⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic De v. Pederson”

District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968-05-17 · Published · cited 126× · 44 F.R.D. 559; 12 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 498; 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12589; 1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,469
JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER NEVILLE, District Judge. Before the court are eight separate civil treble damage suits bottomed on the antitrust laws, brought by eight different governmental entities against six steel companies. The City of St. Paul, Minnesota, commencéd its action on February 1, 1968, by filing a complaint in the Third Division of the District of Minnesota. Thereafter, the Housing and Redevelopment
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-12-15 · Published · cited 46× · 90 F.4th 34
21-1365 (en banc) Soule ex rel. Stanescu v. Connecticut Association of Schools, Inc. United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Argued en banc: June 6, 2023 Decided: December 15, 2023 No. 21-1365 SELINA SOULE, A MINOR, BY BIANCA STANESC
District Court, N.D. New York · 2018-11-06 · Published · cited 3× · 350 F. Supp. 3d 94
THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge *104I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff the National Rifle Association of America ("Plaintiff" or "the NRA") commenced this action against defendants New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, both individually and in his official capacity ("Gov. Cuomo"); Superintendent of the New York State Dep
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000-02-17 · Published · cited 0× · 203 F.3d 1028; 2000 WL 190363
BEAM, Circuit J. A certified class of potash consumers appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants (collectively “the producers”) in this action for conspiracy in restraint of trade under section 1 of the Sherman Act. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND This ease involves the production and sale of potash, a mineral essential to pla
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999-05-07 · Published · cited 5× · 176 F.3d 1055; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8764
176 F.3d 1055 1999-1 Trade Cases P 72,515 BLOMKEST FERTILIZER, INC.; Cobden Grain & Feed, on behalfof themselves and all others similarly situated; Plaintiffs,Hahnaman Albrecht, Inc.; John Peterson, doing business asAlmelund Feed & Grain; Laing-Gro Fertilizers,Inc.; Plaintiffs--Appellants,Clearbrook AG Service, Inc., on behalf of itself and allothers similarly situated; Reamford Li
Oregon Supreme Court · 1978-01-31 · Published · cited 66× · 576 P.2d 1204; 281 Or. 137; 1978 Ore. LEXIS 725
576 P.2d 1204 (1978) 281 Or. 137 CITY OF LA GRANDE, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYES RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE STATE OF OREGON, Clay Myers, As Secretary of State of the State of Oregon, La Grande Police Association, and La Grande Firefighters' Union, Local No. 924, International Association of Firefighters, American Federation of Labor, Congress of Industrial Organization, Canadian Labour Congress, Pet
North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977-08-18 · Published · cited 42× · 257 N.W.2d 425; 1977 N.D. LEXIS 164
257 N.W.2d 425 (1977) SOUTHERN VALLEY GRAIN DEALERS ASSN., a North Dakota Unincorporated Association, Petitioner [Appellant below] and Appellant, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF RICHLAND COUNTY, North Dakota, Respondent [Appellee below] and Appellee. Civ. No. 9321. Supreme Court of North Dakota. August 18, 1977. *426
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-08-18 · Published · cited 51× · 9 F.4th 861
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2874 ___________________________ Joyce Vallone, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Erasmus Ikogor, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants,
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007-07-26 · Published · cited 21× · 735 N.W.2d 713; 2007 Minn. LEXIS 440; 2007 WL 2127931
735 N.W.2d 713 (2007) James E. GLUBA, deceased, by Lorraine GLUBA, Relator, v. BITZAN & OHREN MASONRY and Grinnell Mutual Group, Respondents. No. A06-1849. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 26, 2007. *716 DeAnna M. McCashin, Schoep & McCashin, Chtd., Alexandria, MN, for Employee/Relator. Dianne E. Walsh, Heacox, Har
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013-10-22 · Published · cited 0× · 732 F.3d 920; 2013 WL 5716353; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 21366
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-3332 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. John Anthony Markert llllll
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006-04-26 · Published · cited 8× · 432 F. Supp. 2d 822; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25990; 2006 WL 1134640
432 F.Supp.2d 822 (2006) HAWKE YE COMMODITY PROMOTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Thomas J. MILLER, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Iowa, and Kevin W. Techau, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Iowa Department of Public Safety, Defendants. No. C-06-2026-LRR. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern Division. April 26, 2006.
