Cases

827 N.E.2d 17 (2005) 356 Ill. App.3d 998 292 Ill.Dec. 870 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernie SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-03-2257. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. March 22, 2005. Rehearing Denied May 4, 2005.

People v Myke (2024 NY Slip Op 05991) People v Myke 2024 NY Slip Op 05991 Decided on November 27, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

67 F.3d 855 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7820, 95 Daily JournalD.A.R. 13,443UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Paul SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50265. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 9, 1995.Decided Oct. 5, 1995. Oswald Parada, Deputy Federal

People v Lopes (2022 NY Slip Op 02285) People v Lopes 2022 NY Slip Op 02285 Decided on April 6, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

279 S.C. 449 (1983) 309 S.E.2d 11 F. Delano GURLEY, William Neff and Miriam R. Neff, Respondents, v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant. 0002 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. November 7, 1983. *450 G. Dewey Oxner, Jr., of Haynsworth, Perry, Bryant, Marion & Johnstone, Gr

387 S.E.2d 556 (1989) Katherine L. CROSS, Executrix of the Estate of Miriam Tate, Deceased, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. No. CC995. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. December 6, 1989. *557 Lane O. Austin, Sanders, Austin & Swope, Princeton, Richard G. Rakes, Gentry, Locke, Rakes & Moore, Roa

People v Areizaga (2021 NY Slip Op 05864) People v Areizaga 2021 NY Slip Op 05864 Decided on October 27, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

826 So.2d 23 (2002) CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, v. The CITY OF NEW ORLEANS. No. 2001-CA-0635. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. April 10, 2002. Rehearing Denied May 30, 2002. Writs Granted November 1, 2002. *24 Gilbert R. Buras, Jr., New Orleans, LA, for Plain

RICHARD A. LAZZARA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 59) and Plaintiff's *1273Response (Dkt. 61). After careful review of the allegations of the Amended Complaint (Dkt. 58), the arguments of the counsel, and the applicable law, the Court concludes the motion should be grant

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES R. SPENCER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on a Motion to Lift Stay for Limited Purpose of Granting Leave to File Amended Answer and Entering Judgment Based on Collateral Estoppel filed by Defendant Lanier Parking Systems of Virginia, Inc. (“Lanier”) (ECF No. 85). The remaining Defendants have either adopted Lanier’s Motion (ECF Nos. 87, 90, 91) or sepa

534 F.Supp. 745 (1982) Carole ZICKLIN, Plaintiff, v. G. W. BREUER, et al., Defendants. No. 81 Civ. 3387. United States District Court, S. D. New York. March 24, 1982. *746 Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, & Specthrie, New York City, for plaintiff Carole Zicklin and proposed intervenors Sydney Weston, Dana Winslow, Dr. Sanford Rollins

SAVOY, Judge. Plaintiff instituted a boundary action, to which defendants answered and also entered a plea of prescription. The lower court overruled the plea of prescription and ordered a survey be made to establish the boundary. Thereafter, the survey and procés verbal of the court-appointed surveyor were homologated. As a result, the boundary line was established approximately fifty feet farther south,

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

374 F.Supp. 516 (1974) Doris YORDEN, Administratrix of the Estate of Samuel Reed, Deceased, and Miriam Reed, in her own right, Plaintiffs, v. Irving FLASTE, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 3925. United States District Court, D. Delaware. April 11, 1974. *517 John G. Siegle, Siegle, Scallan, March & Berman, Media, Pa., and Garry G. Gre

311 S.W.3d 752 (2010) James KLOTZ and Mary Klotz, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, v. ST. ANTHONY'S MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant, Michael Shapiro, M.D., and Metro Heart Group, LLC, Respondents/Cross-Appellants. No. SC90107. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. March 23, 2010. As Modified May 25, 2010. *757 Louis M.

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Apr 06 2020, 9:15 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals the defense of res judicata, collateral

104 Cal.Rptr.2d 839 (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 791 Carlos Francisco MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; The People, Real Party in Interest. No. B145701. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One. March 7, 2001. Rehearing Denied March 26, 2001. As Modified April 4, 2001.

9 Cal.Rptr.3d 190 (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 297 Robert GARCIA et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. DIRECTV, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. B158570. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One. January 28, 2004. *191 Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, Dale H. Oliver, Michael Ernest

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint, filed March 15, 2016 (Doc. 8)(“First Motion”); and (ii) the' Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint Against Administrative Law Judge Miriam Fernandez-Rice, filed April 19, 2016 (Doc. 18)(“Second Motion”).1 The Cou

Morgan, J.* ¶1 The trial court granted the State’s petition to terminate the parent-child relationship between Rogelio Salas and his daughter, A.B. The Court of Appeals affirmed by unpublished opinion. In re Welfare of A.B., 140 Wn. App. 1024 (2007). We granted Salas’ motion for discretionary review. In re Welfare of A.B., 164 Wn.2d 1001, 192 P.3d 368 (2008). Salas now argues (1) th