Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 14‐2946 ARTHUR MITCHELL, Petitioner‐Appellant, v. DONALD ENLOE, Warden, Respondent‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of

Mulvey, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (O’Connor, J.), entered March 14, 2016 in Albany County, ordering, among other things, equitable distribution of the parties’ marital property, upon a decision of the court. Plaintiff (hereinafter the wife) and defendant (hereinafter the husband) were married in 2005 and have two children (born in 2006 and 2008). This action for divorce was commenced in

Mulvey, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (O’Connor, J.), entered March 14, 2016 in Albany County, ordering, among other things, equitable distribution of the parties’ marital property, upon a decision of the court. Plaintiff (hereinafter the wife) and defendant (hereinafter the husband) were married in 2005 and have two children (born in 2006 and 2008). This action for divorce was commenced in

NUMBER 13-18-00168-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ORRY ARTHUR, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 24th District Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Arthur Mitchell admitted to killing Ricky Neal on February 5, 1995 by striking him with a brick. The killing arose out of a dispute when Neal was working on Mitchell’s car in the backyard of Neal’s home. Mitchell asserted that he acted in self-defense after Neal attacked him with a wrench. The prosecution presented forensic evidence that refuted Mitchell’s claim of self-defense. -

WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Esh Kodesh Gilmore (“Gilmore”), a United States national, was killed in a shooting attack in Jerusalem on October 30, 2000. His family members and estate (collectively, “Appellants”) filed suit against the Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority (“PA”) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (“PLO”) (collectively, “Appellees”)- asserting claims un

IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana Arthur Moore, FILED Oct 01 2024, 8:46 am Appellant-Defendant CLERK Indian

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-1958 Filed May 8, 2024 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DOUGLAS ARTHUR HAGENOW, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, DeDra Schroeder, Judge. A defendant appeals his convictions for sexual abuse. AFFIRMED.

DEBORAH S. EYLER, J. John T. Mitchell applied to the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration (“MVA”) for vanity plates bearing the letters MIERDA. The application was granted. Two years later, the MVA received a complaint from a member of the public about Mitchell’s vanity plates. It investigated and determined that “mierda” is the Spa

LOUitl OF CUMINAl J\7\>EI\LS t\us·-yr_l,L JEX/\S ·1~,} /l-,a.-a. t?

Chief Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court. We address today the Fifth Amendment limits on asking a suspect to unlock his phone when the device has been seized pursuant to a valid search and seizure authorization.1 Because Appellee had previously invoked his right to counsel, we hold that the Government violated his Fifth Amendment rights as protected by Edwards v.

OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Arthur Tyler, an Ohio inmate sentenced to death for the 1983 murder of Sander Leach, filed in the district court in 2013 an amended motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). The judgment from which Tyler sought relief was entered in 2002. In his amended motion, Tyler req

RILEY, Chief Judge. Arthur Gallagher sued the City of Clayton, Missouri (City), and several city officials (defendants) in their official capacities under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, challenging a city ordinance prohibiting outdoor smoking on certain public property. Gallagher alleged the ordinance violated both the United States and Missouri Constitutions. After the defendant

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0281p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ GENESIS HILL, ┐ Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, │

Kaplan, Mitchell H., J. The plaintiff, Massachusetts Education and Government Association Property & Casualty Self-Insurance Group, Inc. (“MEGA”), brought this action against the defendant, Town of Saugus (“Saugus”), asserting claims for breach of contract and quantum meruit arising from unpaid worker’s compensation insurance premiums. Before the court is MEGA’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, MEGA’s

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for • Summary Judgment, filed April 13, 2012 (Doc. 27)(“MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on May 18, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether Walter Mitchell committed perjury in the damages trial in Mitchell v. City of Santa Fe, No. CIV 05-1155 (D.N.M.), held

</

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-06-271-CR ARTHUR LEE PIERSON, JR. APPELLANT V.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-06-271-CR ARTHUR LEE PIERSON, JR. APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF

OPINION PELANDER, Presiding Judge. ¶ 1 In this personal injury action, the primary issue on appeal is whether students who perform a routine errand at a teacher’s request on school grounds during school hours can be deemed school “employees” under Arizona’s Workers’ Compensation Act. Although its facts and procedural history are simple, this case presents rather complicated legal issues of firs