Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Miranda Stoudemire”
Stoudemire v. Statepublic domain
1 Reporter's note: Rehearing was originally denied February 25, 1986, but the court, by order dated March 19, 1986, set aside that denial and restored the rehearing application to the docket of the court. Milton Alexander Stoudemire was indicted and convicted for burglary in the third degree and theft in the first degree. Sentence was twenty years' imprisonment and restitution in the amount of $13,575. From
State v. Fordpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Ford, 2026-Ohio-2180.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 115098 v. : BRUCE FORD, :
Slakman v. Statepublic domain
632 S.E.2d 378 (2006) SLAKMAN v. The STATE. No. S06A0288. Supreme Court of Georgia. June 26, 2006. Reconsideration Denied July 27, 2006. *380 Donald F. Samuel, William Charles Lea, Garland, Samuel & Loeb, P.C., Atlanta, for Appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Christopher Michael Quinn, Asst. D
Glidewell v. Statepublic domain
630 S.E.2d 621 (2006) 279 Ga. App. 114 GLIDEWELL v. The STATE. No. A06A0227. Court of Appeals of Georgia. April 27, 2006. *626 Brian Steel, Atlanta, for appellant. Fredric D. Bright, District Attorney, Gregory L. Bushway, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. MIKELL, Judge. Robert
Rush v. Statepublic domain
Under an indictment charging murder in the first degree appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree and the jury fixed his punishment at twenty-five years in the penitentiary. In the presence of his attorney at arraignment appellant waived reading of the indictment and pleaded not guilty. After sentence was imposed he gave notice of appeal. He was found to be indigent and was furnished a free transcript. Trial counsel represents him on this appeal. At approximately 1
Miller v. Statepublic domain
The appellant was indicted and tried for the offense of murder in the first degree. She was convicted for the offense of manslaughter in the first degree and the jury fixed her punishment at three years in the penitentiary. Final judgment was entered by the trial court in accordance with the verdict of the jury and appellant brought this appeal. The evidence presented by the State shows that the appellant and the deceased, Chauncey D. Williams, were living together at 116 River
State v. Gilbertpublic domain
Ness, Justice. This appeal is from the murder conviction and death sentence of appellants Larry Gilbert and J. D. Gleaton. We affirm the convictions, set aside the death sentences, and remand for a re-sentencing proceeding. In the early afternoon of July 12, 1977, Ralph Stoudemire was shot and stabbed to death at his South Congaree service station in Lexington County. Approximately $200.00 was stolen. Witnes
Gilbert v. Moorepublic domain
Nos. 96-12 and 96-13 reversed, and Nos. 96-15 and 96-16 affirmed, by published opinion. Judge WILKINS wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judges WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS joined. Judge HAMILTON joined in the majority opinion except Parts VI A and VI B and wrote an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Judge MICHAEL and Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ joined in the majority opinion ex
Gilbert v. Moorepublic domain
Filed: February 24, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Nos. 96-12(L) (CA-84-2135-6-2AK, CA-84-2792-6-2AK) Larry Gilbert, Petitioner - Appellee, versus Michael W. Moore, etc., et al, Respondents - Appellants.
134 F.3d 642 Larry GILBERT, Petitioner--Appellee,v.Michael W. MOORE, Director of the South Carolina Departmentof Corrections, in his official capacity; CharlesM. Condon, Attorney General of the Stateof South Carolina,Respondents--Appellants.J.D. GLEATON, Petitioner--Appellee,v.Michael W. MOORE, Director of the South Carolina Departmentof Corrections, in his official capacity; CharlesM. Condon, Attorney
Smiley v. Statepublic domain
The appellant, Arthur James Smiley, was convicted for the murder of Beatrice Brown and was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment. Four issues are raised on this appeal from that conviction. I The appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal. Although the State's evidence against the appellant was entirely circumstantial and very weak, we find it barely sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. That e