 2012, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. (“FLSA” or the “Act”), and the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law, art. 6 § 190 et seq., art. 19 § 650 et seq. (“NYL

ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On March 27, 2015, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order (the “March 27 Order”) (ECF No. 942) granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion to compel the production of certain documents. In relevant part, the Court ruled that the report of consultant Cinda Dag-gett (the “Daggett Report”) was not privileged because Daggett was

ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiffs filed a complaint on November 15, 2012, and an amended complaint on Feb*190ruary 13, 2013, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (“FLSA”), and the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law, art. 6 §§ 190 et seq., art.

OPINION & ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: The plaintiff and class representative Max-cimo Scott filed a nationwide class and collective action complaint on November 15, 2012, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. (“FLSA” *39or the “Act”), and the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: This discovery dispute arises between plaintiffs and defendant corporation Chipo-tle Mexican Grill, Inc., in a nationwide collective action alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§• 201 et seq. (“FLSA” or the “Act”), and class action claims under the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law, art. 6 §§ 1

86 F.Supp.2d 1027 (2000) Jacob HARWOOD, Plaintiff, v. The HOWARD GROUP, INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendant. The Howard Group, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Planning Committee for the Senior Class of Junction City High School 1997, an unincorporated association; Barbara L. Dussell; Arlene Rothenberger; Kathy Shear; and Kathy Johns, Third-Party Defendants. No. Civ. 98-6364-TC.

CONNER, J. Andrew Benjamin filed a rule 3.190(c)(4) motion to dismiss his charge of carrying a concealed firearm, which the trial court granted. The State appeals, arguing that because different inferences can be drawn from the undisputed evidence, the concealment issue cannot be determined as a matter of law. We agree. Factual Background and Trial

PER CURIAM. " This case concerns the application of the relation-back doctrine to wrongful-death claims. The trial court allowed James 0. Kidd, Sr., the personal representative of the estate of Madeline Kidd, deceased, to use relation back to sustain his claims against various health-care , providers. Some of those providers — Mobile Infirmary Association d/b/a Mobile Infirmary Medical Center, Dr.' Roger Alvarado, Dr. Barbar

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT LONA LEANN GROSSHART, ) ) Appellant, ) v. ) WD83672 ) ) OPINION FILED: KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT ) April 13, 20

35 F.Supp.2d 875 (1998) Shirley BAKER, Plaintiff. v. DANEK MEDICAL, et al., Defendants. Nos. GCA 95CV10033 MMP, GCA 95CV10154 MMP. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division. September 1, 1998. *876 *877 Thomas J. Kliebert, Jr., Kliebert & Heltz PC, Gramercy, LA, for