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997-03-12 · Published · cited 16× · 958 F. Supp. 1368; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3013; 1997 WL 115414
958 F.Supp. 1368 (1997) D.W., A.K., S.M., T.M., A.R., and C.H., Plaintiffs, v. RADISSON PLAZA HOTEL ROCHESTER; Chafoulias Companies, Inc.; Chafoulias Management Co.; BDG5 Limited Partnership; Maddux Properties, Inc.; Premier Security, Inc.; G.A.C. Corporation; Gus A. Chafoulias and Andrew C. Chafoulias, Defendants. Civil File No. 3-96-514. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002-04-16 · Published · cited 161× · 286 F.3d 542; 351 U.S. App. D.C. 30; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6992; 2002 WL 553841
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge EDWARDS. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. *544EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: Suspecting that his employer, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) was being defrauded by two companies with whom it had contracted to supply new rail cars with improved toilet sys
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 22-50775 Document: 191-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/31/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit _____________ FILED Decembe
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 64 F. Supp. 3d 906; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165913; 2014 WL 6680570
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. Two same-sex couples brought this lawsuit challenging Mississippi’s laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. One couple wishes to marry in Mississippi; the other was married out-of-state and wants Mississippi to recognize the marriage. A group advocating for gay and lesbian equality has joined their effort to seek relief on behalf of it
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1995-01-18 · Published · cited 5× · 872 F. Supp. 652; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 716; 1995 WL 19676
872 F.Supp. 652 (1995) Steven R. GRUENKE, Richard J. Sytkowski, Kevin A. Welniak, Larry R. Sundem, Gregg A. Pederson, Tracy K. Coates, Cheryl A. Abellas, Cathy L. Alexander, Debra A. Criner, Jill A. Dunham, Gail W. Giles, Sinnie F. Goodman, William J. Hearney, Richard C. Maehr, Jr., Gary T. McCall and Rommel D. Mendoza, Plaintiffs, v. MILES, INC., WELFARE PLAN, Miles Inc., Benefit Plan Administrative Committee, Fred Salek and Hans Thieme, Defenda
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001-03-27 · Published · cited 6× · 137 F. Supp. 2d 821; 2001 WL 293196
137 F.Supp.2d 821 (2001) Barbara GRUTTER, Plaintiff, v. Lee BOLLINGER, Jeffrey Lehman, Dennis Shields, Regents of the University of Michigan, and the University of Michigan Law School, Defendants, and Kimberly James, Farah Mongeau, Jeanette Haslett, Raymond Michael Whitlow, Shabatayah Andrich, Dena Fernandez, Shalamarel Kevin Killough, Diego Bernal, Julie Fry, Jessica Curtin, James Huang, Heather Bergman, Ashwana Carlisle, Ronald Cruz, No
North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983-12-29 · Published · cited 31× · 343 N.W.2d 334; 1983 N.D. LEXIS 434
343 N.W.2d 334 (1983) William LAYMAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee, v. BRAUNSCHWEIGISCHE MASCHINENBAUANSTALT, INC., a Corporation, and BMA Machinery and Equipment Corporation, a Corporation, Defendants, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants. Civ. No. 10449. Supreme Court of North Dakota. December 29, 1983. *335
District Court, District of Columbia · 1989-07-20 · Published · cited 7× · 724 F. Supp. 993; 1989 WL 139165
724 F.Supp. 993 (1989) Domingo P. QUIBAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 86-2155. United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 11, 1989. As Corrected July 20, 1989. *994 Domingo P. Quiban, Quezon City, pro se. Kenneth Steven Kaufman, Beveridge &
Siirila v. Barriospublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 1976-12-21 · Published · cited 63× · 248 N.W.2d 171; 398 Mich. 576; 1976 Mich. LEXIS 203
Williams, J. (to concur). We originally granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether the standard of care for general practitioners should be judged by the practice in the same or similar communities. Counsel for the defense has cogently argued that the issue of the viability of the locality rule as a measure of the standard of care of general practitioners wa