Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mitchell v. Bell”
Mitchell v. Bellpublic domain
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the deter*875mination at issue herein dated April 29,
Mitchell v. Bellpublic domain
In re Mitchell, Dennis; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, *478supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, Nineteenth Judicial District, Div. “C”, No. 408142; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA95 0298. Denied. VICTORY, J., not on panel.
Mitchell v. Bell South Corporationpublic domain
915 F.2d 696 Mitchellv.Bell South Corporation*** NO. 88-8929 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. SEP 05, 1990 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga.
Jeff Mitchell Bell Jr v. State of Floridapublic domain
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D19-4270 _____________________________ JEFF MITCHELL BELL JR, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County. Wade Mercer, Judge. September 14, 2020 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Owens
Mitchell v. Bellpublic domain
MEMORANDUM JOHNSON, Chief Judge. John N. Mitchell originally received a sentence of 30 months to eight years. This *1045sentence was modified on October 4, 1977, to a sentence of one to four years. Mitchell began his incarceration on June 22, 1977. Subsequently he was granted a medical furlough of approximately five months in duration. On July 5, 1
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., LP v. Mitchellpublic domain
Justice HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice BRISTER, Justice JOHNSON, and Justice WILLETT joined. In Continental Casualty Co. v. Downs, we construed section 409.021(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act1 to preclude a carrier from contesting the compensability of an employee’s injury unless, within seven d
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Mitchellpublic domain
276 S.W.3d 452 (2005) SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a SBC Texas, Appellant, v. William C. MITCHELL, Beneficiary of Louise Mitchell, Decedent, Appellee. No. 04-04-00466-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. January 26, 2005. *453 Lawrence D. Smith, John J. Franco, Jr., and Virginia C. Honeyman, Maureen McNiec
Wayne E. Mitchell v. Ricky Bell, Wardenpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE WAYNE E. MITCHELL v. RICKY BELL, WARDEN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 91-S-816 Seth W. Norman, Judge No. M2005-00599-CCA-R3-HC - Filed September 23, 2005 The Defendant, Wayne E. Mitchell, appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his petition seeking habeas corpus relief. The State has fi
Bell v. Bellpublic domain
68 So.3d 321 (2011) Jodie C. BELL, Appellant, v. Mitchell K. BELL, Appellee. No. 4D10-40. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. August 10, 2011. Rehearing Denied September 21, 2011. *322 Robin Bresky of the Law Offices of Robin Bresky, Boca Raton, for appellant.
Bell v. Mitchellpublic domain
Affirmed.
Bell v. Mitchellpublic domain
The question to be answered in this case is what is the effect of a legislative amendment to the probate claim statute enacted while this litigation was before the court? Janice M. Mitchell was issued Letters Testamentary as Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of Ellis M. Mitchell, Deceased, on January 8, 1990, in the Chancery Court of Warren County, Mississippi. Notice to Creditors was published. On January 25, 1990, John E. Bell presented his claim for probate to the War
Cook v. Bellpublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2014 UT 46 IN THE S UPREME C OURT OF THE S TATE OF U TAH MERRILL COOK , PAUL BRUGGER, and MARA BRENENSTALL, Appellants, v. LT . GOVERNOR GREG BELL and SALT LAKE COUNTY CLERK ’S OFFICE , Appellees.
Mitchell v. Glacier Countypublic domain
10/25/2017 DA 16-0716 Case Number: DA 16-0716 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2017 MT 258 ELAINE MITCHELL, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs and Appellants,
Seigler v. Bellpublic domain
LAMBERT, J. Theresa A. Seigler (“Mother”) petitions this court to issue a writ of certiorari and a writ of mandamus regarding the order *475granting Robin Bell’s (“Grandmother”) motion for rehearing or reconsideration in a proceeding to revoke a temporary custody order entered pursuant to chapter 751, Florida Statutes. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss the p
December 19, 2008 Mr. Mike A. Hatchell Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell, LLP 100 Congress Avenue, Suite 300 Austin, TX 78701-4042 Mr. Alan D. Tysinger Miller & Tysinger, P.C. 6243 I.H. 10 West, Suite 800 San Antonio, TX 78201 RE: Case Number: 05-0171 Court of Appeals Number: 04-04-00466-CV Trial Court Number: 2003-CI-10437 Style: SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, L.P., D/B/A SBC TEXAS v. WILLIAM C. MITCHELL, BENEFICIARY OF LOUISE MITCHELL, DECEDENT Dear Cou
State v. Gerald P. Mitchellpublic domain
DANIEL KELLY, J. (concurring). ¶ 67 I do not believe the state can waive the people's constitutional protections against the state. I nonetheless concur because performing a blood draw on an unconscious individual who has been arrested for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63
Bell v. Donleypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Patricia Bell (“Bell”) and Jacqueline Burton (“Burton”) (collectively, *177 “Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Michael Donley, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force. Plaintiff
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ No. 05-0171 ════════════ Southwe
Rodney Keister v. Stuart Bellpublic domain
MAY, District Judge: Rodney Keister appeals the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction. Mr. Keister sought to enjoin University of Alabama (“UA”) officials from applying UA’s grounds use policy to the intersection of University Boulevard and Hackberry Lane. Application of this grounds use policy prevents him from speaking on UA’s campus u
Bell v. Western Surety Co.public domain
Karen King Mitchell, Judge Western Surety Company (Surety) appeals the entry of judgment against it on Rashaunda Bell’s petition for payment of money owed under a motor vehicle dealer bond issued by Surety and its principal, KC Trend Auto, in favor of the State of Missouri. Surety brings four points on appeal, all arguing that it should not have been held liable for the full amount of the bond ($25,000). Finding no error, we