Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic De v. Pederson”
Minnesota v. United States Steel Corp.public domain
JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER NEVILLE, District Judge. Before the court are eight separate civil treble damage suits bottomed on the antitrust laws, brought by eight different governmental entities against six steel companies. The City of St. Paul, Minnesota, commencéd its action on February 1, 1968, by filing a complaint in the Third Division of the District of Minnesota. Thereafter, the Housing and Redevelopment
21-1365 (en banc) Soule ex rel. Stanescu v. Connecticut Association of Schools, Inc. United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Argued en banc: June 6, 2023 Decided: December 15, 2023 No. 21-1365 SELINA SOULE, A MINOR, BY BIANCA STANESC
Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am. v. Cuomopublic domain
THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge *104I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff the National Rifle Association of America ("Plaintiff" or "the NRA") commenced this action against defendants New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, both individually and in his official capacity ("Gov. Cuomo"); Superintendent of the New York State Dep
BEAM, Circuit J. A certified class of potash consumers appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants (collectively “the producers”) in this action for conspiracy in restraint of trade under section 1 of the Sherman Act. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND This ease involves the production and sale of potash, a mineral essential to pla
176 F.3d 1055 1999-1 Trade Cases P 72,515 BLOMKEST FERTILIZER, INC.; Cobden Grain & Feed, on behalfof themselves and all others similarly situated; Plaintiffs,Hahnaman Albrecht, Inc.; John Peterson, doing business asAlmelund Feed & Grain; Laing-Gro Fertilizers,Inc.; Plaintiffs--Appellants,Clearbrook AG Service, Inc., on behalf of itself and allothers similarly situated; Reamford Li
576 P.2d 1204 (1978) 281 Or. 137 CITY OF LA GRANDE, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYES RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE STATE OF OREGON, Clay Myers, As Secretary of State of the State of Oregon, La Grande Police Association, and La Grande Firefighters' Union, Local No. 924, International Association of Firefighters, American Federation of Labor, Congress of Industrial Organization, Canadian Labour Congress, Pet
257 N.W.2d 425 (1977) SOUTHERN VALLEY GRAIN DEALERS ASSN., a North Dakota Unincorporated Association, Petitioner [Appellant below] and Appellant, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF RICHLAND COUNTY, North Dakota, Respondent [Appellee below] and Appellee. Civ. No. 9321. Supreme Court of North Dakota. August 18, 1977. *426
Joyce Vallone v. CJS Solutions Group, LLCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2874 ___________________________ Joyce Vallone, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Erasmus Ikogor, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants,
Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonrypublic domain
735 N.W.2d 713 (2007) James E. GLUBA, deceased, by Lorraine GLUBA, Relator, v. BITZAN & OHREN MASONRY and Grinnell Mutual Group, Respondents. No. A06-1849. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 26, 2007. *716 DeAnna M. McCashin, Schoep & McCashin, Chtd., Alexandria, MN, for Employee/Relator. Dianne E. Walsh, Heacox, Har
United States v. John Markertpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-3332 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. John Anthony Markert llllll
HAWKE YE COMMODITY PROMOTIONS, INC. v. Millerpublic domain
432 F.Supp.2d 822 (2006) HAWKE YE COMMODITY PROMOTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Thomas J. MILLER, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Iowa, and Kevin W. Techau, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Iowa Department of Public Safety, Defendants. No. C-06-2026-LRR. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division. April 26, 2006.
D.W. v. Radisson Plaza Hotel Rochesterpublic domain
958 F.Supp. 1368 (1997) D.W., A.K., S.M., T.M., A.R., and C.H., Plaintiffs, v. RADISSON PLAZA HOTEL ROCHESTER; Chafoulias Companies, Inc.; Chafoulias Management Co.; BDG5 Limited Partnership; Maddux Properties, Inc.; Premier Security, Inc.; G.A.C. Corporation; Gus A. Chafoulias and Andrew C. Chafoulias, Defendants. Civil File No. 3-96-514. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.
United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.public domain
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge EDWARDS. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. *544EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: Suspecting that his employer, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) was being defrauded by two companies with whom it had contracted to supply new rail cars with improved toilet sys
Un del Pueblo Entero v. Nelsonpublic domain
Case: 22-50775 Document: 191-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/31/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit _____________ FILED Decembe
Campaign for Southern Equality v. Bryantpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. Two same-sex couples brought this lawsuit challenging Mississippi’s laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. One couple wishes to marry in Mississippi; the other was married out-of-state and wants Mississippi to recognize the marriage. A group advocating for gay and lesbian equality has joined their effort to seek relief on behalf of it
Gruenke v. Miles, Inc., Welfare Planpublic domain
872 F.Supp. 652 (1995) Steven R. GRUENKE, Richard J. Sytkowski, Kevin A. Welniak, Larry R. Sundem, Gregg A. Pederson, Tracy K. Coates, Cheryl A. Abellas, Cathy L. Alexander, Debra A. Criner, Jill A. Dunham, Gail W. Giles, Sinnie F. Goodman, William J. Hearney, Richard C. Maehr, Jr., Gary T. McCall and Rommel D. Mendoza, Plaintiffs, v. MILES, INC., WELFARE PLAN, Miles Inc., Benefit Plan Administrative Committee, Fred Salek and Hans Thieme, Defenda
Grutter v. Bollingerpublic domain
137 F.Supp.2d 821 (2001) Barbara GRUTTER, Plaintiff, v. Lee BOLLINGER, Jeffrey Lehman, Dennis Shields, Regents of the University of Michigan, and the University of Michigan Law School, Defendants, and Kimberly James, Farah Mongeau, Jeanette Haslett, Raymond Michael Whitlow, Shabatayah Andrich, Dena Fernandez, Shalamarel Kevin Killough, Diego Bernal, Julie Fry, Jessica Curtin, James Huang, Heather Bergman, Ashwana Carlisle, Ronald Cruz, No
343 N.W.2d 334 (1983) William LAYMAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee, v. BRAUNSCHWEIGISCHE MASCHINENBAUANSTALT, INC., a Corporation, and BMA Machinery and Equipment Corporation, a Corporation, Defendants, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants. Civ. No. 10449. Supreme Court of North Dakota. December 29, 1983. *335
Quiban v. US Veterans Admin.public domain
724 F.Supp. 993 (1989) Domingo P. QUIBAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 86-2155. United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 11, 1989. As Corrected July 20, 1989. *994 Domingo P. Quiban, Quezon City, pro se. Kenneth Steven Kaufman, Beveridge &
Siirila v. Barriospublic domain
Williams, J. (to concur). We originally granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether the standard of care for general practitioners should be judged by the practice in the same or similar communities. Counsel for the defense has cogently argued that the issue of the viability of the locality rule as a measure of the standard of care of general practitioners wa