Cases

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARTHA BEARD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C. A. No. 2023-0027-LM ) ANGELA DAVIS, Administrator of the ) Estate of Moses A. Brunson, Jr., ) )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 108,061 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. HENRY PETERSEN-BEARD, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Lifetime postrele

Kennedy, J. *571 {¶ 1} In this expedited election case, relators, Jonathan C. Beard and a committee in support of an initiative petition, Everyday People for Positive *572 </

People v Beard (2024 NY Slip Op 00053) People v Beard 2024 NY Slip Op 00053 Decided on January 09, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

People v Beard (2024 NY Slip Op 00053) People v Beard 2024 NY Slip Op 00053 Decided on January 09, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

Conley Byrd, Justice. Appellees Mr. & Mrs. A. H. Beard brought this action jointly and severally against appellants Lloyd Mitchell and J. T. Williams to recover under the Arkansas Securities Law, the value of two bonds given in a real estate transaction and against appellant J. T. Williams individually upon a common law count of fraud. The trial court, based upon the jury’s answer to inter

272 F.Supp.2d 464 (2003) Christopher MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS; Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D,; Ben Varner, Warden; and William S. Ward, Chairman of the Parole Board, Defendants. No. CIV.A.3:02-CV-2219. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. July 22, 2003. *465 Francis R. Filipi, Office of Atty. Gen., Harris

KLIEBERT, Chief Judge. The plaintiff, Mitchell Beard, instituted this action for damages or, alternatively, worker’s compensation benefits, on December 29, 1987 alleging that over the course of his employment from 1965 to 1979 he was exposed to various offensive fumes and noxious and dangerous dusts, sands, and chemicals which caused him to contract a chronic lung injury which had disabled him. The ori

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2893 ___________________________ Sease Michael Beard Plaintiff - Appellee v. Doris Falkenrath, Warden, JCCC; Nathan Falter, CO III, JCCC; Carignan, CO I, JCCC; Jeremy Epps

PER CURIAM This case concerns the construction of the nearly identical wills of Vencie and Melba Beard. Vencie and Melba were a married couple. Vencie shot and killed Melba shortly before taking his own life. The wills' disposed of each testator’s separate property and all of the couple’s community' property. Each will contained the following provision: “If both my [husband/wife and I] die in a common disaster or under circu

09/12/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 1, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TOMAR DONYELLE BEARD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 22-189 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. This appeal by a group of Daikon Shield claimants in a Chapter 11 corporate reorganization proceeding involving the appellee A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, challenges the constitutionality of Section 1141(d), 11 U.S.C. It is conceded that Section 1141(d) provides that the confirmation of the plan of reorganization discharges all claims of any kind against a corporate debtor in a reorganizat

NO. 12-22-00213-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS KELDRON BEARD, § APPEAL FROM THE 145TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: The parties to this appeal raise several questions: whether Mitchell Energy & Development Corporation (MEDC) is a fiduciary of its Voluntary Incentive Retirement Program (VIRP); whether the Texas prohibition on waivers of claims for unemployment compensation, Tex. Lab.Code § 207.071 (

OPINION JAMES KNOLL GARDNER, District Judge. *630 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF DECISION. PROCEDURAL HISTORY. C* CO to CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES. ^ CO CD Petitioner’s Contentions. ^ CO CD Respondent

917 So.2d 1160 (2005) Mitchell BEARD v. Deborah Smith BEARD. No. 05-CA-302. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. November 29, 2005. *1161 Maria M. Chaisson, Attorney at Law, Destrehan, Louisiana, for Plaintiff/Appellant. Panel composed of Judges JAMES L. CANNELLA, MARION F. EDWARDS, and SUSAN M. CHEHARDY. MA

FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, P. J., HODGES and PIPKIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules June 9, 202

468 F.Supp.2d 720 (2006) Abel CARABELLO v. Jeffrey A. BEARD. Civil Action No. 06-336. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. December 28, 2006. *721 Abel Carabello, Graterford, PA, pro se. John O.J. Shellenberger, Office of the Attorney General, Philadelphia, PA, for Jeffrey A. Beard. MEMORANDUM</

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Eloise Beard, 1 appeals from a jury verdict finding the defendant, Roy Martin Mitchell, not guilty of depriving her deceased brother of rights secured by the United States Constitution. Plaintiff seeks a new trial on the grounds that the

OPINION CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Antyane Robinson appeals the District Court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Robinson received a death sentence after a jury convicted him of first degree murder and related charges. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court.