Cases

Rel: August 29, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA SPECIAL TER

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-00-278-CV THOMAS MARVELLI, M.D. APPELLANT V. MINNIE ALSTON APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 352nd DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT

Marvelli v. Alston COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-00-278-CV THOMAS MARVELLI, M.D. APPELLANT V.

J-S54032-20 2021 PA Super 123 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : CHARLES E. WILLIAMS :

[Cite as Star Merchandise, L.L.C. v. Haehn, 2016-Ohio-8018.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Star Merchandise, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 16AP-39 v. : (C.P.C. No. 14CVH-8192) Christopher J. Haehn

WARD, Circuit Judge. [1 j September 11, 1913, there lay at anchor in a line along the eastern edge of the channel opposite the coal docks of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company at South Amboy, N. J., a schooner, above her the loaded coal barge Canton and above her still other barges. The channel is narrow, runs northwest and southeast, and the tide was ebb. A schooner’ was coming down on the west side of th

OPINION Opinion by Justice Lang This interlocutory appeal was filed by Adam C. Leonard following the trial court’s denial of his special appearance in a lawsuit filed against him by his former employer, Salinas Concrete, LP (“Salinas”). Specifically, Salinas asserted claims against Leonard for breach of fiduciary duties during and after his employment, brea

561 N.W.2d 618 (1997) 1997 ND 48 In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Ruben J. PETERSON, Deceased. Minnie BERGER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ruben J. Peterson, Deceased, Clay Berger, Terry Bertelsen and Monte Bertelsen, Petitioners and Appellees, v. Dale A. PETERSON, Ronald B. Peterson, Virgil O. Peterson, Merle L. Peterson, Jeanine C. Kirschbaum, and Lila J. Close, Respondents and Appellants.

PRESIDING JUSTICE WEBBER, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The majority rely upon a fact not sustained in the record and upon conduct of the parties subsequent to the conveyance to reconstruct by inference what the intent of the parties was. I do not quarrel with the extensive authority cited in the principal opinion but suggest that it is i

532 U.S. 411 (2001) C & L ENTERPRISES, INC. v. CITIZEN BAND POTAWATOMI INDIAN TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA No. 00-292. United States Supreme Court. Argued March 19, 2001. Decided April 30, 2001. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA *413 *413 Ginsburg, J., delivered th

FRIENDLY, Chief Judge: Louis Cramer and his wife Minnie, partners in an auto parts business in Ithaca, New York, appeal from their conviction after a jury trial in the District Court for the Northern District of New York, of willful tax evasion, 26 U.S. C. § 7201, and willful assistance in the preparation of false tax returns, 26 U.S. C. § 7206(2). The four-count indictment char

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge. There is absent from this appeal any assertion that the findings of fact made by the district judge sitting without a jury are unsupported by the evidence. Under Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., “Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witnesses.” Af

GINSBURG, Chief Judge, dissenting. The Court today holds the District of Columbia violated the substantive component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States based upon a murder that, as far as the evidence shows and common sense dictates, the District could neither have foreseen nor, by taking reasonable precautions, prevented. I therefore join neither the opinio

The Town of Lansing in Ashe County, North Carolina (hereafter, Town) conducted a bond referendum on 17 June 1986 in order to construct a water and sewer system. A week prior to the vote on the bond referendum, by letter dated 9 June 1986 to the town's residents, the Town Clerk/Finance Officer urged support of the bond referendum, stating that the Town had no intention of requiring *Page 768 mandatory water hook-ups to the proposed water and sewer

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-1417 Filed May 12, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. WILLIAM BURTON, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Randy V. Hefner, Judge. William Burton appeals his conviction for second-degree robbery. AFFIRMED. Erin M. Carr of

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, United - States District Judge Presently pending and ready for resolution in this employment discrimination case is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General of the United States (“Defendant”). (ECF No. 66). Also pending is a motion for leave to file a surreply filed by Plaintiff Connell Dones (“Plaintiff’). (ECF No. 78).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1613 Filed October 30, 2024 WILLIAM EDGAR BURTON III, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, David Nelmark, Judge. William Burton III appeals the district court’s denial of his application for postcon

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 92-CA-00823-SCT AUBREY C. GRIFFIN, JR. v. PAMELA G. NICOLAS ARMANA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 6/5/92 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DENISE SWEET-OWENS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: B. KENDALL GRIFFIN J. PEYTON RANDOLPH, II ATTORNEYS FO

616 F.3d 315 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Naim Nafis SHAKIR, a/k/a Naim Shakir a/k/a James Perry Naim Nafis Shakir, Appellant. No. 09-2665. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 13, 2010. Filed August 10, 2010. *316 Joseph F. Minni, [Argued], Office of United States Attorney, Philadelp

OPINION Opinion by Justice Longoria Appellants, Gray, Ritter & Graham, P.C. (“GRG”), Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLC (‘WHAFH”), Neblett Beard & Arsenault LLP (“NBA”), Don M. Downing, and Adam J. Levitt, appeal the trial court’s denial of their special appearances. Appellants served as leaders