Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mina v. Trump”
Badar Suri v. Donald Trumppublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1560 Doc: 133 Filed: 07/23/2026 Pg: 1 of 86 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1560 BADAR KHAN SURI, Petitioner - Appellee, v. DONALD TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the
66 N.Y.2d 779 (1985) Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Company, Appellant, v. H.R.H. Construction Corporation et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued October 9, 1985. Decided November 12, 1985. Thomas M. Smith for appellant. Jozef K. Goscilo for H.R.H. Construction Corporation, respondent. F. V. Mina for D
*243OPINION OF THE COURT Murphy, P. J. Defendant H.R.H. Construction Corp. (HRH) was the general contractor for the Trump Tower construction project under a contract with the owner, Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Company (Trump-Equitable). Pursuant to contracts with HRH, defendants Dic-Underhill Industries and Alumni Plumbing and Heating Corp. were the
United States v. Cameronpublic domain
756 F.Supp.2d 148 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. James CAMERON. No. 1:09-cr-00024-JAW. United States District Court, D. Maine. November 24, 2010. *149 Michael A. Cunniff, Shaun Garry, McCloskey, Mina, Cunniff, & Dilworth, LLC, Portland, ME, for Defendant. Gail Fisk Malone, James L. McCarthy, Office of the U.S. Atto
Emanuel Mizrahi, DDS, P.C. v Angela Andretta, DMD, P.C. (2019 NY Slip Op 02315) Emanuel Mizrahi, DDS, P.C. v Angela Andretta, DMD, P.C. 2019 NY Slip Op 02315 Decided on March 27, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department
Fenster v. Dechabertpublic domain
DUNSTON, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 8, 2016) Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time will be granted, while their Motion to Dismiss will be granted in part as to Plaintiff’s claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, but denied wi
Trafficschool. Com, Inc. v. Edriver, Inc.public domain
633 F.Supp.2d 1063 (2008) TRAFFICSCHOOL.COM, INC., a California Corporation; Drivers Ed Direct, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. EDRIVER, INC., Online Guru, INC., Find My Specialist, Inc., and Seriousnet, Inc., California corporations, Ravi K. Lahoti, an individual; Raj Lahoti, an individual; Does 1 through 10, Defendants. No. CV 06-7561 PA (CWx). United States District Court
ORDER GRANTING LIEN CLAIMANTS’ MOTION TO ATTACH CUBIC JUDGMENT BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge. This motion concerns an attempt by ten American citizens1 to collect judgments against the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) for personal injuries arising out of the country’s terrorist activities. The Lien Claimants seek to attach the $2.8 million judgment that the Ministry of
Acuña-Atalaya v. Newmont Mining Corp.public domain
Gerald Austin McHugh, United States District Judge This case arises out of a land dispute between indigenous subsistence farmers in Peru and the Peruvian subsidiary of a multi-national gold mining company headquartered in the United States. At the forefront is a rancorous struggle over the right to occupy the land in question, amid years-long litigation in Peruvian courts. Plaintiffs Máxima Acuña-Atalaya de Chaupe and her family com
United States Steel Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
362 F.Supp.2d 1336 (2005) UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and Ispat Inland Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Usinas SiderUrgicas de Minas Gerais S/A, Companhia Siderurgica Paulista and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, Defendant-Intervenors. Slip.Op. 05-4, Court No. 99-08-00525. United States Court of International Trade. January 21, 2005.
Williams v. Empire Funding Corp.public domain
109 F.Supp.2d 352 (2000) Kim WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. EMPIRE FUNDING CORP., et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 97-4518. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 7, 2000. *353 *354 Henry J. Sommer, Miller, Frank and Miller, Philadelphia, PA, David A. Searles, Donovan, Miller, LLC, Ph
Trunk v. City of San Diegopublic domain
629 F.3d 1099 (2011) Steve TRUNK, Plaintiff, and Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America, Inc.; Richard A. Smith; Mina Sagheb; Judith M. Copeland, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; United States of America; Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Defendants-Appellees. *1100 Steve Trunk, Philip K. Paulson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Richard A. Smith; Mina Sagheb; Judith M. Cop
Federal Trade Commission v. CCC Holdings Inc.public domain
605 F.Supp.2d 26 (2009) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CCC HOLDINGS INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-2043 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 18, 2009. *29 Eric D. Edmondson, J. Robert Robertson, Kenneth H. Abbe, Kyle D. Andeer, Sean D. Hughto, Victoria Lynn Lippincott, Abigail S
Johnson v. Districtpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHARNENE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-3167 (JEB) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION While escorting a domestic-violence victim back to her apartment several years ago, Metropolitan Police Department officers engaged in a
PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureaupublic domain
KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Effective 1789, we Americans “set up government by consent of the governed.” W. Va. State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 641, 63 S.Ct. 1178, 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943). Under the United States Constitution, all of the federal government’s power derives from the people. U.S. Const. pmbl.; see McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S.
201 F.Supp.2d 1304 (2002) USINAS SIDERÚRGICAS DE MINAS GERAIS S/A, Companhia Siderúrgica Paulista and Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation, U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of USX Corporation, Ispat Inland Inc., LTV Steel Company, Inc. and National Steel Corporation, Defendant-Intervenors, and Gallatin Steel Company, IPSCO Steel Inc., Steel Dynamics, Inc. and Weirton Steel Corpor
United States Steel Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 05-4 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE _______________________________________________ : UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and ISPAT INLAND INC., : Plaintiffs, : v. : UNITED STATES,
KIDD, Justice. Appellee September Toungate, on behalf of her minor son Zachariah, sought declaratory and injunctive relief in district court against appellant Board of Trustees for the Bastrop Independent School District (“the Board”) after the Board suspended Zachariah for the length of his hair. Toungate argued that the Board discriminated against Zachariah on the basis of his gender because the Board’s grooming policy permi
Jewish War Veterans of the Uni v. City of San Diegopublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVE TRUNK, Plaintiff, and JEWISH WAR VETERANS OF THE No. 08-56415 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.; RICHARD A. SMITH; MINA SAGHEB; D.C. Nos. JUDITH M. COPELAND, 3:06-cv-01597- LAB-WMC Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Amadeo Ocasio Y otros v. Pierluisi Urrutia Y Otrospublic domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Lourdes Amadeo Ocasio; Miguel Marrero, ambos por sí y en representación de sus hijos A.M.A, M.M.A. y otros Recurridos Certiorari v. 2023 TSPR 17 Pedro Pierluisi Urrutia en su capacidad como Gobernador del 211 DPR ___ Gobierno de Puerto Rico; Departamento de Salud, por conducto de su Secretario, Dr.