⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Misty D. Lay”

Idaho Supreme Court · 2021-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO DOCKET NO. 48007 JARED SOMMER and KATHERINE ) SOMMER, husband and wife, ) ) Plaintiffs-Respondents- ) Cross Appellants, ) Twin Falls, Sept. 2021 Term ) v. )
Idaho Supreme Court · 2021-12-21 · Published · cited 11× · 511 P.3d 833; 170 Idaho 413
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO DOCKET NO. 48007 JARED SOMMER and KATHERINE ) SOMMER, husband and wife, ) ) Plaintiffs-Respondents- ) Cross Appellants, ) Twin Falls, Sept. 2021 Term ) v. )
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023-09-29 · Published · cited 0×
DELVIN BREAUX * NO. 2023-CA-0062 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL OCHSNER CLINIC, LLC, * OCHSNER CLINIC FOURTH CIRCUIT FOUNDATION, MISTY SURI, * MD, AND DERYK JONES, MD STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2018-03-22 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-16-00392-CV ________________ JIMMY RAY ROBERSON JR. AND MISTY ROBERSON, Appellants V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee _______
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012-06-29 · Published · cited 40× · 816 N.W.2d 378; 2012 WL 2479588; 2012 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 71
CADY, Chief Justice. In this case, we must decide whether the district court erred in admitting exhibits directed to the issue of fault in a pharmacy malpractice action that were not disclosed during the pretrial discovery. The court of appeals found the district court abused its discretion by not excluding the evidence as a sanction for violating both the pretrial order of the di
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2026-05-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED January 2026 Term May 18, 2026 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2006-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 9, 2005 Session MISTY MICHELLE GLISSON v. MOHON INTERNATIONAL, INC./CAMPBELL RAY Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry County No. 1941, Julian P. Guinn, Judge No. W2004-01588-SC-R3-CV - Filed March 13, 2006 The employer in this workers’ compensat
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016-03-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 4, 2016 MARLENE J. BIDELMAN-DYE V. JAMES D. DYE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 12-D-201 Hon. Jacqueline S. Bolton, Judge No. E2014-01891-COA-R3-CV – Filed March 29, 2016 In this post-divorce matter, numerous issues arose after the former wife, the primary
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016-03-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 4, 2016 MARLENE J. BIDELMAN-DYE V. JAMES D. DYE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 12-D-201 Hon. Jacqueline S. Bolton, Judge No. E2014-01891-COA-R3-CV – Filed March 29, 2016 In this post-divorce matter, numerous issues arose after the former wife, the primary
Texas Supreme Court · 2015-05-08 · Published · cited 32× · 462 S.W.3d 1; 58 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 832; 2015 Tex. LEXIS 437; 2015 WL 2173786
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 13-0042 444444444444 GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC., PETITIONER, v. RICKY MATAK, BELINDA MATAK AND MISTY SONNIER, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF W ALTER PETE LOGAN M ATAK, D
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2012-12-06 · Published · cited 1× · 462 S.W.3d 80; 2012 WL 6061779; 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 10103
MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice BENAVIDES. In this products liability action, appellant Genie Industries, Inc. (“Genie”) appeals an. adverse jury verdict. By three issues, Genie asserts that: (1) the evidence •is legally insufficient to establish that the product in controversy possessed a design defect; (2) the tri
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991-04-15 · Published · cited 20× · 569 N.E.2d 983; 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 603; 1991 WL 59794
569 N.E.2d 983 (1991) FRITO-LAY, INC., Appellant (Defendant below), v. Toni CLOUD, in Her Own Name and by Her Next Friend and Parents, Doyle and Cindy Cloud, Appellee (Plaintiff below), and the State of Indiana, by and through the Department of Highways of the State of Indiana, Appellee (Defendants below). No. 10A04-8909-CV-00413.[1] Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District.
State v. Woodspublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013-05-15 · Published · cited 1× · 115 So. 3d 708; 2013 WL 1977004; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 928
WILLIAMS, J. | defendant, Misty D. Woods was charged by bill of indictment with second degree murder, in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:30.1. Pursuant to a plea agreement, she pled guilty to manslaughter and was sentenced to serve 20 years at hard labor without benefit of probation or suspension of sentence. Defendant appeals, challenging her sentence as constitutionally excessive. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2004-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Opinion filed June 24, 2004 Affirmed and Opinion filed June 24, 2004. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Trahan v. Trahanpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-09-16 · Published · cited 5× · 203 So. 3d 447; 2016 La.App. 1 Cir. 0108; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 1661
McDonald, j. Lin this appeal, a former wife challenges a judgment finding her in contempt of court for failing to pay a money judgment owed to her former husband in their community property partition suit. We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Darren and Misty Trahan were divorced in 2010. After the divorce, Mr. Trahan filed a petition to partition the couple’s community property. L
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011-09-09 · Published · cited 0× · 83 So. 3d 512; 2011 WL 3963005; 2011 Ala. LEXIS 142
Cantrell Brown petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion granting a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Arlington Properties, Inc. ("Arlington").Ex parte Arlington Props., Inc., [Ms. 2090038, March 26, 2010] ___ So. 3d ___, ___ (Ala. Civ. App. 2010) (per Judge Moore, with one judge concurring and one judge concurring in the result). We issued the writ; we now reverse and remand. Facts and Procedural Hist
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019-02-27 · Published · cited 0× · 266 So. 3d 452
WILLIAMS, C.J. The plaintiff, Misty Price, on behalf of her minor daughter, Tamia Price, appeals a district court judgment granting partial summary judgment and a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant, the Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund. The plaintiff also appeals the trial court's denial of her motion for a new trial. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS On Septemb
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-02-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 22, 2013 Session FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. JAMES W. FRIERSON ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 11C909 W. Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Judge No. E2012-00715-COA-R3-CV-FILED-FEBRUARY 21, 2013 This is one of three cases consolidated for oral ar
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2026-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
RENDERED: JULY 10, 2026; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2025-CA-1609-ME J.D.; A.D.; AND E.D. APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM HENDERSON FAMILY COURT v. HONORABLE DAVID CURLIN, JUDGE ACTION NO. 25-J-00094-001 COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES; B.T.;
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019-02-27 · Published · cited 0× · 266 So. 3d 452
WILLIAMS, C.J. The plaintiff, Misty Price, on behalf of her minor daughter, Tamia Price, appeals a district court judgment granting partial summary judgment and a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant, the Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund. The plaintiff also appeals the trial court's denial of her motion for a new trial. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS On Septemb